Image-quality metrics for characterizing adaptive optics system performance

被引:14
|
作者
Brigantic, RT
Roggemann, MC
Bauer, KW
Welsh, BM
机构
[1] USAF,INST TECHNOL,DEPT ENGN PHYS,WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB,OH 45433
[2] USAF,INST TECHNOL,DEPT ELECT & COMP ENGN,WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB,OH 45433
来源
APPLIED OPTICS | 1997年 / 36卷 / 26期
关键词
adaptive optics; atmospheric optics; image quality;
D O I
10.1364/AO.36.006583
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Adaptive optics system (AOS) performance is a function of the system design, seeing conditions, and light level of the wave-front beacon. It is desirable to optimize the controllable parameters in an AOS to maximize some measure of performance. For this optimization to be useful, it is necessary that a set of image-quality metrics be developed that vary monotonically with the AOS performance under a wide variety of imaging environments. Accordingly, as conditions change, one can be confident that the computed metrics dictate appropriate system settings that will optimize performance. Three such candidate metrics are presented. The first is the Strehl ratio; the second is a novel metric that modifies the Strehl ratio by integration of the modulus of the average system optical transfer function to a noise-effective cutoff frequency at which some specified image spectrum signal-to-noise ratio level is attained; and the third is simply the cutoff frequency just mentioned. It is shown that all three metrics are correlated with the rms error (RMSE) between the measured image and the associated diffraction-limited image. Of these, the Strehl ratio and the modified Strehl ratio exhibit consistently high correlations with the RMSE across a broad range of conditions and system settings. Furthermore, under conditions that yield a constant average system optical transfer function, the modified Strehl ratio can still be used to delineate image quality, whereas the Strehl ratio cannot.
引用
收藏
页码:6583 / 6593
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SURVEY OF A SEQUENCE OF WORKS ON IMAGE-QUALITY
    GEYER, C
    HARTMANN, J
    HERTEL, J
    KAMMERER, J
    SCHRODER, W
    SCHULZ, HJ
    STATZ, G
    OPTIK, 1969, 29 (01): : 52 - &
  • [22] Repeatability of Adaptive Optics Automated Cone Measurements in Subjects With Retinitis Pigmentosa and Novel Metrics for Assessment of Image Quality
    Gale, Michael J.
    Harman, Gareth A.
    Chen, Jimmy
    Pennesi, Mark E.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 8 (03):
  • [23] CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING IMAGE-GEOMETRY AND IMAGE-QUALITY
    ROSENBRUCH, KJ
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIA, 1977, 33 (05): : 155 - 169
  • [24] On Improving the performance of an Adaptive Optics System
    Mozurkewich, D.
    UV/OPTICAL/IR SPACE TELESCOPES AND INSTRUMENTS: INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND CONCEPTS V, 2011, 8146
  • [25] General image-quality equation: GIQE
    Leachtenauer, Jon C.
    Malila, William
    Irvine, John
    Colburn, Linda
    Salvaggio, Nanette
    Applied Optics, 1997, 36 (32): : 8322 - 8328
  • [26] Enhancing image quality in cleared tissue with adaptive optics
    Reinig, Marc R.
    Novak, Samuel W.
    Tao, Xiaodong
    Bentolila, Laurent A.
    Roberts, Dustin G.
    MacKenzie-Graham, Allan
    Godshalk, Sirie E.
    Raven, Mary A.
    Knowles, David W.
    Kubby, Joel
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2016, 21 (12)
  • [27] Identification of Factors Related to the Enhancement of Image-Quality for Subjective Image-Quality Assessment Model Based on Psychological Measurement
    Aiba, Eriko
    Numata, Koyu
    Fujisawa, Takashi X.
    Nagata, Noriko
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SYSTEM INTERACTION (HSI 2011), 2011, : 174 - 177
  • [28] Limitations to adaptive optics image quality in rodent eyes
    Zhou, Xiaolin
    Bedggood, Phillip
    Metha, Andrew
    BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2012, 3 (08): : 1811 - 1824
  • [29] New image-quality measure based on wavelets
    Dumic, Emil
    Grgic, Sonja
    Grgic, Mislav
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING, 2010, 19 (01)
  • [30] Assessing the Performance of Image Quality Assessment Metrics
    Alotaibi, Theyab
    Bourennani, Farid
    Khan, Ishtiaq Rasool
    IEEE MMSP 2021: 2021 IEEE 23RD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING (MMSP), 2021,