Prenatal Genetic Testing for Intersex Conditions in Canada

被引:8
|
作者
Saulnier, Katie M. [1 ]
Gallois, Hortense [1 ]
Joly, Yann [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ctr Genom & Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
intersex conditions; noninvasive prenatal testing; genetic counseing; best practices;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogc.2020.05.015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Intersex individuals face human rights violations, discrimination, and stigmatization worldwide. Diagnosis in infants is uncommon, with between 1 in 2000 and 1 in 4500 infants born with ambiguous external genitalia sufficient to warrant genetic and endocrine studies. However, estimates of the actual proportion of the population falling under the broader umbrella of intersex, including sexual variation at the chromosomal, gonadal, hormonal, or genital level, are as high as 1.7%. As the rise of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) capable of identifying intersex conditions at the fetal stage has increased the potential for prenatal detection, there is an urgent need for attention to the potential ethical challenges that may arise from earlier and more frequent detection. There has been growing attention in recent years to the harms faced by intersex individuals at the hands of the medical community. In the prenatal context, genetic counseling is one avenue by which prospective parents might be helped to understand the full spectrum of intersexuality and form realistic expectations for their children. However, best practices and medical policies to prevent stigmatization and discrimination against intersex individuals remain underdeveloped. There is presently a lack of Canadian specific guidance or explicit legal protections for intersex individuals to guide health care providers in their relationship with these patients and their families. In this commentary, we argue that this gap calls for increased training for health care providers that incorporates the voices and concerns of the intersex community.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 371
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prenatal genetic testing
    Ralston, C
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2001, 31 (02) : 4 - 4
  • [2] Prenatal Genetic Testing
    Dolan, Siobhan M.
    PEDIATRIC ANNALS, 2009, 38 (08): : 426 - 430
  • [3] Prenatal Genetic Testing Options
    Jelin, Angie C.
    Sagaser, Katelynn G.
    Wilkins-Haug, Louise
    PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 66 (02) : 281 - +
  • [4] Editorial: Prenatal genetic testing
    Jenkins, Morgan
    Seasley, Angela R.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Robin, Nathaniel H.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 34 (06) : 531 - 532
  • [5] Genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis
    Dallapiccola, B
    Novelli, G
    MINERVA BIOTECNOLOGICA, 2000, 12 (01) : 5 - 14
  • [6] Attitudes towards prenatal testing and termination: views of mothers of children with genetic conditions
    Ahmed, S
    Hirst, J
    Hucknall, C
    Green, J
    Cuckle, H
    Thornton, J
    Mueller, R
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 22 (03) : 230 - 231
  • [7] Prenatal Testing for Adult-Onset Conditions: the Position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors
    Hercher, Laura
    Uhlmann, Wendy R.
    Hoffman, Erin P.
    Gustafson, Shanna
    Chen, Kelly M.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2016, 25 (06) : 1139 - 1145
  • [8] Communicating risk in prenatal genetic testing
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2004, 48 (02) : 205 - 205
  • [9] Laboratory considerations for prenatal genetic testing
    Wou, Karen
    Chung, Wendy K.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 42 (05) : 307 - 313
  • [10] Industry perspectives on prenatal genetic testing
    Swanson, Amy
    Goldberg, James D.
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 42 (05) : 314 - 317