Adjacent Segment Degeneration Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

被引:16
|
作者
Yan, Suo-Zhou [1 ]
Di, Jun [1 ]
Shen, Yong [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Spinal Surg, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Hebei Prov Key Lab Orthoped Biomech, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2017年 / 23卷
关键词
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration; Spine; Spondylosis; Total Disc Replacement; ARTIFICIAL DISC; ONE-LEVEL; REPLACEMENT; DECOMPRESSION; METAANALYSIS; MYELOPATHY; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; SPINE;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.905178
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established treatment for degenerative disease of the cervical disc, but adjacent segment degeneration or instability may develop long term. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration following ACDF compared with the use of the Bryan artificial disc for cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). Material/Methods: A prospective comparative study included 93 patients who underwent ACDF or CDA with the Bryan artificial cervical disc between 2002 and 2004, and who had more than eight years of follow-up. There were 29 cases in the CDA group and 39 cases in ACDF group, with a follow-up rate of 73.12%. Clinical results and imaging data were assessed before and after surgery. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in radiographic parameters at each follow-up time point. There were 19 cases of adjacent segment degeneration (48.72%) in the ACDF group, and 13 cases of adjacent segment degeneration (44.83%) in the CDA group, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Univariate analysis showed that advanced age (OR 1.271, 95% CI 1.005-1.607), low preoperative overall lordosis (OR 0.858, 95% CI 0.786-0.936) and low preoperative segmental lordosis (OR 1.185, 95% CI 1.086-1.193) were significantly correlated with adjacent segment degeneration. Conclusions: Equally good clinical outcomes were achieved with both the ACDF and the Bryan CDA. Increasing patient age was associated with adjacent segment degeneration in both patient groups.
引用
收藏
页码:2692 / 2700
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What is a better value for your time? Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty
    Katz, Austen David
    Song, Junho
    Bowles, Daniel
    Ng, Terence
    Neufeld, Eric
    Hasan, Sayyida
    Perfetti, Dean
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Essig, David
    Silber, Jeff
    Virk, Sohrab
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2022, 13 (03): : 331 - 338
  • [32] Cervical Disc Arthroplasty is an Acceptable Treatment Option for Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Fusion
    Clark, DesRaj M.
    Yow, Bobby G.
    Piscoya, Andres S.
    Roach, William B.
    Wagner, Scott C.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (04): : 119 - 120
  • [33] Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Prestige LP Disc Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Seven-Year Outcomes
    Gornet, Matthew F.
    Burkus, J. Kenneth
    Shaffrey, Mark E.
    Nian, Hui
    Harrell, Frank E., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 10
  • [34] Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Ding, Chen
    Hong, Ying
    Liu, Hao
    Shi, Rui
    Song, Yueming
    Li, Tao
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2013, 79 (03): : 338 - 346
  • [35] Cervical Spine Endplate Abnormalities and Association With Pain, Disability, and Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Harada, Garrett K.
    Alter, Kevin
    Nguyen, Austin Q.
    Tao, Youping
    Louie, Philip K.
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Galbusera, Fabio
    Niemeyer, Frank
    Wilke, Hans-Joachim
    An, Howard S.
    Samartzis, Dino
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (15) : E917 - E926
  • [36] The Statistical Fragility of Trials Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Ortiz-Babilonia, Carlos D.
    Gupta, Arjun
    Cartagena-Reyes, Miguel A.
    Xu, Amy L.
    Raad, Micheal
    Durand, Wesley M.
    Skolasky, Richard L.
    Jain, Amit
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (10) : 708 - 714
  • [37] Impact of T1 slope on surgical and adjacent segment degeneration after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty
    Yang, Peng
    Li, Yongqian
    Li, Jia
    Shen, Yong
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 : 1119 - 1125
  • [38] A matched cohort comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Evaluating perioperative outcomes
    Upadhyayula, Pavan S.
    Yue, John K.
    Curtis, Erik I.
    Hoshide, Reid
    Ciacci, Joseph D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 43 : 235 - 239
  • [39] Evaluation of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Spine Surgery: Arthroplasty Versus Fusion
    Hamidi, Saeed
    Fahimi, Neda
    Jangholi, Ehsan
    Fahimi, Mohammad Ali
    Farshad, Ali
    Foroushani, Farshid Nazari
    Najibpour, Reza
    Yavari, Hassan
    GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 2 (01): : 12 - 17
  • [40] Motion analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: Results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial
    Sasso, Rick C.
    Best, Natalie M.
    Metcalf, Newton H.
    Anderson, Paul A.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (06): : 393 - 399