What have we learned from intensive atmospheric sampling field programmes of CO2?

被引:23
|
作者
Lin, J. C.
Gerbig, C.
Wofsy, S. C.
Daube, B. C.
Matross, D. M.
Chow, V. Y.
Gottlieb, E.
Andrews, A. E.
Pathmathevan, M.
Munger, J. W.
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, D-07745 Jena, Germany
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Div Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] NOAA, Climate Monitoring & Diagnost Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00202.x
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The spatial and temporal gradients in atmospheric CO2 contain signatures of carbon fluxes, and as part of inverse studies, these signatures have been combined with atmospheric models to infer carbon sources and sinks. However, such studies have yet to yield finer-scale, regional fluxes over the continent that can be linked to ecosystem processes and ground-based observations. The reasons for this gap are twofold: lack of atmospheric observations over the continent and model deficiencies in interpreting such observations. This paper describes a series of intensive atmospheric sampling field programmes designed as pilot experiments to bridge the observational gap over the continent and to help test and develop models to interpret these observations. We summarize recent results emerging from this work, outlining the role of the intensive atmospheric programmes in collecting CO2 data in both the vertical and horizontal dimensions. These data: (1) quantitatively establish the spatial variability of CO2 and the associated errors from neglecting this variability in models; (2) directly measure regional carbon fluxes from airmass-following experiments and (3) challenge models to reduce and account for uncertainties in atmospheric transport. We conclude with a look towards the future, outlining ways in which intensive atmospheric sampling can contribute towards advancing carbon science.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 343
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What have we learned about CO2 leakage from field injection tests?
    Roberts, Jennifer J.
    Stalker, Linda
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 5711 - 5731
  • [2] What have we learnt about CO2 leakage from CO2 release field experiments, and what are the gaps for the future?
    Roberts, Jennifer J.
    Stalker, Linda
    EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2020, 209
  • [3] Community programmes in palliative care: What have we learned
    Kumar, S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2005, 11 (01) : 55 - 57
  • [4] MIDGESTATION CORD SAMPLING - WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED
    MARCONI, AM
    CETIN, I
    BUSCAGLIA, M
    PARDI, G
    PLACENTA, 1992, 13 (02) : 115 - 122
  • [5] Atmospheric sulphur and climate - What have we learned?
    Cox, RA
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1997, 352 (1350) : 251 - 254
  • [6] What have we learned from β?
    Bersohn, Richard
    ACS Symposium Series, 2001, 770 : 19 - 33
  • [7] What Have We Learned from Helioseismology, What Have We Really Learned, and What Do We Aspire to Learn?
    Gough, Douglas
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2013, 287 (1-2) : 9 - 41
  • [8] What Have We Learned from Helioseismology, What Have We Really Learned, and What Do We Aspire to Learn?
    Douglas Gough
    Solar Physics, 2013, 287 : 9 - 41
  • [9] Catalysis for CO2 Hydrogenation-What We Have Learned/Should Learn from the Hydrogenation of Syngas to Methanol
    Yang, Zixu
    Guo, Derun
    Dong, Shengbin
    Wu, Jiayi
    Zhu, Minghui
    Han, Yi-Fan
    Liu, Zhong-Wen
    CATALYSTS, 2023, 13 (11)
  • [10] What Have We Learned From Antibiotics?
    Smith, James Leif
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 12 (08) : 1183 - 1183