Partnerships in obesity prevention: maximising co-benefits

被引:8
|
作者
Jones, Michelle [1 ,2 ]
Verity, Fiona [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dept Hlth & Ageing, POB 287,Rundle Mall, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ South Australia, Sch Hlth Sci, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] Swansea Univ, Coll Human & Hlth Sci, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Social & Policy Studies, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
childhood obesity prevention; community development; qualitative; evaluation; PUBLIC-HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1071/HE16047
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Issue addressed: Partnerships were used to increase healthy eating and active living in children for the Obesity Prevention and Lifestyle (OPAL) program, a systems-wide, community-based childhood obesity prevention program in South Australia. This part of the multi-component evaluation examines stakeholders' perceptions of how OPAL staff worked in partnership and factors contributing to strong partnerships. Methods: Pre- and post-interviews and focus groups with multi-sector stakeholders (n = 131) across six OPAL communities were analysed using NVivo8 qualitative data analysis software. Results: Stakeholders reflected positively on projects developed in partnership with OPAL, reporting that staff worked to establish co-benefits. They identified several factors that contributed to the strengthening of partnerships: staff skills, visibility, resources and sustainability. Conclusions: Rather than implementing projects with stakeholders with shared organisational goals, local shared projects were implemented that included a breadth of co-benefits, allowing multi-sector stakeholders to meet their own organisational goals. Practitioners who have the capacity to be flexible, persistent, knowledgeable and skilled communicators are required to negotiate projects, achieving benefit for both health and stakeholders' organisational goals. So what? Engaging in partnership practice to broker co-benefits at the micro or program level has been an effective model for community engagement and change in OPAL. It foregrounds the need for the inclusion of value to partners, which differs from situations in which organisations come together around common goals.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 51
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Co-benefits of energy efficiency in residential buildings
    Baniassadi, Amir
    Heusinger, Jannik
    Gonzalez, Pablo Izaga
    Weber, Stephan
    Samuelson, Holly W.
    ENERGY, 2022, 238 (238)
  • [32] The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy
    Mayrhofer, Jan P.
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 57 : 22 - 30
  • [33] The co-benefits of California offshore wind electricity
    Rose, Adam
    Wei, Dan
    Einbinder, Adam
    ELECTRICITY JOURNAL, 2022, 35 (07):
  • [34] Co-benefits from energy policies in China
    He, K.
    Lei, Y.
    Pan, X.
    Zhang, Y.
    Zhang, Q.
    Chen, D.
    ENERGY, 2010, 35 (11) : 4265 - 4272
  • [35] Climate policy and the concept of co-benefits in India
    Theresa Stahlke
    Journal of Social and Economic Development, 2023, 25 : 86 - 102
  • [36] Predictable SCR Co-Benefits for Mercury Control
    Pritchard, Scot
    POWER ENGINEERING, 2009, 113 (01) : 42 - +
  • [37] Determining AQCS Mercury Removal Co-Benefits
    Tyree, Corey A.
    Allen, Jonathan O.
    POWER, 2010, 154 (07) : 26 - +
  • [38] Modeling the Clean Development Mechanism: Direct benefits, co-benefits and priorities
    Yang, HW
    Kainuma, M
    Matsuoka, Y
    MODELING AND CONTROL IN ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 2001, 2002, : 109 - 114
  • [39] WHAT POLICIES ADDRESSING FOOD SYSTEMS HAVE POTENTIAL CO-BENEFITS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE AND OBESITY IN AUSTRALIA?
    Phan, Tuong-Vi
    Jensen, Henning Tarp
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2021, 51 : 17 - 17
  • [40] Maximising the benefits
    Capes, Phil
    Machinery and Production Engineering, 2002, 160 (4060):