Measurement of muscle contraction timing for prosthesis control: a comparison between electromyography and force-myography

被引:19
|
作者
Esposito, Daniele [1 ]
Gargiulo, Gaetano Dario [2 ]
Parajuli, Nawadita [2 ]
Cesarelli, Giuseppe [3 ]
Andreozzi, Emilio [1 ]
Bifulco, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Polytech & Basic Sci Sch, Dept Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Naples, Italy
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Comp Engn & Math, Penrith, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Chem Mat & Prod Engn, Naples, Italy
关键词
Electromyography (EMG); active prosthesis control; muscle contraction monitoring; Force Sensitive Resistor (FSR) sensor; FSR vs EMG comparison; HUMAN SKELETAL-MUSCLE; ELECTROMECHANICAL DELAY; EMG;
D O I
10.1109/memea49120.2020.9137313
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Active hand prostheses are usually controlled by electromyography (EMG) signals acquired from few muscles available in the residual limb. In general, it is necessary to estimate the envelope of the EMG in real-time to implement the control of the prosthesis. Recently, sensors based on Force Sensitive Resistor (FSR) proved to be a valid alternative to monitor muscle contraction. However, FSR-based sensors measure the mechanical phenomena related to muscle contraction rather than those electrical. The aim of this study is to test the difference between the EMG and force signal in controlling a prosthetic hand. Particular emphasis has been placed on verify the prosthesis activation speed and their application to fast grabbing hand prosthesis as the "Federica" hand. Indeed, there is an intrinsic electro-mechanical delay during muscle contraction, since the electrical activation of muscle fibres always precedes their mechanical contraction. However, the EMG signal needs to be processed to control prosthesis and such filtering unavoidably causes a delay. On the contrary the force signal doesn't need any processing. Both EMG and force signals were simultaneously recorded from the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle, while subject performed wrist flexions. The raw EMG signals were rectified and low-pass filtered to extract their envelopes. Different widespread operators were used: Moving Average, Root Mean Square, Butterworth low-pass; the cut-off frequency was set to 5 Hz. Afterward, a classic double threshold method was used to compute the muscle contraction onsets (i.e. the signal should exceed a threshold level for a certain time period). Results showed that the lag introduced by the low-pass filtering of the rectified EMG, generates delays greater than those associated with the force sensor. This analysis confirms the possibility of using force sensors as a convenient alternative to EMG signals in the control of prostheses.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The relation between force magnitude, force steadiness, and muscle co-contraction in the thumb during precision grip
    Danion, F
    Galléa, C
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2004, 368 (02) : 176 - 180
  • [42] Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reduces the Silent Period on Hand Muscle Electromyography During Force Control
    Matsugi, Akiyoshi
    Douchi, Shinya
    Suzuki, Kodai
    Oku, Kosuke
    Mori, Nobuhiko
    Tanaka, Hiroaki
    Nishishita, Satoru
    Bando, Kyota
    Kikuchi, Yutaka
    Okada, Yohei
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (02)
  • [43] Influence of inter-electrode distance, contraction type, and muscle on the relationship between the sEMG power spectrum and contraction force
    Rodriguez-Falces, Javier
    Neyroud, Daria
    Place, Nicolas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 115 (03) : 627 - 638
  • [44] Influence of inter-electrode distance, contraction type, and muscle on the relationship between the sEMG power spectrum and contraction force
    Javier Rodriguez-Falces
    Daria Neyroud
    Nicolas Place
    European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2015, 115 : 627 - 638
  • [45] A Comparison Between Two Models of Shoulder Muscle Force Estimation
    Ribeiro, Daniel Cury
    de Toledo, Joelly Mahnic
    Krug, Roberto Costa
    Loss, Jefferson Fagundes
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2009, 25 (01) : 43 - 53
  • [46] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MATHEMATICAL-MODELS FOR FORCE-VELOCITY RELATION IN MUSCLE-CONTRACTION
    SUKOP, J
    REISENAU.R
    PHYSIOLOGIA BOHEMOSLOVACA, 1973, 22 (01): : 96 - 96
  • [47] A comparison among different Hill-type contraction dynamics formulations for muscle force estimation
    Romero, F.
    Alonso, F. J.
    MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 7 (01) : 19 - 29
  • [48] Simultaneous Measurement of Ear Canal Movement, Electromyography of the Masseter Muscle and Occlusal Force for Earphone-Type Occlusal Force Estimation Device Development
    Kurosawa, Mami
    Taniguchi, Kazuhiro
    Momose, Hideya
    Sakaguchi, Masao
    Kamijo, Masayoshi
    Nishikawa, Atsushi
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (15)
  • [49] Comparison of respiratory muscle recruitments between maximal voluntary contraction and strenuous exercise
    Santana, Pauliane
    Cardenas, Leticia
    Pletsch, Renata
    Ferreira, Jeferson
    Orlandim, Luiz
    Andre, Albuquerque
    Carlos, Carvalho
    Trevizan, Patricia
    Maloni, Renan
    Caruso, Pedro
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 42
  • [50] Hip muscle co-contraction: evidence from concurrent in vivo pressure measurement and force estimation
    Park, S
    Krebs, DE
    Mann, RW
    GAIT & POSTURE, 1999, 10 (03) : 211 - 222