Prenatal Genetic Testing for Intersex Conditions in Canada

被引:8
|
作者
Saulnier, Katie M. [1 ]
Gallois, Hortense [1 ]
Joly, Yann [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ctr Genom & Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
intersex conditions; noninvasive prenatal testing; genetic counseing; best practices;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogc.2020.05.015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Intersex individuals face human rights violations, discrimination, and stigmatization worldwide. Diagnosis in infants is uncommon, with between 1 in 2000 and 1 in 4500 infants born with ambiguous external genitalia sufficient to warrant genetic and endocrine studies. However, estimates of the actual proportion of the population falling under the broader umbrella of intersex, including sexual variation at the chromosomal, gonadal, hormonal, or genital level, are as high as 1.7%. As the rise of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) capable of identifying intersex conditions at the fetal stage has increased the potential for prenatal detection, there is an urgent need for attention to the potential ethical challenges that may arise from earlier and more frequent detection. There has been growing attention in recent years to the harms faced by intersex individuals at the hands of the medical community. In the prenatal context, genetic counseling is one avenue by which prospective parents might be helped to understand the full spectrum of intersexuality and form realistic expectations for their children. However, best practices and medical policies to prevent stigmatization and discrimination against intersex individuals remain underdeveloped. There is presently a lack of Canadian specific guidance or explicit legal protections for intersex individuals to guide health care providers in their relationship with these patients and their families. In this commentary, we argue that this gap calls for increased training for health care providers that incorporates the voices and concerns of the intersex community.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 371
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Innovations in prenatal genetic testing beyond the fetal karyotype
    Founds, Sandra
    NURSING OUTLOOK, 2014, 62 (03) : 212 - 218
  • [42] The impact of preimplantation genetic testing on prenatal diagnostic procedures
    Gulersen, Moti
    Baum, Stephanie
    Bornstein, Eran
    Krantz, David
    Singer, Tomer
    Divon, Michael Y.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (18): : 3066 - 3069
  • [43] The impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on prenatal screening
    Gulersen, Moti
    Peyser, Alexandra
    Kim, Jiyoung
    Ferraro, Amanda
    Goldman, Randi
    Mullin, Christine
    Li, Xueying
    Krantz, David
    Bornstein, Eran
    Rochelson, Burton
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S570 - S571
  • [44] PREDICTING UNCERTAINTY IN DECISIONS TO UNDERGO PRENATAL GENETIC TESTING
    Muller, Cecile
    Cameron, Linda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2010, 17 : 108 - 108
  • [45] Nurtured Genetics: Prenatal Testing and the Anchoring of Genetic Expectancies
    Furrer, Remy
    Carmi, Shai
    Lencz, Todd
    Lazaro-Munoz, Gabriel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2023, 23 (03): : 42 - 44
  • [46] Prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic kidney disorders
    Knoers, Nine V. A. M.
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 107 (02) : 255 - 261
  • [47] The impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on prenatal screening
    Gulersen, Moti
    Peyser, Alexandra
    Kim, Jiyoung
    Ferraro, Amanda
    Goldman, Randi
    Mullin, Christine
    Li, Xueying
    Krantz, David
    Bornstein, Eran
    Rochelson, Burton
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (03) : 300 - 304
  • [48] GENETIC RISK AND EARLY VERSUS LATE PRENATAL TESTING
    HECKERLING, PS
    VERP, MS
    LANCET, 1991, 337 (8737): : 363 - 363
  • [49] Genetic prenatal testing -: The doctor's and the parents' dilemma
    Dörries, A
    ETHICS OF HUMAN GENETICS: CHALLENGES OF THE (POST) GENOMIC ERA, 2002, : 107 - 116