Development of a Patient-Based Model for Estimating Operative Times for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:6
|
作者
Huben, Neil B. [1 ,2 ]
Hussein, Ahmed A. [1 ,3 ]
May, Paul R. [1 ]
Whittum, Michelle [1 ]
Krasowski, Collin [1 ]
Ahmed, Youssef E. [1 ]
Jing, Zhe [1 ]
Khan, Hijab [1 ]
Kim, Hyung L. [4 ]
Schwaab, Thomas [1 ]
Underwood, Willie [1 ]
Kauffman, Eric C. [1 ]
Mohler, James L. [1 ]
Guru, Khurshid A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[2] Alabama Coll Osteopath Med, Dothan, AL USA
[3] Cairo Univ, Dept Urol, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Cedar Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
robot-assisted; prostatectomy; operative time; cost; quality control; scheduling; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; CANCER; SURGERY; COST; PREDICTORS; CYSTECTOMY; OUTCOMES; MINUTE; IMPACT; MEN;
D O I
10.1089/end.2018.0249
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To develop a methodology for predicting operative times for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using preoperative patient, disease, procedural, and surgeon variables to facilitate operating room (OR) scheduling. Methods: The model included preoperative metrics: body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, clinical stage, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk, prostate weight, nerve-sparing status, extent and laterality of lymph node dissection, and operating surgeon (six surgeons were included in the study). A binary decision tree was fit using a conditional inference tree method to predict operative times. The variables most associated with operative time were determined using permutation tests. Data were split at the value of the variable that results in the largest difference in mean for surgical time across the split. This process was repeated recursively on the resultant data. Results: A total of 1709 RARPs were included. The variable most strongly associated with operative time was the surgeon (surgeons 2 and 4102 minutes shorter than surgeons 1, 3, 5, and 6, p<0.001). Among surgeons 2 and 4, BMI had the strongest association with surgical time (p<0.001). Among patients operated by surgeons 1, 3, 5, and 6, RARP time was again most strongly associated with the surgeon performing RARP. Surgeons 1, 3, and 6 were on average 76 minutes faster than surgeon 5 (p<0.001). The regression tree output in the form of box plots showed operative time median and ranges according to patient, disease, procedural, and surgeon metrics. Conclusion: We developed a methodology that can predict operative times for RARP based on patient, disease and surgeon variables. This methodology can be utilized for quality control, facilitate OR scheduling, and maximize OR efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 736
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Editorial Comment to Predictors of operative time during radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Shimbo, Masaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (08) : 624 - 624
  • [42] DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDATION OF A SAFETY CHECKLIST FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Lovegrove, Catherine
    Novara, Giacomo
    Guru, Khurshid
    Mottrie, Alex
    Challacombe, Ben
    Raza, Johar
    Van der Poel, Henk
    Peabody, James
    Popert, Rick
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Ahmed, Kamran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E267 - E267
  • [43] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF PROSTATECTOMY ASSESSMENT AND COMPETENCY EVALUATION SCORING FOR ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Hussein, Ahmed
    Ghani, Khurshid
    Peabody, James
    Lane, Brian
    Sarle, Richard
    Abaza, Ronney
    Hu, Jim
    Fumo, Michael
    Montgomery, Jeffrey
    Eun, Daniel
    Rooney, Deborah
    Comstock, Bryan
    Linsell, Susan
    Miller, David
    Guru, Khurshid
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E712 - E712
  • [44] Karolinska prostatectomy: A robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique
    Nilsson, Andreas E.
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Laven, Brett A.
    Wiklund, N. Peter
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 40 (06): : 453 - 458
  • [45] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy feasibility and setting with the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system
    Sarchi, Luca
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Paciotti, Marco
    Farinha, Rui
    Piazza, Pietro
    Puliatti, Stefano
    De Groote, Ruben
    De Naeyer, Geert
    Gallagher, Anthony
    Breda, Alberto
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 130 (05) : 671 - 675
  • [46] IMPACT OF INCREASED USE OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON OPEN AND ROBOT-ASSISTED PROSTATECTOMIES
    Hofer, Matthias
    Meeks, Joshua
    Cashy, John
    Zhao, Lee
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E32 - E33
  • [47] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy training: Description of a canine cadaveric model
    Jamet, Antoine
    Hubert, Nicolas
    Maire, Jerome
    Tran, Nguyen
    Hubert, Jacques
    Mazeaud, Charles
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2022, 18 (03):
  • [48] Is Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Safer Than Other Radical Prostatectomy Techniques?
    Marberger, Michael
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (05) : 699 - 700
  • [49] Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system: feasibility, operative setup and surgical outcomes
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Chierigo, Francesco
    Cellini, Valerio
    Tappero, Stefano
    Olivero, Alberto
    Maltzman, Ofir
    Caviglia, Alberto
    Piccione, Antonio
    Buratto, Carlo
    Barbieri, Michele
    Napoli, Giancarlo
    Strada, Elena
    Palagonia, Erika
    Petralia, Giovanni
    Secco, Silvia
    Di Trapani, Dario
    Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo
    Galfano, Antonio
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 135 (01) : 166 - 170
  • [50] Is the elderly patient at increased risk when undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Capello, Seth A.
    Boczko, Judd
    Patel, Hitendra R. H.
    Joseph, Jean V.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 531 - 531