共 50 条
Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
被引:81
|作者:
Crino, Stefano Francesco
[1
]
Ammendola, Serena
[2
]
Meneghetti, Anna
[1
]
Bernardoni, Laura
[1
]
Bellocchi, Maria Cristina Conti
[1
]
Gabbrielli, Armando
[1
]
Landoni, Luca
[3
]
Paiella, Salvatore
[3
]
Pin, Federico
[1
]
Parisi, Alice
[2
]
Mastrosimini, Maria Gaia
[2
]
Amodio, Antonio
[1
]
Frulloni, Luca
[1
]
Facciorusso, Antonio
[4
]
Larghi, Alberto
[5
]
Manfrin, Erminia
[2
]
机构:
[1] GB Rossi Univ Hosp, Pancreas Inst, Gastroenterol & Digest Endoscopy Unit, Verona, Italy
[2] GB Rossi Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Publ Hlth, Verona, Italy
[3] Univ Verona Hosp Trust, Pancreas Inst, Dept Gen & Pancreat Surg, Verona, Italy
[4] Univ Foggia, Dept Med Sci, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Foggia, Italy
[5] IRCCS, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, Rome, Italy
关键词:
Ki-67 proliferative index;
Pancreatic surgery;
Small pNET;
Endoscopic ultrasound tissue acquisition;
D O I:
10.1016/j.pan.2020.12.015
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background/objectives: Studies comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are lacking. We aimed at comparing EUS-FNA with EUS-FNB in terms of Ki-67 proliferative index (PI) estimation capability, cellularity of the samples, and reliability of Ki-67 PI/tumor grading compared with surgical specimens. Methods: Patients diagnosed with pNETs on EUS and/or surgical specimens were retrospectively identified. Specimens were re-evaluated to assess Ki-67 PI feasibility, sample cellularity by manual counting, and determination of Ki-67 PI value. Outcomes in the EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB groups were compared. Kendall rank test was used for Ki-67 PI correlation between EUS and surgical specimens. Subgroup analysis including small (<= 20 mm), non-functioning pNETs was performed. Results: Three-hundred samples from 292 lesions were evaluated: 69 EUS-FNA cytology and 231 EUS-FNB histology. Ki-67 PI feasibility was similar for EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB (91.3% vs. 95.7%, p = 0.15), while EUS-FNB performed significantly better in the subgroup of 179 small pNETs (88.2% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.04). Rate of poor cellulated (<500 cells) specimens was equal between EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB. A significant correlation for Ki-67 PI values between EUS and 92 correspondent surgical specimens was found in both groups, but it was stronger with EUS-FNB (tau = 0.626, p < 0.0001 vs. tau = 0.452, p = 0.031). Correct grading estimation was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.482). Conclusion: Our study showed stronger correlation for Ki-67 values between EUS-FNB and surgical specimens, and that EUS-FNB outperformed EUS-FNA in the evaluation of small pNETs. EUS-FNB should become standard of care for grading assessment of suspected pNETs. (C) 2020 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 450
页数:8
相关论文