Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of container-based single-family housing in Canada: A case study

被引:44
|
作者
Dara, Chinyere [1 ]
Hachem-Vermette, Caroline [1 ]
Assefa, Getachew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Sch Architecture Planning & Landscape, SECDL, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Sch Architecture Planning & Landscape, PF 3197,2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Shipping container; Passive solar design; Environmental impacts; Sensitivity analysis; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENERGY ANALYSIS; BUILDINGS; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSTRUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; ENVELOPE; SUBSTITUTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106332
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This research presents an early-design analysis of single-family housing located in Calgary, Canada; and combines energy analysis, life cycle assessment (LCA), and life-cycle costing (LCC), to investigate the life cycle impacts associated with repurposing upcycled containers into modular housing. The study considers four case studies; container and lightwood designed to code specifications, both serving as base models and two improved models of container and lightwood, designed by incorporating energy efficiency measures and passive solar design standards. The life cycle assessment results for the code cases clearly show that majority of the life cycle environmental impacts (95%) occur at the use and operation phase, followed by the pre-use contributing 4%, and less than 1% at the end of life. For the improved cases, results show similar findings as the use and operation phase contributes approximately 85% impact, however, a higher pre-use impact of 12% is reported. Over the 50 years lifespan, the comparative life cycle impacts show only 3% difference when comparing container to lightwood cases. Sensitivity analysis show that utilizing Scenario 100:0 (container code-cut-of-method) in housing can result in a substantial amount of avoided impact about 46 (t CO2 eq) and (538 GJ) 149,444 kWh energy savings as compared to Scenario 0:100 (improved container - end of life recycling). Approximately 10% life cycle cost reduction is realized with the improved cases compared to code cases. This study proves the potentials for repurposing container for long-term usage as a building system, thereby meeting affordable housing needs with less environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of a single-family residential building in Canada: A case study
    Zhang, Weiqian
    Tan, Shen
    Lei, Yizhong
    Wang, Shoubing
    [J]. BUILDING SIMULATION, 2014, 7 (04) : 429 - 438
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of a single-family residential building in Canada: A case study
    Weiqian Zhang
    Shen Tan
    Yizhong Lei
    Shoubing Wang
    [J]. Building Simulation, 2014, 7 : 429 - 438
  • [3] Comparative life cycle assessment of various energy efficiency designs of a container-based housing unit in China: A case study
    Satola, D.
    Kristiansen, A. B.
    Houlihan-Wiberg, A.
    Gustavsen, A.
    Ma, T.
    Wang, R. Z.
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 186 (186)
  • [4] A case-based study on the use of life cycle assessment and life cycle costing in the building industry
    Collin, C.
    Olesen, G. G. H.
    Secher, Qvist A.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT D-A-CH CONFERENCE 2019 (SBE19 GRAZ), 2019, 323
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of a wooden single-family house in Sweden
    Petrovic, Bojana
    Myhren, Jonn Are
    Zhang, Xingxing
    Wallhagen, Marita
    Eriksson, Ola
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 251
  • [6] Study on integrated method of life cycle assessment and life cycle costing
    State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    [J]. Zhongguo Jixie Gongcheng, 2007, 15 (1804-1809):
  • [7] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of sanitary ware manufacturing: A case study in China
    Lv, Jingxiang
    Gu, Fu
    Zhang, Wujie
    Guo, Jianfeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 238
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment of Building Materials for a Single-family House in Sweden
    Petroyic, Bojana
    Myhren, Jonn Are
    Zhang, Xingxing
    Wallhagen, Marita
    Eriksson, Ola
    [J]. INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS, 2019, 158 : 3547 - 3552
  • [9] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach for building decarbonization by design choices: A case study
    Umdu, Emin Selahattin
    Yildirim, Nurdan
    Guzel, Poyraz
    Alakavuk, Ebru
    Umdu, Duygu Cinar
    [J]. ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 6 (03)
  • [10] Optimum Envelope of a Single-Family House Based on Life Cycle Analysis
    Hamelin, Marie-Claude
    Zmeureanu, Radu
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2014, 4 (02): : 95 - 112