Left Ventricular Rupture After Impella® Placement During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:1
|
作者
de Armas, Ismael A. Salas [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Sachin [1 ,2 ]
Almustafa, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Akkanti, Bindu [1 ,2 ]
Akay, M. Hakan [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Manish K. [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Jayeshkumar [1 ,2 ]
Rajagopal, Keshava [1 ,2 ]
Marcano, Juan [3 ]
Goswami, Rajiv [1 ,2 ]
Gregoric, Igor D. [1 ,2 ]
Kar, Biswajit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Adv Cardiopulm Therapies & Transplantat, 6400 Fannin,Suite 2350, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Mem Hermann Hosp, Texas Med Ctr, 6400 Fannin,Suite 2350, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Michael E DeBakey Dept Surg, Div Cardiothorac Surg, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Impella; Left ventricle; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Ventricular perforation; Ventricular rupture; Ventriculogram; HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2019.06.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Ventricular perforation is a rare complication during a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when supported by Impella (R) (Abiomed). However, instrumentation of the left ventricle several days after transmural infarct potentially increases susceptibility for perforation. While a patient is on Impella support, physicians should review ventriculograms carefully to detect perforation and should consider the presence of a decompressed ventricle, the absence of normal systolic pressure and the movement of contrast from the ventricle into the aorta bypassing the left ventricular ejection. Immediate removal of the Impella if a perforation occurs must be avoided. Retrieving the device would risk a catastrophic bleed, while alternative repair techniques are available. Here, we describe a patient with a left ventricle perforation that occurred during a high-risk PCI supported by an Impella device. Annotated summary: The repair of a left ventricle perforation during high-risk PCI in a patient who had an unrecognized left ventricular perforation is described. Physicians are encouraged to carefully review ventriculograms to identify the subtle changes that can indicate a perforation. Further, immediate removal of the temporary LVAD should be avoided to minimize the risk of catastrophic bleeds. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S100 / S102
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impella Versus Non-Impella for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Institutional Cohort Comparison
    Reddy, Pavan
    Merdler, Ilan
    Zhang, Cheng
    Cellamare, Matteo
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Rogers, Toby
    Satler, Lowell
    Waksman, Ron
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (04) : S23 - S23
  • [22] Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Alasnag, Mirvat A.
    Gardi, Delair O.
    Elder, Mahir
    Kannam, Hari
    Ali, Farhan
    Petrina, Mircea
    Kheterpal, Vipin
    Hout, Mariah S.
    Schreiber, Theodore L.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (05) : 299 - 303
  • [23] Unprotected versus protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 in patients with multivessel disease and severely reduced left ventricular function
    Becher, Tobias
    Eder, Frederik
    Baumann, Stefan
    Lossnitzer, Dirk
    Pollmann, Berit
    Behnes, Michael
    Borggrefe, Martin
    Akin, Ibrahim
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (43)
  • [24] BALLOON ASSISTED VALVULOPLASTY FOLLOWED BY IMPELLA PLACEMENT FOR HIGH-RISK PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IS FEASIBLE AND SAFE IN NONEMERGENT CASES
    Ben-Ami, Johanna
    Madhavan, Mahesh
    Flattery, Erin
    Nazif, Tamim
    Moses, Jeffrey W.
    Prasad, Megha
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 1160 - 1160
  • [25] Left ventricular unloading and concomitant total cardiac output increase by the use of percutaneous impella recover LP 2.5 assist device during high-risk coronary intervention
    Valgimigli, M
    Steendijk, P
    Sianos, G
    Onderwater, E
    Serruys, PW
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 65 (02) : 263 - 267
  • [26] Sex, Age, and Shock: Impella-Assisted High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Bimal, T.
    Fishbein, J.
    Miklin, D.
    Gandotra, P.
    Omar, W.
    Ong, L.
    Gruberg, L.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 17 (04) : S3 - S3
  • [27] High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention using the intracardiac microaxial pump 'Impella Recover'
    Ramondo, Angelo
    Napodano, Massimo
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    Calzolari, Diego
    Nalli, Chiara
    Cacciavillani, Luisa
    Iliceto, Sabino
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2006, 7 (02) : 149 - 152
  • [28] Percutaneous left ventricular assist device in high risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Kahaly, Omar
    Boudoulas, Konstantinos Dean
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (03) : 298 - 302
  • [29] Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Impella 2.5 Device The Europella Registry
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Konorza, Thomas
    Erbel, Raimund
    Danna, Paolo L.
    Viecca, Maurizio
    Minden, Hans-Heinrich
    Butter, Christian
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Hassager, Christian
    Machado, Francisco P.
    Pedrazzini, Giovanni
    Wagner, Daniel R.
    Schamberger, Rainer
    Kerber, Sebastian
    Mathey, Detlef G.
    Schofer, Joachim
    Engstrom, Annemarie E.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (25) : 2430 - 2434
  • [30] Left ventricular support with Impella for high risk percutaneous coronary intervention. The demonstration of the hemodynamic benefit in daily practice
    Antoni Gomez-Hospital, Joan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 274 : 254 - 256