Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

被引:81
|
作者
Crino, Stefano Francesco [1 ]
Ammendola, Serena [2 ]
Meneghetti, Anna [1 ]
Bernardoni, Laura [1 ]
Bellocchi, Maria Cristina Conti [1 ]
Gabbrielli, Armando [1 ]
Landoni, Luca [3 ]
Paiella, Salvatore [3 ]
Pin, Federico [1 ]
Parisi, Alice [2 ]
Mastrosimini, Maria Gaia [2 ]
Amodio, Antonio [1 ]
Frulloni, Luca [1 ]
Facciorusso, Antonio [4 ]
Larghi, Alberto [5 ]
Manfrin, Erminia [2 ]
机构
[1] GB Rossi Univ Hosp, Pancreas Inst, Gastroenterol & Digest Endoscopy Unit, Verona, Italy
[2] GB Rossi Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Publ Hlth, Verona, Italy
[3] Univ Verona Hosp Trust, Pancreas Inst, Dept Gen & Pancreat Surg, Verona, Italy
[4] Univ Foggia, Dept Med Sci, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Foggia, Italy
[5] IRCCS, Digest Endoscopy Unit, Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, Rome, Italy
关键词
Ki-67 proliferative index; Pancreatic surgery; Small pNET; Endoscopic ultrasound tissue acquisition;
D O I
10.1016/j.pan.2020.12.015
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/objectives: Studies comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are lacking. We aimed at comparing EUS-FNA with EUS-FNB in terms of Ki-67 proliferative index (PI) estimation capability, cellularity of the samples, and reliability of Ki-67 PI/tumor grading compared with surgical specimens. Methods: Patients diagnosed with pNETs on EUS and/or surgical specimens were retrospectively identified. Specimens were re-evaluated to assess Ki-67 PI feasibility, sample cellularity by manual counting, and determination of Ki-67 PI value. Outcomes in the EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB groups were compared. Kendall rank test was used for Ki-67 PI correlation between EUS and surgical specimens. Subgroup analysis including small (<= 20 mm), non-functioning pNETs was performed. Results: Three-hundred samples from 292 lesions were evaluated: 69 EUS-FNA cytology and 231 EUS-FNB histology. Ki-67 PI feasibility was similar for EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB (91.3% vs. 95.7%, p = 0.15), while EUS-FNB performed significantly better in the subgroup of 179 small pNETs (88.2% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.04). Rate of poor cellulated (<500 cells) specimens was equal between EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB. A significant correlation for Ki-67 PI values between EUS and 92 correspondent surgical specimens was found in both groups, but it was stronger with EUS-FNB (tau = 0.626, p < 0.0001 vs. tau = 0.452, p = 0.031). Correct grading estimation was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.482). Conclusion: Our study showed stronger correlation for Ki-67 values between EUS-FNB and surgical specimens, and that EUS-FNB outperformed EUS-FNA in the evaluation of small pNETs. EUS-FNB should become standard of care for grading assessment of suspected pNETs. (C) 2020 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 450
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A prospective evaluation of the incidence of bacteremia associated with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration
    Barawi, M
    Gottlieb, K
    Cunha, B
    Portis, M
    Gress, F
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 53 (02) : 189 - 192
  • [22] EUS with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration as the first endoscopic test for the evaluation of obstructive jaundice
    Erickson, RA
    Garza, AA
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 53 (04) : 475 - 484
  • [23] Technique and status of EUS-guided fine-needle injection
    Chang, Kenneth J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (02) : S192 - S193
  • [24] EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a case
    Fritscher-Ravens, A
    Broering, DC
    Sriram, PVJ
    Topalidis, T
    Jaeckle, S
    Thonke, F
    Soehendra, N
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (04) : 534 - 540
  • [25] A Comparison of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Fine Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
    Ayres, Lachlan R.
    Kmiotek, Elizabeth
    Lam, Eric
    Telford, Jennifer J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB358 - AB358
  • [26] Harmonic EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of small cholangiocarcinoma (with video)
    Rana, Surinder Singh
    Bush, Nikhil
    Gupta, Rajesh
    ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND, 2022, 11 (05) : 416 - 417
  • [27] Diagnosis of recurrent rectal carcinoma by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration
    Woodward, T
    Menke, D
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (02) : 223 - 225
  • [28] Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of liver lesions
    Nguyen, P
    Feng, JC
    Chang, KJ
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 50 (03) : 357 - 361
  • [29] Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the left adrenal gland
    Chang, KJ
    Erickson, RA
    Nguyen, P
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (05) : 568 - 572
  • [30] Impact of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration on the management of pancreatic cystic lesions
    Rodriguez-D'Jesus, Antonio
    Fernandez-Esparrach, Gloria
    Boadas, Jaume
    Busquets, Juli
    Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano
    Ferrer, Joana
    Vaquero, Eva C.
    Molero, Xavier
    Navarro, Salvador
    Sanchez-Cabus, Santiago
    Araujo, Isis K.
    Sendino, Oriol
    Cordova, Henry
    Sanchez-Montes, Cristina
    Gines, Angels
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 28 (09) : 1094 - 1099