Biomaterials in reconstructive middle ear surgery.

被引:0
|
作者
Dost, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, HNO Klin, D-45147 Essen, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Biomaterials are a necessity in modern otosurgery, but none is usefull for all applications. Surface properties, particularly structural characteristics, critically influence the quality of the implant-biological interface. Micropores promote fixation whereas polished surfaces tend to resist it. Prior to the introduction of any new biomaterials, safety precautions must be adhered to rigorously. We showed that osteoblast-like cells grew from human stapedes. This model detected cytotoxicity but it did not show difference in growth when several biomaterials were compared. Hence, animal studies are necessary to evaluate the complicated interactions of mucosa, bone, ventilation and possibly infection with respect to the placement of middle ear prostheses. Nevertheless, animal study results must be interpreted cautiously. In the future therefore, it is clear that rigorously controlled pilot introduction in humans will be required after the biomaterial has passed detailed in-vitro and in-vivo experimental test examinations. The use of plastics often leads to foreign body reaction in the middle ear. Teflon used in stapes prostheses as the only exception, has proved valuable as a result of its low surface energy, and consequently, the avoidance of prosthetic epithelialisation. Most ceramics are biocompatible, but glasses are degradable and therefore of no use in potentially infected ears. Titanium and gold are playing an increasingly important role. However, it should be noted that gold may cause damage to the inner ear, when used as stapes prosthesis. The use of ionomeric cement resulted in fatal complications, when it came in contact with cerebrospinal fluid and consequently, the use of this material has been completely abandoned.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 72
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomaterials for implantable middle ear hearing devices
    Dormer, KJ
    Gan, RZ
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 34 (02) : 289 - +
  • [42] GRAFTING MATERIALS AND METHODS IN RECONSTRUCTIVE EAR SURGERY
    PERKINS, R
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1975, 84 (04): : 518 - 526
  • [43] TRAGAL PERICHONDRIUM AND CARTILAGE IN RECONSTRUCTIVE EAR SURGERY
    EVIATAR, A
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1978, 88 (08): : 1 - 23
  • [44] Reconstructive pelvic surgery. Current status and future perspectives
    Nyarangi-Dix, J. N.
    Djakovic, N.
    Kurosch, M.
    Haferkamp, A.
    Hohenfellner, M.
    UROLOGE, 2009, 48 (05): : 510 - 515
  • [45] Evaluation of surveillance mammography following reconstructive breast surgery.
    Barnsley, P. G.
    Grunfeld, E.
    Coyle, D.
    Paszat, L.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 100 : S18 - S18
  • [46] Plastic and reconstructive breast surgery. Indication and surgical procedure
    Albrecht, Susanne
    Fink, Visnja
    Huesmann, Sophia
    Ernst, Kristina
    De Gregorio, Amelie
    Huober, Jens
    Janni, Wolfgang
    Bekes, Inga
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2019, 52 (06): : 441 - 452
  • [47] Contemporary Plural Deliberations and Perspectives in Revision Middle Ear Surgery. Causes, Outcomes and Lessons Learned
    Pandey, Apoorva Kumar
    Bansal, Chetan
    Gupta, Mudit
    Varma, Arvind
    ul Haq, Ajaz
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 75 (SUPPL 1) : 348 - 356
  • [48] Contemporary Plural Deliberations and Perspectives in Revision Middle Ear Surgery. Causes, Outcomes and Lessons Learned
    Apoorva Kumar Pandey
    Chetan Bansal
    Mudit Gupta
    Arvind Varma
    Ajaz ul Haq
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2023, 75 : 348 - 356
  • [49] SELECTION OF BIOMATERIALS FOR MIDDLE AND INNER-EAR IMPLANTS
    DORMER, KJ
    BRYCE, GE
    HOUGH, JVD
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1995, 28 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [50] POLYETHYLENE IN MIDDLE EAR SURGERY
    HOUSE, HP
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1960, 71 (06): : 926 - 931