Biomaterials in reconstructive middle ear surgery.

被引:0
|
作者
Dost, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, HNO Klin, D-45147 Essen, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Biomaterials are a necessity in modern otosurgery, but none is usefull for all applications. Surface properties, particularly structural characteristics, critically influence the quality of the implant-biological interface. Micropores promote fixation whereas polished surfaces tend to resist it. Prior to the introduction of any new biomaterials, safety precautions must be adhered to rigorously. We showed that osteoblast-like cells grew from human stapedes. This model detected cytotoxicity but it did not show difference in growth when several biomaterials were compared. Hence, animal studies are necessary to evaluate the complicated interactions of mucosa, bone, ventilation and possibly infection with respect to the placement of middle ear prostheses. Nevertheless, animal study results must be interpreted cautiously. In the future therefore, it is clear that rigorously controlled pilot introduction in humans will be required after the biomaterial has passed detailed in-vitro and in-vivo experimental test examinations. The use of plastics often leads to foreign body reaction in the middle ear. Teflon used in stapes prostheses as the only exception, has proved valuable as a result of its low surface energy, and consequently, the avoidance of prosthetic epithelialisation. Most ceramics are biocompatible, but glasses are degradable and therefore of no use in potentially infected ears. Titanium and gold are playing an increasingly important role. However, it should be noted that gold may cause damage to the inner ear, when used as stapes prosthesis. The use of ionomeric cement resulted in fatal complications, when it came in contact with cerebrospinal fluid and consequently, the use of this material has been completely abandoned.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 72
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality control following reconstructive middle ear surgery. From bench to bedside
    Offergeld, C.
    HNO, 2013, 61 (12) : 1011 - 1016
  • [2] Total middle ear reconstructive surgery for the radicalized ear
    Ishimoto, S
    Ito, K
    Sasaki, T
    Shinogami, M
    Kaga, K
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2002, 23 (03) : 262 - 266
  • [3] Unsolved problems in middle ear surgery.
    Huettenbrink, K. -B.
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2010, 89 (11) : 709 - 710
  • [4] Thermographic studies in middle ear surgery.
    Pau, HW
    Fichelmann, J
    Wild, W
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 1998, 77 (12) : 677 - 681
  • [5] PRESENT CONCEPTS OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MIDDLE EAR SURGERY
    SADE, J
    EYE EAR NOSE AND THROAT MONTHLY, 1967, 46 (09): : 1121 - &
  • [6] Inactivated homografts in reconstructive middle ear surgery
    Hotz, MA
    Orr, T
    Spiers, AD
    Häusler, R
    FUNCTION AND MECHANICS OF NORMAL, DISEASED AND RECONSTRUCTED MIDDLE EARS, 2000, : 225 - 230
  • [7] RECONSTRUCTIVE MIDDLE EAR SURGERY - SOME OF COMPLICATIONS
    SMYTH, GDL
    KERR, AG
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1974, 3 (01) : 7 - 12
  • [8] EXPERIMENTAL RECONSTRUCTIVE MIDDLE-EAR SURGERY
    GROTE, JJ
    KUYPERS, W
    VANDERBROEK, P
    ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES, 1976, 38 (06): : 359 - 359
  • [9] MULTIDIRECTIONAL TOMOGRAPHY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE MIDDLE-EAR SURGERY
    WILBRAND, HF
    EKVALL, L
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA-DIAGNOSIS, 1975, 16 (05): : 436 - 448
  • [10] DIMENSIONS OF IMPORTANCE IN RECONSTRUCTIVE MIDDLE-EAR SURGERY
    TJELLSTROM, A
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1977, 83 (5-6) : 488 - 490