Treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in immunocompetent infants: A randomized multicenter study of miconazole gel vs. nystatin suspension

被引:21
|
作者
Hoppe, JE
Burr, R
Ebeling, H
Hirschbrunn, P
Hoepner, H
Holder, H
Holzgraefe, E
Kneppo, K
Koch, F
Lange, H
Langer, M
MangelsdorfTaxis, R
Maurer, L
Moll, E
Preuss, G
Renz, A
Rossius, H
Sandbrink, H
Schlunk, P
SchmidtRiese, U
Scholz, HP
Schoyerer, R
Steinki, J
Tjhen, KY
vandeKamp, B
Wartha, R
Zimmer, J
机构
[1] University Children's Hospital, Tübingen
关键词
candidiasis; Candida albicans; miconazole; nystatin;
D O I
10.1097/00006454-199703000-00007
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Miconazole gel has previously been shown to be an effective treatment for oropharyngeal candidiasis (thrush) in immunocompetent infants. This study compares miconazole gel with the standard therapeutic agent, nystatin suspension, with regard to efficacy, optimal duration of therapy and safety. Design. Prospective multicenter, randomized, office-based open trial. Patients. Twenty-six pediatricians enrolled 227 immunocompetent infants with signs of oropharyngeal thrush. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of miconazole as oral gel four times daily or 100000 IU of nystatin as suspension four times daily after meals. All subjects were evaluated for safety. Fifteen patients whose thrush was not confirmed by culture were excluded from further analysis. The remaining 212 subjects were entered into an intention-to-treat analysis, Another 29 patients violated the study protocol; the remaining 183 subjects were evaluated for efficacy (per protocol analysis). Results. Clinical cure by Day 5 of treatment was demonstrated in 84.7% of the 98 subjects in the miconazole group and 21.2% of the 85 subjects in the nystatin group (P < 0.0001). By Day 8, the cumulative clinical cure rates were 96.9% (miconazole) and 37.6% (nystatin), respectively (P < 0.0001). By Day 12, 99.0% of subjects in the miconazole group and 54.1% of subjects in the nystatin group were clinically cured (P < 0.0001). Premature cessation of treatment at parents' request because of lack of clinical efficacy occurred in none of the infants treated with miconazole and in 6 infants treated with nystatin (P 0.029). The oral yeast eradication rate on Day 5 was 54.1% with miconazole and 8.2% with nystatin (P < 0.0001). Clinical relapses of oropharyngeal thrush and side effects of the study drugs were observed with similar frequency in both study arms. Conclusions. Miconazole gel was significantly superior to nystatin suspension with regard to efficacy, rapidity of achieving cure and oropharyngeal yeast eradication. Relapses and side effects did not occur more frequently with miconazole than with nystatin. The results of this study indicate that miconazole gel is superior to nystatin suspension as the treatment for oropharyngeal candidiasis in immunocompetent infants.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 293
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Angled-tip vs. straight-tip guidewire in ERCP: a randomized, multicenter study
    Hausmann, Johanes
    Lefa, Foteini
    Filmann, Natalie
    Eickhoff, Axel
    Zeuzem, Stefan
    Herrmann, Eva
    Tantau, Marcel
    Albert, Joerg
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 58 (05) : 565 - 571
  • [32] Alfapump® system vs. large volume paracentesis for refractory ascites: A multicenter randomized controlled study
    Bureau, Christophe
    Adebayo, Danielle
    de Rieu, Mael Chalret
    Elkrief, Laure
    Valla, Dominique
    Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus
    McCune, Anne
    Vargas, Victor
    Simon-Talero, Macarena
    Cordoba, Juan
    Angeli, Paolo
    Rosi, Silvia
    MacDonald, Stewart
    Malago, Massimo
    Stepanova, Maria
    Younossi, Zobair M.
    Trepte, Claudia
    Watson, Randall
    Borisenko, Oleg
    Sun, Sun
    Inhaber, Neil
    Jalan, Rajiv
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 67 (05) : 940 - 949
  • [33] Multicenter, randomized, comparative study of recombinant vs. natural streptokinases in acute myocardial infarct (TERIMA)
    Espinosa, CM
    Gálvez, IP
    Rojas, LL
    de la Vega, AR
    Alancart, JRM
    Saab, PY
    Chukram, AT
    Iribar, WT
    Concepción, R
    Paradela, SS
    Santos, GO
    Rojas, RL
    Vanasco, J
    Arroyo, RG
    Maggioni, AP
    Latini, R
    López, MAP
    Miragaya, MAM
    Saura, PL
    Estrada, MP
    Muñoz, E
    Silva, CV
    Texido, CS
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1999, 82 (06) : 1605 - 1609
  • [34] Metronidazole 0.75% gel vs. ketoconazole 2% cream in the treatment of facial seborrheic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind study
    Seckin, D.
    Gurbuz, O.
    Akin, O.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2007, 21 (03) : 345 - 350
  • [35] Comparison of Hypoallergenic Diet vs. Ranitidine in Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease of Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Famouri, Fatemeh
    Zibanejad, Nazanin
    Kabiri, Payam
    Kelishadi, Roya
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2017, 27 (04)
  • [36] Electroconvulsive therapy vs. paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression - a randomized study
    Folkerts, HW
    Michael, M
    Tolle, R
    Schonauer, K
    Mucke, S
    SchulzeMonking, H
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 96 (05) : 334 - 342
  • [37] Systemic PUVA vs. narrowband UVB in the treatment of vitiligo: a randomized controlled study
    Sapam, Ranjeeta
    Agrawal, Sudha
    Dhali, Tapan K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 51 (09) : 1107 - 1115
  • [38] Ureteroscopy vs. conservative treatment of distal ureteral calculi: Results of a randomized study
    Nigro, F.
    Benedetto, G.
    Ferrarese, P.
    Abatangelo, G.
    Scremin, E.
    Bratti, E.
    Tasca, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 270 - 270
  • [39] Frovatriptan vs. Zolmitriptan in the acute treatment of menstrually-related migraine: analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, comparative study
    Allais, G.
    Tullo, V.
    Ferrari, M. D.
    Benedetto, C.
    Zava, D.
    Bussone, G.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2011, 31 (01) : 124 - 124
  • [40] Prospective randomized multicenter study to evaluate holmium vs. new thulium fiber laser for prostate enucleation
    Romero Otero, Javier
    Justo Quintas, Juan
    Garcia Gomez, Borja
    Manfredi, Celeste
    Sopena Sutil, Raquel
    Pena Vallejo, Elena
    Lista Mateos, Fernando
    Bozzini, Giorgio
    Rodriguez Antolin, Alfredo
    Garcia Rojo, Esther
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 76 (04): : 491 - 498