What have we learned from intensive atmospheric sampling field programmes of CO2?

被引:23
|
作者
Lin, J. C.
Gerbig, C.
Wofsy, S. C.
Daube, B. C.
Matross, D. M.
Chow, V. Y.
Gottlieb, E.
Andrews, A. E.
Pathmathevan, M.
Munger, J. W.
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, D-07745 Jena, Germany
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Div Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] NOAA, Climate Monitoring & Diagnost Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
来源
TELLUS SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY | 2006年 / 58卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00202.x
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The spatial and temporal gradients in atmospheric CO2 contain signatures of carbon fluxes, and as part of inverse studies, these signatures have been combined with atmospheric models to infer carbon sources and sinks. However, such studies have yet to yield finer-scale, regional fluxes over the continent that can be linked to ecosystem processes and ground-based observations. The reasons for this gap are twofold: lack of atmospheric observations over the continent and model deficiencies in interpreting such observations. This paper describes a series of intensive atmospheric sampling field programmes designed as pilot experiments to bridge the observational gap over the continent and to help test and develop models to interpret these observations. We summarize recent results emerging from this work, outlining the role of the intensive atmospheric programmes in collecting CO2 data in both the vertical and horizontal dimensions. These data: (1) quantitatively establish the spatial variability of CO2 and the associated errors from neglecting this variability in models; (2) directly measure regional carbon fluxes from airmass-following experiments and (3) challenge models to reduce and account for uncertainties in atmospheric transport. We conclude with a look towards the future, outlining ways in which intensive atmospheric sampling can contribute towards advancing carbon science.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 343
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What have we learned from ESPRIT? What will we learn from TARGET?
    Ferguson, JJ
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 12 (06): : 317 - 319
  • [32] What have we really learned from SARS?
    Chin, M
    Yang, H
    Po, J
    Wynands, E
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2006, 53 (02): : 113 - 116
  • [33] Hemicentins: What have we learned from worms?
    Vogel, Bruce E.
    Muriel, Joaquin M.
    Dong, Chun
    Xu, Xuehong
    CELL RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (11) : 872 - 878
  • [34] What have we learned from market design?
    Roth, Alvin E.
    ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2008, 118 (527): : 285 - 310
  • [35] What have we learned from observational cosmology?
    Hamilton, J. -Ch.
    STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2014, 46 : 70 - 85
  • [36] What have we learned from the Smart Machine?
    Burton-Jones, Andrew
    INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATION, 2014, 24 (02) : 71 - 105
  • [37] Myc - What We have Learned from Flies
    Siddall, N. A.
    Lin, J. I.
    Hime, G. R.
    Quinn, L. M.
    CURRENT DRUG TARGETS, 2009, 10 (07) : 590 - 601
  • [38] What Have We Learned From the Osaka Study?
    Uchino, Miki
    Uchino, Yuichi
    Kawashima, Motoko
    Yokoi, Norihiko
    Tsubota, Kazuo
    CORNEA, 2018, 37 : S62 - S66
  • [39] What Have We Learned From the ABSORB Trials?
    Kimura, Takeshi
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (03) : 273 - 274
  • [40] What Have We Learned from IS08?
    Kitterman, Dick
    Insight, 2008, 11 (04)