Sex Differences in the Risk of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Induced by Antiseizure Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Alfares, Israa [1 ]
Javaid, Muhammad Shahid [2 ]
Chen, Zhibin [2 ]
Anderson, Alison [2 ]
Antonic-Baker, Ana [2 ]
Kwan, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Melbourne Brain Ctr, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Cent Clin Sch, Dept Neurosci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
TOXIC EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS; STEVENS-JOHNSON-SYNDROME; ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CROSS-REACTIVITY; RASH; AGE; PHARMACOKINETICS; PHARMACOGENOMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s40263-021-00794-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) are one of the most common, severe, and life-threatening types of adverse reactions following treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs). Some studies have reported a higher incidence of ASM-induced cADRs in females than in males. Objective This study sought to perform a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression to compare the ASM cADR risks between females and males. Methods We searched the literature using three databases (EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science) between October 1998 and November 2018, later updated to October 2019. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they met the following criteria: (1) observational studies that estimated the incidence of cADRs related to ASMs; (2) provided the risk or odds ratio (OR) for cADRs among female and male patients exposed to ASMs; and (3) provided information on patients' characteristics. We assessed the impact of study characteristics, publication bias, and measures to reduce bias, and performed a DerSimonian and Laird random effects meta-analysis. Results We included 28 studies in this review. Of these, seven studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, involving a total of 223,209 patients. Overall, females were more likely to develop cADRs to ASMs than males (OR 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-1.99). The largest differences were observed in patients prescribed lamotrigine (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.53-3.08, p < 0.001) and carbamazepine (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.02-2.60, p = 0.042). Also, the OR trended higher for phenytoin (OR 2.46, 95% CI 0.79-7.65, p = 0.12), followed by oxcarbazepine (OR 1.91, 95% CI 0.75-4.85, p = 0.18) and sodium valproate (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.12-2.99, p = 0.53), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. In the remaining 21 studies, 13 reported numerically higher risk of cADRs among females compared to male patients, and in five of these, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Our findings confirmed that females are more susceptible to cADRs induced by ASMs than males. More research is needed to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms for this difference. Protocol registration PROSPERO (CRD42018111943).
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 176
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adverse reactions of Niaoduqing granules: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fu, Baohui
    Shang, Zongjie
    Song, Simian
    Xu, Yupei
    Wei, Lijuan
    Li, Ge
    Yang, Hongtao
    [J]. PHYTOMEDICINE, 2023, 109
  • [32] Metacognitive beliefs in individuals at risk for psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences
    Baumgartner, Josef
    Litvan, Zsuzsa
    Koch, Marlene
    Hinterbuchinger, Barbara
    Friedrich, Fabian
    Baumann, Lukas
    Mossaheb, Nilufar
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRIE, 2020, 34 (03) : 108 - 115
  • [33] Sex differences in risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rehman, Sabah
    Sahle, Berhe W.
    Chandra, Ronil, V
    Dwyer, Mitchell
    Thrift, Amanda G.
    Callisaya, Michele
    Breslin, Monique
    Phan, Hoang T.
    Otahal, Petr
    Gall, Seana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 406
  • [34] Sex Differences in Carotid Atherosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    van Dam-Nolen, Dianne H. K.
    van Egmond, Nina C. M.
    Koudstaal, Peter J.
    van der Lugt, Aad
    Bos, Daniel
    [J]. STROKE, 2023, 54 (02) : 315 - 326
  • [35] Sex Differences in Response to Triptans A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    van Casteren, Daphne S.
    Kurth, Tobias
    Danser, A. H. Jan
    Terwindt, Gisela M.
    MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2021, 96 (04) : 162 - 170
  • [36] Sex Differences in Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Roberts, Brandon M.
    Nuckols, Greg
    Krieger, James W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (05) : 1448 - 1460
  • [37] Sex Differences in Presentation of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ali, Mariam
    van Os, Hendrikus J. A.
    van der Weerd, Nelleke
    Schoones, Jan W.
    Heymans, Martijn W.
    Kruyt, Nyika D.
    Visser, Marieke C.
    Wermer, Marieke J. H.
    [J]. STROKE, 2022, 53 (02) : 345 - 354
  • [38] Sex differences in the prevalence of rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pinart, Mariona
    Keller, Theresa
    Reich, Andreas
    Frohlich, Matthias
    Cabieses, Baltica
    Hohmann, Cynthia
    Postma, Dirkje S.
    Bousquet, Jean
    Anto, Josep M.
    Keil, Thomas
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2016, 48
  • [39] Carbamazepine cutaneous adverse reactions and HLA gene variation in the Chinese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meng, Qingli
    Gu, Hongyan
    Zhang, Qinghua
    Yi, Zhanmiao
    Jiang, Dechun
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2023, 24 (08) : 459 - 474
  • [40] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventions to Reduce Adverse Drug Reactions in Older Adults: An Update
    Gray, Shelly L.
    Perera, Subashan
    Soverns, Tim
    Hanlon, Joseph T.
    [J]. DRUGS & AGING, 2023, 40 (11) : 965 - 979