Evaluation of preferences in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and dysphagia concerning treatment with lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets

被引:3
|
作者
Angeles Blanco, Maria [2 ]
Prieto, Miguel [3 ]
Mearin, Fermin [4 ]
Jose Plazas, Maria [5 ]
Armengol, Silvia [5 ]
Heras, Joan [5 ]
Mas, Marta [6 ]
Pique, Josep M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Serv Gastroenterol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp Virgen Torre, Serv Gastroenterol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp La Paz, Serv Gastroenterol, Madrid, Spain
[4] Clin Teknon, Serv Gastroenterol, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Labs Almirall SA, Dept Med, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Trial Form Support, Dept Med, Barcelona, Spain
来源
GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA | 2009年 / 32卷 / 08期
关键词
Lansoprazole; Gastroesophageal reflux; Dysphagia; Preference; PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR; ACCEPTABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.05.004
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction and objective: Recently, a new lansoprazole formulation consisting of orally disintegrating tablets has become available, which could improve acceptability and compliance with this type of medication. The aim of the present study was to evaluate preferences in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease concerning lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets compared with lansoprazole capsules. Material and methods: A phase IV, multicenter, crossed, open and randomized clinical trial was performed in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated dysphagia. The patients were treated with 30 mg lansoprazole capsules for 3 days and with 30 mg lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets for another 3 days. The order of treatment (first capsules followed by orally disintegrating tablets or vice versa) was determined by centralized block randomization. The main measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) score in which patients was asked to rate their degree of preference for the orally disintegrating tablets or the capsules. Results: Of the 145 patients included, 126 could be evaluated by the protocol. A total of 47% (59/126) of the patients preferred the orally disintegrating tablets, 33% (42/126) preferred the capsules and the remainder (25/126) had no preference. The mean preference value in the VAS was 5.31 (4.72 +/- 5.90) in favor of the orally disintegrating tablets, although this difference was not statistically significant. In general, differences in favor of the orally disintegrating tables were more marked in older patients. The percentage of patients free of pyrosis at the end of both treatment sequences was approximately 75% with no differences according to which treatment was administered first. Finally, preference evaluation through willingness to pay techniques showed similar results, again in favor of the orally disintegrating tablets (4.18 (sic) +/- 6.86 (sic) vs 3.47 (sic) +/- 5.78 (sic)). Conclusion: The acceptability of pharmaceutical formulations of Lansoprazole in capsules and orally disintegrating tables is similar among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated dysphagia. However, a clear, but nonsignificant, trend was observed in favor of orally disintegrating tablets among older patients. (C) 2009 Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 548
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acceptability of lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease -: ACEPTO study
    de Argila, Carlos Martin
    Ponce, Julio
    Marquez, Emilio
    Plazas, M. Jose
    Galvan, Jordi
    Heras, Joan
    Porcel, Joana
    [J]. CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2007, 27 (11) : 765 - 770
  • [2] A comparison of the new Lansoprazole orally disintegrating (LODT) tablets with esomeprazole in patients with non erosive reflux disease
    Baldi, F
    Ghersi, S
    Cavoli, C
    Torresan, F
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 128 (04) : A523 - A524
  • [3] Acceptability of Lansoprazole Orally Disintegrating Tablets in Patients with Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux DiseaseACEPTO Study
    Carlos Martin de Argila
    Julio Ponce
    Emilio Márquez
    M José Plazas
    Jordi Galván
    Joan Heras
    Joana Porcel
    [J]. Clinical Drug Investigation, 2007, 27 : 765 - 770
  • [4] In vitro evaluation of enteral tube administration of lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablets
    Hoover, Alicia
    Chitranshi, Priyanka
    Momot, Magdalene
    Tyner, Katherine
    Wokovich, Anna
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 26 (08) : 846 - 851
  • [5] Orally disintegrating olanzapine tablets in the treatment of a neuropsychiatric patient with dysphagia
    Wang, Hui-Yi
    Tzeng, Nian-Sheng
    [J]. ACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA, 2011, 23 (01): : 54 - 54
  • [6] Safety of lansoprazole in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children
    Tolia, V
    Fitzgerald, J
    Hassall, E
    Huang, BD
    Pilmer, B
    Kane, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2002, 35 : S300 - S307
  • [7] Efficacy of lansoprazole in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children
    Tolia, V
    Ferry, G
    Gunasekaran, T
    Huang, BD
    Keith, R
    Book, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2002, 35 : S308 - S318
  • [8] Dexlansoprazole: delayed-release orally disintegrating tablets for the treatment of heartburn associated with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and the maintenance of erosive esophagitis
    Oldfield, Edward C.
    Parekh, Parth J.
    Johnson, David A.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 10 (10) : 1083 - 1089
  • [9] Comparison of the effect of lansoprazole and omeprazole on intragastric acidity and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Janczewska, I
    Sagar, M
    Sjöstedt, S
    Hammarlund, B
    Iwarzon, M
    Seensalu, R
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 33 (12) : 1239 - 1243
  • [10] Lansoprazole compared with ranitidine for the treatment of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Richter, JE
    Campbell, DR
    Kahrilas, PJ
    Huang, BD
    Fludas, C
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (12) : 1803 - 1809