Comparison between and evaluation of some methods for the assessment of the sphericity of pellets

被引:25
|
作者
Eriksson, M
Alderborn, G
Nystrom, C
Podczeck, F
Newton, JM
机构
[1] UNIV UPPSALA,DEPT PHARM,S-75123 UPPSALA,SWEDEN
[2] UNIV LONDON,SCH PHARM,DEPT PHARMACEUT,LONDON WC1N 1AX,ENGLAND
关键词
air permeametry; aspect ratio; eccentricity factor; Heywood shape factor; image-analysis; one-plane critical stability; pellets; shape analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-5173(96)04845-4
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The shape of pellets, prepared by extrusion-spheronisation, has been assessed by the analysis of the two-dimensional images in the form of an elongation ratio (direct microscopic measurement), aspect ratio (image analysis), one-plane critical stability (OPCS) and a shape factor e(R) (Podczeck and Newton, 1994) plus 3-dimensional characterisation by the Heywood shape coefficient and a permeametry shape factor (Eriksson et al., 1993). Steel ball bearings were used as a standard for each of the methods. The elongation and aspect ratio proved to be poor methods of distinguishing between the variations in shape of pellets within a batch nor particularly sensitive to measure differences between batches. OPCS and the shape factor, e(R), were more distinguishing in terms of detecting batch differences and inter-batch differences. The two-dimensional image methods ranked the batches in equivalent order of ranking. The Heywood shape coefficient gave the same ranking but the permeametry shape factor gave a significantly different ranking which could be associated with the surface texture of the spheres. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 154
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE EVALUATION OF A 3-DIMENSIONAL SHAPE FACTOR FOR THE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE SPHERICITY AND SURFACE-ROUGHNESS OF PELLETS
    PODCZECK, F
    NEWTON, JM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 1995, 124 (02) : 253 - 259
  • [2] DETERMINATION OF SPHERICITY OF PELLETS PREPARED BY EXTRUSION SPHERONIZATION AND THE IMPACT OF SOME PROCESS PARAMETERS
    LOVGREN, K
    LUNDBERG, PJ
    DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 1989, 15 (14-16) : 2375 - 2392
  • [3] Analysis and Comparison of some Threat Assessment methods
    Zhao Xin-shuang
    Wang Hou-xiang
    Cai Yi-chao
    2013 25TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2013, : 1703 - 1705
  • [4] A COMPARISON OF SOME METHODS OF BEEF CARCASS EVALUATION
    SCOTT, BM
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1967, 9 : 276 - &
  • [5] Assessment of oil polarity: Comparison of evaluation methods
    El-Mahrab-Roberta, M.
    Rosilio, V.
    Bolzinger, M. -A.
    Chaminade, P.
    Grossiord, J. -L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2008, 348 (1-2) : 89 - 94
  • [7] A comparison of some methods for the evaluation of highly oscillatory integrals
    Evans, GA
    Webster, JR
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1999, 112 (1-2) : 55 - 69
  • [8] Evaluation of nasal cytology: a comparison between methods
    Piacentini, GL
    Kaulbach, H
    Scott, T
    Kaliner, MA
    ALLERGY, 1998, 53 (03) : 326 - 328
  • [9] Comparison of four anthropometric methods of nutritional assessment and evaluation of the agreement between two reference populations
    de Almeida, CAN
    Ricco, RG
    Nogueira, MPC
    Del Ciampo, LA
    Mucillo, G
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 1999, 45 (06) : 345 - 350
  • [10] A comparison of nondestructive evaluation methods for bridge deck assessment
    Scott, M
    Rezaizadeh, A
    Delahaza, A
    Santos, CG
    Moore, M
    Graybeal, B
    Washer, G
    NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 36 (04) : 245 - 255