The filter checker: An active verification management approach

被引:0
|
作者
Yoo, Joonhyuk [1 ]
Franklin, Manoj [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/DFT.2006.64
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Dynamic verification architectures provide fault detection by employing a simple checker processor that dynamically checks the computations of a complex processor. For dynamic verification to be viable, the checker processor must keep up with the retirement throughput of the core processor. However, the overall throughput would be limited if the checker processor is neither fast nor wide enough to keep up with the core processor. We investigate the impact of checker bandwidth on performance. As a solution for the checker's congestion, we propose an Active Verification Management (AVM) approach with a filter checker. The goal of AVM is to reduce overloaded verification in the checker with a congestion avoidance policy and to minimize the performance degradation caused by congestion. Before the verification process starts at the checker processor, a filter checker marks a Correctness Non-criticality Indicator (CNI) bit in advance to indicate how likely these pre-computed results are to be unimportant for reliability. Then AVM decides how to deal with the marked instructions by using a congestion avoidance policy. Both reactive and proactive congestion avoidance policies are proposed to skip the verification process at the checker. Our results show that the proposed AVM has the potential to solve the verification congestion problem when perfect fault coverage is not needed. With no AVM, congestion at the checker badly affects performance, to the tune of 57%, when compared to that of a non-fault-tolerant processor. With good marking by AVM, the performance of a reliable processor approaches 95% of that of a non-fault-tolerant processor. Although instructions can be skipped on a random basis, such an approach reduces the fault coverage. A filter checker with a marking policy correlated with the correctness non-criticality metric, on the other hand, significantly reduces the soft error rate. Finally, we also present results showing the trade-off between performance and reliability.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:516 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A novel approach to active power filter control
    Palandöken, M
    Tümay, M
    Aksoy, M
    ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 87 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [22] A novel approach to active power filter control
    Merih Palandöken
    Mehmet Tümay
    Murat Aksoy
    Electrical Engineering, 2005, 87 : 33 - 39
  • [23] Probabilistic approach for active control of structures: Experimental verification
    Hwang, JS
    Min, KW
    Lee, SH
    Kim, HJ
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2005, 34 (03): : 207 - 225
  • [24] Modeling, Verification and Testing of Web Applications Using Model Checker
    Homma, Kei
    Izumi, Satoru
    Takahashi, Kaoru
    Togashi, Atsushi
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEMS, 2011, E94D (05): : 989 - 999
  • [25] SVA Checker Generator for FPGA-Based Verification Platform
    Mohamad, Nurita
    Ooi, Chia Yee
    Ismail, Nordinah
    Teh, Jwing
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS), 2016, : 1750 - 1753
  • [26] Verification of an off-line checker tor priority queues
    de Nivelle, H
    Piskac, R
    SEFM 2005: Third IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, Proceedings, 2005, : 210 - 219
  • [27] MCMAS: A Model Checker for the Verification of Multi-Agent Systems
    Lomuscio, Alessio
    Qu, Hongyang
    Raimondi, Franco
    COMPUTER AIDED VERIFICATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5643 : 682 - +
  • [28] Verification of C++ flight software with the MCP model checker
    Thompson, S.
    Brat, G.
    2008 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-9, 2008, : 3358 - 3366
  • [29] Delcam launches NC-Checker for machine tool verification
    不详
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 81 (04): : 375 - 375
  • [30] FACT: A Probabilistic Model Checker for Formal Verification with Confidence Intervals
    Calinescu, Radu
    Johnson, Kenneth
    Paterson, Colin
    TOOLS AND ALGORITHMS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS (TACAS 2016), 2016, 9636 : 540 - 546