How Organizational Structure Affects Ecological Responsiveness

被引：15

作者：

Perez-Valls, Miguel ^{[1
]}

Cespedes-Lorente, Jose ^{[1
]}

Martinez-del-Rio, Javier ^{[1
]}

Antolin-Lopez, Raquel ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Almeria, Almeria, Spain

来源：

BUSINESS & SOCIETY | 2019年 / 58卷 / 08期

关键词：

aviation industry; environmental responsiveness; organizational structure; structural complexity; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PROACTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; GREEN; INNOVATION; DESIGN; COMMITMENT; IMPACT; VIEW;

D O I：

10.1177/0007650317696313

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

In this article, we analyze the relationship between the main dimensions of organizational structure (i.e., formalization, centralization, and complexity) and ecological responsiveness in a sample of 109 firms in the European air passenger transport industry. Broadly confirming our hypotheses, the results show that high formalization of routine tasks favors ecological responsiveness. Structures characterized by high decentralization and low complexity also favor ecological responsiveness. Furthermore, decentralization has a significant, positive relationship with ecological responsiveness among firms with low vertical complexity. Overall, the results indicate that organizational structure plays a major role in ecological responsiveness.

引用

页码：1634 / 1670

页数：37

共 50 条

[31] Strategy implementation and organizational change: How formal reorganization affects professional networks
Lynch, Susan E.
Mors, Marie Louise
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2019, 52 (02) : 255 - 270
[32] A Dynamic Approach to Causal Ambiguity: How Organizational Learning Affects Causal Ambiguity
Andersen, Jim
Jansson, Christian
Ljungkvist, Torbjorn
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (ICICKM 2015), 2015, : 1 - 5
[33] Who We Are Affects How We Do: The Financial Benefits of Organizational Identification
Millward, Lynne J.
Postmes, Tom
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 21 (02) : 327 - 339
[34] How political ideology affects the communication of organizational relations: A social network approach
You, Leping
Zhao, Xinyan
Xu, Sifan
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2024, 50 (02)
[35] How organizational slack affects new venture performance in China: a contingent perspective
Pang, Changwei
Shen, Hao
Li, Yuan
CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2011, 5 (02) : 181 - 193
[36] How organizational learning affects a firm's flexibility, competitive strategy, and performance
Leticia Santos-Vijande, Maria
Angel Lopez-Sanchez, Jose
Antonio Trespalacios, Juan
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2012, 65 (08) : 1079 - 1089
[37] How Bureaucratic Representation Affects Public Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Ding, Fangda
Lu, Jiahuan
Riccucci, Norma M.
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2021, 81 (06) : 1003 - 1018
[38] It takes a village: How organizational support for adoption positively affects employees and their families
Quade, Matthew J.
Hackney, Kaylee J.
Carlson, Dawn S.
Hanlon, Ryan P.
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 94 (03) : 706 - 734
[39] War for talents-How perceived organizational innovativeness affects employer attractiveness
Sommer, Luise Pauline
Heidenreich, Sven
Handrich, Matthias
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2017, 47 (02) : 299 - 310
[40] A BLESSING AND A CURSE: HOW CEOS' TRAIT EMPATHY AFFECTS THEIR MANAGEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CRISES
Koenig, Andreas
Graf-Vlachy, Lorenz
Bundy, Jonathan
Little, Laura M.
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 45 (01): : 130 - 153

← 1 2 3 4 5 →