Left Ventricular Rupture After Impella® Placement During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:1
|
作者
de Armas, Ismael A. Salas [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Sachin [1 ,2 ]
Almustafa, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Akkanti, Bindu [1 ,2 ]
Akay, M. Hakan [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Manish K. [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Jayeshkumar [1 ,2 ]
Rajagopal, Keshava [1 ,2 ]
Marcano, Juan [3 ]
Goswami, Rajiv [1 ,2 ]
Gregoric, Igor D. [1 ,2 ]
Kar, Biswajit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Adv Cardiopulm Therapies & Transplantat, 6400 Fannin,Suite 2350, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Mem Hermann Hosp, Texas Med Ctr, 6400 Fannin,Suite 2350, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Michael E DeBakey Dept Surg, Div Cardiothorac Surg, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Impella; Left ventricle; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Ventricular perforation; Ventricular rupture; Ventriculogram; HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2019.06.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Ventricular perforation is a rare complication during a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when supported by Impella (R) (Abiomed). However, instrumentation of the left ventricle several days after transmural infarct potentially increases susceptibility for perforation. While a patient is on Impella support, physicians should review ventriculograms carefully to detect perforation and should consider the presence of a decompressed ventricle, the absence of normal systolic pressure and the movement of contrast from the ventricle into the aorta bypassing the left ventricular ejection. Immediate removal of the Impella if a perforation occurs must be avoided. Retrieving the device would risk a catastrophic bleed, while alternative repair techniques are available. Here, we describe a patient with a left ventricle perforation that occurred during a high-risk PCI supported by an Impella device. Annotated summary: The repair of a left ventricle perforation during high-risk PCI in a patient who had an unrecognized left ventricular perforation is described. Physicians are encouraged to carefully review ventriculograms to identify the subtle changes that can indicate a perforation. Further, immediate removal of the temporary LVAD should be avoided to minimize the risk of catastrophic bleeds. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S100 / S102
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Mechanical Left Ventricular Unloading by Impella on Left Ventricular Dynamics in High-Risk and Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients
    Remmelink, Maurice
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    Vis, Marije M.
    Koch, Karel T.
    Paulus, Walter J.
    de Mol, Bas A. J. M.
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 75 (02) : 187 - 194
  • [2] The role of Impella in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Moura-Ferreira, Sara
    Ladeiras-Lopes, Ricardo
    MBala, Domingas
    Rodrigues, Alberto
    Braga, Pedro
    Gama, Vasco
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2018, 37 (07)
  • [3] Left Ventricular Assist for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Jones, Haile A.
    Kalisetti, Deepika R.
    Gaba, Mahender
    McCormick, Daniel J.
    Goldberg, Sheldon
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 24 (10): : 544 - 550
  • [4] An unexpected complication after impella use for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Roccasalva, Fausto
    Cannata, Francesco
    Chiarito, Mauro
    Pellegrino, Marta
    Pagnotta, Paolo
    Lancini, Damiano Regazzoli
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2019, 21 (0J) : J105 - J105
  • [5] Clinical Predictors of Impella Dependence During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Sanborn, Luke
    Laifman, Eric
    Huang, Christie
    Tun, Han
    Matthews, Ray
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (04) : S25 - S25
  • [6] Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Engstrom, Annemarie E.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2010, 8 (09) : 1247 - 1255
  • [7] Use of the Impella 2.5 in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    McCulloch, Brenda
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2011, 31 (01) : E1 - E16
  • [8] Impella Versus Non-Impella for Nonemergent High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Reddy, Pavan
    Merdler, Ilan
    Zhang, Cheng
    Cellamare, Matteo
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Bernardo, Nelson L.
    Hashim, Hayder D.
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Rogers, Toby
    Waksman, Ron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 225 : 4 - 9
  • [9] Impella-Assisted Complex High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Lin, Yen-Po
    Lee, Wen-Lieng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (16) : S208 - S210
  • [10] Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Remmelink, Maurice
    Baon, Jan, Jr.
    van der Schaaf, Rene J.
    Vis, Marije M.
    Koch, Karel T.
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Piek, Jan J.
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 98 (8A): : 88M - 88M