Image-quality metrics for characterizing adaptive optics system performance

被引:14
|
作者
Brigantic, RT
Roggemann, MC
Bauer, KW
Welsh, BM
机构
[1] USAF,INST TECHNOL,DEPT ENGN PHYS,WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB,OH 45433
[2] USAF,INST TECHNOL,DEPT ELECT & COMP ENGN,WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB,OH 45433
来源
APPLIED OPTICS | 1997年 / 36卷 / 26期
关键词
adaptive optics; atmospheric optics; image quality;
D O I
10.1364/AO.36.006583
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Adaptive optics system (AOS) performance is a function of the system design, seeing conditions, and light level of the wave-front beacon. It is desirable to optimize the controllable parameters in an AOS to maximize some measure of performance. For this optimization to be useful, it is necessary that a set of image-quality metrics be developed that vary monotonically with the AOS performance under a wide variety of imaging environments. Accordingly, as conditions change, one can be confident that the computed metrics dictate appropriate system settings that will optimize performance. Three such candidate metrics are presented. The first is the Strehl ratio; the second is a novel metric that modifies the Strehl ratio by integration of the modulus of the average system optical transfer function to a noise-effective cutoff frequency at which some specified image spectrum signal-to-noise ratio level is attained; and the third is simply the cutoff frequency just mentioned. It is shown that all three metrics are correlated with the rms error (RMSE) between the measured image and the associated diffraction-limited image. Of these, the Strehl ratio and the modified Strehl ratio exhibit consistently high correlations with the RMSE across a broad range of conditions and system settings. Furthermore, under conditions that yield a constant average system optical transfer function, the modified Strehl ratio can still be used to delineate image quality, whereas the Strehl ratio cannot.
引用
收藏
页码:6583 / 6593
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wavelength Dependence of Image Quality Metrics and Seeing Parameters and Their Relation to Adaptive Optics Performance
    R. Kamlah
    M. Verma
    A. Diercke
    C. Denker
    Solar Physics, 2021, 296
  • [2] Wavelength Dependence of Image Quality Metrics and Seeing Parameters and Their Relation to Adaptive Optics Performance
    Kamlah, R.
    Verma, M.
    Diercke, A.
    Denker, C.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2021, 296 (02)
  • [3] Do FPDs need new image-quality metrics?
    Rash, Clarence E.
    Klymenko, Victor
    Harding, Thomas H.
    Smith, John S.
    Information Display, 2000, 16 (06)
  • [4] Influence of image-quality degradation on accommodation mechanism in human vision: Conditions necessary for objective image-quality evaluation metrics
    Matsui, Toshikazu
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION DISPLAY, 2012, 20 (07) : 367 - 379
  • [5] Performance of three image-quality metrics in ink-jet printing of plain papers
    Lee, David L.
    Winslow, Alan T.
    Journal of Electronic Imaging, 1993, 2 (03) : 174 - 184
  • [6] On Efficient Assessment of Image-Quality Metrics Based on Linear Model Observers
    Wunderlich, Adam
    Noo, Frederic
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2012, 59 (03) : 568 - 578
  • [7] The use of image quality metrics for correction of non-common path errors in the ELECTRA adaptive optics system
    Doble, N
    Love, G
    Buscher, DF
    Myers, RM
    Purvis, A
    18TH CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR OPTICS: OPTICS FOR THE NEXT MILLENNIUM, TECHNICAL DIGEST, 1999, 3749 : 785 - 786
  • [8] Applicability limitations of differentiable full-reference image-quality metrics
    Siniukov, Maksim
    Kulikov, Dmitriy
    Vatolin, Dmitriy
    2023 DATA COMPRESSION CONFERENCE, DCC, 2023, : 363 - 363
  • [9] USE OF ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC SYSTEM MODEL FOR IMAGE-QUALITY STUDIES
    SPAULDING, KE
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS, 1985, 549 : 50 - 57
  • [10] General image-quality: GIQE
    Leachtenauer, Jon C.
    Malila, William
    Irvine, John
    Colburn, Linda
    Salvaggio, Nanette
    Applied Optics, 1997, 36 (32):