Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Jr Braided Stent Versus Atlas Self-Expandable Stent for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience

被引:10
|
作者
Monteiro, Andre [1 ]
Cortez, Gustavo M. [1 ]
Aghaebrahim, Amin [1 ]
Sauvageau, Eric [1 ]
Hanel, Ricardo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baptist Neurol Inst, Lyerly Neurosurg, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词
Aneurysm; Ruptured; Angioplasty; Intracranial aneurysm; Stents; ASSISTED COILING; LVIS JR; EMBOLIZATION; DEVICE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1093/neuros/nyaa458
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The Neuroform Atlas Stent and Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) and LVIS Jr stents are used to treat intracranial aneurysms (IAs), but their safety, performance, and outcomes have not been directly compared. OBJECTIVE: To compare the technical performance and outcomes of Atlas and LVIS Jr stents for treatment of IAs. METHODS: IAs treated by stent-assisted coiling using an Atlas (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan) or LVIS Jr (MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, California) device between January 2014 to November 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient demographics, aneurysm size and location, technical difficulties, and clinical and angiographic follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients, (mean age 64.2 11.8 yr, 72.7% female) with 121 aneurysms underwent stent-assisted coiling with deployment of Atlas (n = 64) or LVIS Jr (n = 57) stents. Mean aneurysm size was 6.2 +/- 2.7 mm. Immediate rates of Raymond-Roy (RR) 1/2 were 89.0% (57/64) and 80.7% (46/57) for the Atlas and LVIS Jr groups, respectively. Neither group had major postoperative thromboembolic complications; however, 15.8% (9/57) of the LVIS Jr procedures had technical issues. Additionally, 88.5% (46/52) and 91.2% (33/36) of patients in the Atlas and LVIS Jr groups had RR 1/2 at a mean follow-up of 13.6 and 18.7 mo, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of IAs with Atlas and LVIS Jr stents results in favorable clinical outcomes and angiographic results at follow-up, with low rates of recurrence and retreatment, suggesting both devices are safe and effective. Notably, LVIS Jr had more technical problems than Atlas.
引用
收藏
页码:E170 / E178
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support device (LVIS Jr) as a novel tool in the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: initial experience in 32 cases
    Behme, Daniel
    Weber, Anushe
    Kowoll, Annika
    Berlis, Ansgar
    Burke, Thomas H.
    Weber, Werner
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2015, 7 (04) : 281 - 285
  • [32] Treatment of basilar artery aneurysms with two braided stents: Two centers experience of low-profile visualized intraluminal support stents versus Pipeline flow diverters
    Luo, Bin
    Wang, Chao
    Liu, Jian
    Zhang, Yisen
    Wang, Kun
    Li, Wenqiang
    Zhang, Ying
    NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 37 (04): : 500 - 509
  • [33] Endovascular Intervention with a Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Stent Versus Surgical Clipping for Blood Blister-like Aneurysms A Retrospective Study
    Wu, Ya-Qiu
    Li, Li-Zhi
    Wang, Zhen-Yu
    Zhang, Tian
    Xu, Min
    Cheng, Mei-Xiong
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 417 - 424
  • [34] Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for tiny ruptured intracranial aneurysms with low-profile visualized intraluminal support stents
    Jin, Yazhou
    Guo, Xinbin
    Quan, Tao
    Chen, Zhen
    Liu, Chao
    Guan, Sheng
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023, 29 (02) : 141 - 147
  • [35] Comparative Analysis of the Low-Profile Acclino Stent and the Enterprise Stent for the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Goertz, Lukas
    Zopfs, David
    Pennig, Lenhard
    Zaeske, Charlotte
    Timmer, Marco
    Turowski, Bernd
    Kaschner, Marius
    Borggrefe, Jan
    Schoenfeld, Michael
    Schlamann, Marc
    Kabbasch, Christoph
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 182 : E517 - E524
  • [36] Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Stent-Only Technique for Intracranial Aneurysms-A Report of 12 Cases with Midterm Follow-Up
    Liu, Qinglin
    Qi, Changjing
    Zhang, Yupeng
    Deng, Lin
    Li, Gang
    Su, Wandong
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 129 : E40 - E47
  • [37] Retractable self-expandable stent for endovasculartreatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms:: Preliminary experience
    Lubicz, B
    Leclerc, X
    Levivier, M
    Brotchi, J
    Pruvo, JP
    Lejeune, JP
    Balériaux, D
    NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 58 (03) : 451 - 456
  • [38] Treatment options for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using a self-expandable hydrophilic coil and a self-expandable stent combination
    Brisman, JL
    Song, JK
    Niimi, Y
    Berenstein, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (05) : 1237 - 1240
  • [39] Three-dimensional fusion imaging to assess apposition of low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent for intracranial aneurysm coiling
    Kato, Naoki
    Ishibashi, Toshihiro
    Otani, Katharina
    Abe, Yukiko
    Sano, Tohru
    Nagayama, Gota
    Fuga, Michiyasu
    Hataoka, Shunsuke
    Kan, Issei
    Murayama, Yuichi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY-X, 2024, 23
  • [40] Coil embolization of intracranial saccular aneurysms using the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS™) device
    Cho, Young Dae
    Sohn, Chul-Ho
    Kang, Hyun-Seung
    Kim, Jeong Eun
    Cho, Won-Sang
    Hwang, Gyojun
    Kwon, O-Ki
    Ko, Mi-Sun
    Park, Nam-Mi
    Han, Moon Hee
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2014, 56 (07) : 543 - 551