Effect of antenatal steroid administration on the fetal biophysical profile

被引:0
|
作者
Kelly, MK
Schneider, EP
Petrikovsky, BM
Lesser, ML
机构
[1] N Shore Univ Hosp, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
[2] Nassau Cty Med Ctr, E Meadow, NY 11554 USA
关键词
antenatal steroids; fetal biophysical profile; fetal assessment; Doppler ultrasonography;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(200006)28:5<224::AID-JCU3>3.0.CO;2-G
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Purpose. Our objective was to determine whether antenatal steroid administration affects the biophysical profile score in fetuses. Methods. A prospective study was conducted in 84 fetuses between 28 and 34 weeks' menstrual age at risk of preterm delivery. Two intramuscular injections of 12 mg of betamethasone were given to the mother 24 hours apart. All fetuses underwent biophysical profile testing prior to and between 24 and 48 hours after steroid administration. Biophysical profiles (including nonstress tests) were evaluated by two maternal-fetal medicine specialists blinded to the timing of steroid administration. Neonatal outcome, including Apgar score, menstrual age at delivery, admission to and length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit, and mortality, was analyzed in all subjects. Results. In 31 (37%; 95 confidence interval, 26.6-47.2%) of 84 cases, the biophysical profile score decreased at least 2 points after steroid administration. The most commonly affected variables were fetal breathing and the nonstress test. There was no significant difference in the neonatal outcome between the fetuses whose biophysical profile decreased and those whose did not. Conclusions. Biophysical profile scores were decreased in more than one third of fetuses within 48 hours of antenatal steroid administration, but neonatal outcome was not affected. Knowledge of this occurrence could avoid incorrect decision making regarding fetal well-being. (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 226
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of antenatal steroid treatment on fetal autonomic heart rate regulation revealed by fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG)
    Schneider, Uwe
    Fiedler, Anja
    Schroeder, Beatrix
    Jaekel, Susann
    Stacke, Angelika
    Hoyer, Dirk
    Schleussner, Ekkehard
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 86 (05) : 319 - 325
  • [32] Effect of repetitive antenatal steroid
    Thorp, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : 2178 - 2179
  • [33] Fetal biophysical profile in the assessment of fetal hypoxia - clinical value
    Habek, D
    Hodek, B
    Herman, R
    Maticevic, A
    Jugovic, D
    Salihagic, A
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2000, 102 (04) : 373 - 378
  • [34] The role of the fetal biophysical profile in the management of fetal growth restriction
    Baschat, Ahmet A.
    Galan, Henry L.
    Lee, Wesley
    DeVore, Greggory R.
    Mari, Giancarlo
    Hobbins, John
    Vintzileos, Anthony
    Platt, Lawrence D.
    Manning, Frank A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (04) : 475 - 486
  • [35] ANTEPARTUM FETAL ASSESSMENT USING A FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE SCORE
    BASKETT, TF
    GRAY, JH
    PREWETT, SJ
    YOUNG, LM
    ALLEN, AC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 148 (05) : 630 - 633
  • [36] Fetal congenital malformations - Biophysical profile evaluation
    Lin, CC
    Adamczyk, CJ
    Sheikh, Z
    Mittendorf, R
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 43 (06) : 521 - 527
  • [37] THE FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE AND ITS PREDICTIVE VALUE
    VINTZILEOS, AM
    CAMPBELL, WA
    INGARDIA, CJ
    NOCHIMSON, DJ
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1983, 62 (03): : 271 - 278
  • [38] Fetal biophysical profile in premature rupture of the membranes
    Moraes, VA
    Bertini, AM
    4TH WORLD CONGRESS OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1999, : 187 - 190
  • [39] IS FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE WITH ALL PARAMETERS NEEDED
    OCAK, V
    SEN, C
    MADAZLI, R
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL INVESTIGATION, 1994, 4 (01): : 37 - 41
  • [40] FETAL DEATH AFTER NORMAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE
    WATSON, WJ
    KATZ, VL
    BOWES, WA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1991, 8 (02) : 94 - 96