Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors

被引:14
|
作者
Meliti, Abdelrazak [1 ]
Sadimin, Evita [1 ]
Diolombi, Mario [1 ]
Khani, Francesca [1 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, 401 N Broadway St,Rm 2242, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Oncol, 401 N Broadway St,Rm 2242, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
来源
PROSTATE | 2017年 / 77卷 / 06期
关键词
prostate cancer; gleason grading; percent pattern 4; interobserver; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; INTEROBSERVER-REPRODUCIBILITY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; UROLOGIC-PATHOLOGISTS; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; GENERAL PATHOLOGISTS; CANCER; CARCINOMA; IMPROVES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/pros.23314
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDRecognition of Gleason pattern 4 in prostatic needle biopsies is crucial for both prognosis and therapy. Recently, it has been recommended to record percent pattern 4 when Gleason score 7 cancer is the highest grade in a case. METHODSFour hundred and five prostate needle core biopsies received for a second opinion at our institution from February-June, 2015 were prospectively diagnosed with prostatic adenocarcinoma Gleason score 7 as the highest score on review by a consultant urological pathologist. Percentage of core involvement by cancer, percentage of Gleason pattern 4 per core, distribution of Gleason pattern 4 (clustered, scattered), morphology of pattern 4 (cribriform, non-cribriform), and whether the cancer was continuous or discontinuous were recorded. RESULTSBetter agreement was noted between the consultant and referring pathologists when pattern 4 was clustered as opposed to dispersed in biopsies (P=0.009). The percentage of core involvement by cancer, morphology of pattern 4, and continuity of cancer did not affect the agreement between the consultant and referring pathologists. There was a trend (P=0.06) for better agreement based on the percent of pattern 4. CONCLUSIONSWhen pattern 4 is scattered amongst pattern 3 as opposed to being discrete foci, there is less interobserver reproducibility in grading Gleason score 7 cancer, and in this setting pathologists should consider obtaining second opinions either internally within their group or externally. Prostate 77: 681-685, 2017. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 685
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Correlation between cribriform/intraductal prostatic adenocarcinoma and percent Gleason pattern 4 to a 22-gene genomic classifier
    Taylor, Alexander S.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Wallington, David G.
    Chinnaiyan, Arul M.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Mehra, Rohit
    PROSTATE, 2020, 80 (02): : 146 - 152
  • [22] Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Cancer With Minimal Quantity of Gleason Pattern 4 on Needle Biopsy Is Associated With Low-risk Tumor in Radical Prostatectomy Specimen
    Huang, Cheng Cheng
    Kong, Max Xiangtian
    Zhou, Ming
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 38 (08) : 1096 - 1101
  • [23] Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on Needle Biopsy: Relation of Primary Pattern 3 or 4 to Pathological Stage and Progression After Radical Prostatectomy
    Amin, Ali
    Partin, Alan
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04): : 1286 - 1290
  • [24] Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Cancer with Minimal Pattern 4 Identified in Prostate Needle Biopsy Barely has Worse Pathological Outcomes
    Serrano, Antonio
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Ren, Qinghu
    Huang, Hongying
    Park, Kyung
    Flaifel, Abdallah
    Deng, Fangming
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (SUPPL 2) : 969 - 971
  • [25] Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Cancer with Minimal Pattern 4 Identified in Prostate Needle Biopsy Barely has Worse Pathological Outcomes
    Serrano, Antonio
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Ren, Qinghu
    Huang, Hongying
    Park, Kyung
    Flaifel, Abdallah
    Deng, Fangming
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2020, 100 (SUPPL 1) : 969 - 971
  • [26] Morphometric Signature Differences in Nuclei of Gleason Pattern 4 Areas in Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer With Differing Primary Grades on Needle Biopsy
    Venkataraman, Girish
    Rycyna, Kevin
    Rabanser, Alexander
    Heinze, Georg
    Baesens, Bart M. M.
    Ananthanarayanan, Vijayalakshmi
    Paner, Gladell P.
    Barkan, Gueliz A.
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    Wojcik, Eva M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (01): : 88 - 93
  • [27] Acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate: Gleason pattern 4 quantification and morphology in needle biopsy and their relationship with findings in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Athartazio, D.
    da Silva, M. T.
    do Amaral, M. E. Pompeu
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 : S222 - S222
  • [28] Cases Having a Gleason Score 3+4=7 With <5% of Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostate Needle Biopsy Show Similar Failure-free Survival and Adverse Pathology Prevalence to Gleason Score 6 Cases in a Radical Prostatectomy Cohort
    Sato, Shun
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Yorozu, Takashi
    Onuma, Hajime
    Iwatani, Kosuke
    Egawa, Shin
    Ikegami, Masahiro
    Takahashi, Hiroyuki
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 43 (11) : 1560 - 1565
  • [29] Gleason score 7 on needle biopsy: Is the prognostic difference between Gleason scores 4+3 and 3+4 independent of the number of involved cores?
    Makarov, DV
    Sanderson, H
    Partin, AW
    Epstein, JI
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2002, 82 (01) : 172A - 173A
  • [30] Gleason score 7 on needle biopsy: Is the prognostic difference between Gleason scores 4+3 and 3+4 independent of the number of involved cores?
    Makarov, DV
    Sanderson, H
    Partin, AW
    Epstein, JI
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) : 172A - 173A