Evaluation of preferences in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and dysphagia concerning treatment with lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets

被引:3
|
作者
Angeles Blanco, Maria [2 ]
Prieto, Miguel [3 ]
Mearin, Fermin [4 ]
Jose Plazas, Maria [5 ]
Armengol, Silvia [5 ]
Heras, Joan [5 ]
Mas, Marta [6 ]
Pique, Josep M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Serv Gastroenterol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp Virgen Torre, Serv Gastroenterol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp La Paz, Serv Gastroenterol, Madrid, Spain
[4] Clin Teknon, Serv Gastroenterol, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Labs Almirall SA, Dept Med, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Trial Form Support, Dept Med, Barcelona, Spain
来源
GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA | 2009年 / 32卷 / 08期
关键词
Lansoprazole; Gastroesophageal reflux; Dysphagia; Preference; PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR; ACCEPTABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.05.004
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction and objective: Recently, a new lansoprazole formulation consisting of orally disintegrating tablets has become available, which could improve acceptability and compliance with this type of medication. The aim of the present study was to evaluate preferences in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease concerning lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets compared with lansoprazole capsules. Material and methods: A phase IV, multicenter, crossed, open and randomized clinical trial was performed in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated dysphagia. The patients were treated with 30 mg lansoprazole capsules for 3 days and with 30 mg lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets for another 3 days. The order of treatment (first capsules followed by orally disintegrating tablets or vice versa) was determined by centralized block randomization. The main measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) score in which patients was asked to rate their degree of preference for the orally disintegrating tablets or the capsules. Results: Of the 145 patients included, 126 could be evaluated by the protocol. A total of 47% (59/126) of the patients preferred the orally disintegrating tablets, 33% (42/126) preferred the capsules and the remainder (25/126) had no preference. The mean preference value in the VAS was 5.31 (4.72 +/- 5.90) in favor of the orally disintegrating tablets, although this difference was not statistically significant. In general, differences in favor of the orally disintegrating tables were more marked in older patients. The percentage of patients free of pyrosis at the end of both treatment sequences was approximately 75% with no differences according to which treatment was administered first. Finally, preference evaluation through willingness to pay techniques showed similar results, again in favor of the orally disintegrating tablets (4.18 (sic) +/- 6.86 (sic) vs 3.47 (sic) +/- 5.78 (sic)). Conclusion: The acceptability of pharmaceutical formulations of Lansoprazole in capsules and orally disintegrating tables is similar among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated dysphagia. However, a clear, but nonsignificant, trend was observed in favor of orally disintegrating tablets among older patients. (C) 2009 Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 548
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dysphagia following fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Treatment with fluoroscopically guided balloon dilation
    Hiatt, MD
    De Lange, EE
    Shaffer, HA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 446 - 446
  • [42] A proton pump inhibitor, lansoprazole, ameliorates asthma symptoms in asthmatic patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Shimizu, Yasuo
    Dobashi, Kunio
    Kobayashi, Setsuo
    Ohki, Ichiro
    Tokushima, Masahiko
    Kusano, Motoyasu
    Kawamura, Osamu
    Shimoyama, Yasuyuki
    Utsugi, Mitsuyoshi
    Sunaga, Noriaki
    Ishizuka, Tamotsu
    Mori, Masatomo
    [J]. TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2006, 209 (03): : 181 - 189
  • [43] Indication for surgical treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Fuchs, KH
    Freys, SM
    Heimbucher, J
    Thiede, A
    [J]. CHIRURGISCHE GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 1997, 13 (02): : 106 - 109
  • [44] Evaluation of the effect of orally disintegrating olanzapine tablets on cooperation in non-compliant patients in clinical practice
    Vandendriessche, F
    van Heeringen, C
    Gillain, B
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2004, 67 (01) : 166 - 166
  • [45] Respiratory symptoms and dysphagia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparison of medical and surgical therapy
    M. Gadenstätter
    H. Wykypiel
    G. P. Schwab
    C. Profanter
    G. J. Wetscher
    [J]. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 1999, 384 : 563 - 567
  • [46] Respiratory symptoms and dysphagia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease:: a comparison of medical and surgical therapy
    Gadenstätter, M
    Wykypiel, H
    Schwab, GP
    Profanter, C
    Wetscher, GJ
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 384 (06) : 563 - 567
  • [47] The many manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Presentation, evaluation, and treatment
    Richter, Joel E.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 36 (03) : 577 - +
  • [48] Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
    Naimark, D
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (04) : A31 - A31
  • [49] Evaluation of Esophageal Mucosal Integrity in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Matsumura, Tomoaki
    Arai, Makoto
    Ishigami, Hideaki
    Fujie, Mai
    Ishikawa, Kentaro
    Akizue, Naoki
    Taida, Takashi
    Ohta, Yuki
    Hamanaka, Shinsaku
    Okimoto, Kenichiro
    Saito, Keiko
    Maruoka, Daisuke
    Nakagawa, Tomoo
    Kato, Naoya
    [J]. DIGESTION, 2018, 97 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [50] A multicenter, open-label, sequential study comparing preferences for Carbidopa-Levodopa orally disintegrating tablets and conventional tablets in subjects with Parkinson's disease
    Nausieda, PA
    Pfeiffer, RF
    Tagliati, M
    Kastenholz, KV
    DeRoche, C
    Slevin, JT
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 27 (01) : 58 - 63