The relative contributions of input and output controls on the performance of a workload control system in Make-To-Order companies

被引:51
|
作者
Kingsman, B [1 ]
Hendry, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Sch Management, Dept Management Sci, Lancaster LA1 4YX, England
关键词
workload control; order review/release; input-output control; order acceptance;
D O I
10.1080/0953728021000026285
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Workload control (WLC) systems can be seen as a natural extension of input-output control systems which allow both the control of jobs into the shop and the control of capacity which affects the flow of finished goods out of the shop. In previous research, it has been shown that WLC can help to reduce manufacturing lead times, even if the total workload processed by the shop in a given time period is maintained at a constant rate. However, the relative contributions of the input control mechanisms versus the output control mechanisms have not been clearly determined. This paper seeks to explore this issue using a simulation of a real job shop, in which the WLC system that has been developed at Lancaster University is used. It explores the use of input control alone and the use of input control plus output control. In addition, the relation between workload and various performance measures, such as lead time, queueing time and capacity utilisation, is explored. The results of the experiments show that one should consider input control and output control as two levers of control that are both to be pulled rather than relying on the single lever of stopping the input when the WIP reaches some preset level.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 590
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Method for control of the make-to-order manufacturing system on the base of earning power assessment
    Ghelase, Daniela
    Daschievici, Luiza
    Marinescu, Vasile
    Epureanu, Alexandru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 65 (9-12): : 1439 - 1458
  • [22] The value of information used in inventory control of a make-to-order inventory-production system
    Hi, QM
    Jewkes, EM
    Buzacott, J
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2002, 34 (11) : 999 - 1013
  • [23] Inventory rationing, admission control, and production capacity allocation in a make-to-stock/make-to-order manufacturing system
    Kim, Eungab
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2025, 32 (03) : 1593 - 1619
  • [24] A human-centric order release method based on workload control in high-variety make-to-order shops towards Industry 5.0
    Ma, Lin
    Zhong, Ray Y.
    Yuan, Mingze
    Ding, Kai
    Thuerer, Matthias
    Pan, Yanghua
    Qu, Ting
    Huang, Geroge Q.
    ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2025, 94
  • [25] PRODUCTION LOGISTICS SYSTEM BASED ON A HYBRID PUSH/PULL CONTROL STRATEGY IN MAKE-TO-ORDER ENVIRONMENTS
    Li, Bo
    Yang, Canjun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2009, 5 (05): : 1343 - 1350
  • [26] THE EFFECTS OF CONTROL ORDER, FEEDBACK, PRACTICE, AND INPUT DEVICE ON TRACKING PERFORMANCE AND PERCEIVED WORKLOAD
    HANCOCK, PA
    ROBINSON, MA
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1989, : 820 - 825
  • [27] Optimal and near-optimal inventory control policies for a make-to-order inventory-production system
    He, QM
    Jewkes, EM
    Buzacott, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 141 (01) : 113 - 132
  • [28] Delivery date decision support system for the large scale make-to-order manufacturing companies: a Korean electric motor company case
    Park, C
    Song, J
    Kim, JG
    Kim, I
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 1999, 10 (06) : 585 - 597
  • [29] Delivery date decision support system for the large scale make-to-order manufacturing companies: A Korean electric motor company case
    Park, Changkyu
    Song, Jungsu
    Kim, Jae-Gyun
    Kim, Insoo
    Production Planning and Control, 1999, 10 (06): : 585 - 597
  • [30] Effects of control order, augmented feedback, input device and practice on tracking performance and perceived workload
    Hancock, PA
    ERGONOMICS, 1996, 39 (09) : 1146 - 1162