Biomarker Assay Validation by Mass Spectrometry

被引:8
|
作者
Fernandez-Metzler, Carmen [1 ]
Ackermann, Brad [2 ]
Garofolo, Fabio [3 ]
Arnold, Mark E. [4 ]
DeSilva, Binodh [5 ]
Gu, Huidong [5 ]
Laterza, Omar [6 ]
Mao, Yan [7 ]
Rose, Mark [8 ]
Vazvaei-Smith, Faye [9 ]
Steenwyk, Rick [10 ]
机构
[1] PharmaCadence Analyt Serv LLC, 1440 Ind Rd, Hatfield, PA 19440 USA
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[3] BRI Frontage Co, 8898 Heather St, Vancouver, BC V6P 3S8, Canada
[4] Labcorp Drug Dev, 221 Tulip Tree Dr, Westampton, NJ 08060 USA
[5] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Route 206 & Prov Line Rd, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[6] Merck & Co Inc, 90 E Scott Ave, Rahway, NJ 07065 USA
[7] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceut, 900 Ridgebury Rd, Ridgefield, CT 06877 USA
[8] Gossamer Bio Inc, 3013 Sci Pk Rd,Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[9] Merck & Co Inc, 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, PA 19486 USA
[10] Pfizer Retired, 8739 N Homestead Circle, Irons, MI 49644 USA
来源
AAPS JOURNAL | 2022年 / 24卷 / 03期
关键词
assay validation; biomarkers; context of use; fit-for-purpose; LC-MS; MS; regulated bioanalysis; BIOANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION; 2016 WHITE PAPER; ABSOLUTE PROTEIN QUANTIFICATION; LIGAND-BINDING ASSAYS; RECENT ISSUES; INTERNAL STANDARDS; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; PART; 3-LBA; RECOMMENDATIONS; IMMUNOGENICITY;
D O I
10.1208/s12248-022-00707-z
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Decades of discussion and publication have gone into the guidance from the scientific community and the regulatory agencies on the use and validation of pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assays by chromatographic and ligand binding assays for the measurement of drugs and metabolites. These assay validations are well described in the FDA Guidance on Bioanalytical Methods Validation (BMV, 2018). While the BMV included biomarker assay validation, the focus was on understanding the challenges posed in validating biomarker assays and the importance of having reliable biomarker assays when used for regulatory submissions, rather than definition of the appropriate experiments to be performed. Different from PK bioanalysis, analysis of biomarkers can be challenging due to the presence of target analyte(s) in the control matrices used for calibrator and quality control sample preparation, and greater difficulty in procuring appropriate reference standards representative of the endogenous molecule. Several papers have been published offering recommendations for biomarker assay validation. The situational nature of biomarker applications necessitates fit-for-purpose (FFP) assay validation. A unifying theme for FFP analysis is that method validation requirements be consistent with the proposed context of use (COU) for any given biomarker. This communication provides specific recommendations for biomarker assay validation (BAV) by LC-MS, for both small and large molecule biomarkers. The consensus recommendations include creation of a validation plan that contains definition of the COU of the assay, use of the PK assay validation elements that support the COU, and definition of assay validation elements adapted to fit biomarker assays and the acceptance criteria for both.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and validation of a mass spectrometry binding assay for mGlu5 receptor
    Maria Ricart-Ortega
    Alice E. Berizzi
    Juanlo Catena
    Fanny Malhaire
    Lourdes Muñoz
    Carmen Serra
    Guillaume Lebon
    Cyril Goudet
    Amadeu Llebaria
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2020, 412 : 5525 - 5535
  • [22] Development and Validation of a Liquid ChromatographyTandem Mass Spectrometry Assay to Quantify Plasma Busulfan
    French, Deborah
    Sujishi, Kirk K.
    Long-Boyle, Janel R.
    Ritchie, James C.
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2014, 36 (02) : 169 - 174
  • [23] Development and validation of a mass spectrometry binding assay for mGlu5 receptor
    Ricart-Ortega, Maria
    Berizzi, Alice E.
    Catena, Juanlo
    Malhaire, Fanny
    Munoz, Lourdes
    Serra, Carmen
    Lebon, Guillaume
    Goudet, Cyril
    Llebaria, Amadeu
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 412 (22) : 5525 - 5535
  • [24] Label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics for biomarker discovery and validation
    Pham, Thang V.
    Piersma, Sander R.
    Oudgenoeg, Gideon
    Jimenez, Connie R.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2012, 12 (04) : 343 - 359
  • [25] Mass spectrometry: A platform for biomarker discovery and validation for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases
    Cilento, Eugene M.
    Jin, Lorrain
    Stewart, Tessandra
    Shi, Min
    Sheng, Lifu
    Zhang, Jing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 2019, 151 (04) : 397 - 416
  • [26] Assessing Targeted Mass Spectrometry Assay Performance for Putative Biomarker Proteins on a New Hybrid Nominal Mass Instrument
    Plubell, D. L.
    Phipps, W.
    Emmanuel, A.
    Merrihew, G.
    Heil, L. R.
    Remes, P. M.
    Jacob, C. C.
    Martins, C. P.
    Peterman, S. M.
    Hoofnagle, A. N.
    MacCoss, M. J.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 70
  • [27] Glioma Biomarker Discovery by Mass Spectrometry
    Dekker, Lennard
    Kheirollahi, Majid
    Stockhammer, Gunther
    Luider, Theo
    Smitt, Peter Sillevis
    NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78
  • [28] Development and validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for the measurement of faecal metronidazole
    Jeffery, Jinny
    Vincent, Zoe J.
    Ayling, Ruth M.
    Lewis, Stephen J.
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2017, 50 (06) : 323 - 330
  • [29] Mass spectrometry for glycan biomarker discovery
    Aizpurua-Olaizola, O.
    Sastre Torano, J.
    Falcon-Perez, J. M.
    Williams, C.
    Reichardt, N.
    Boons, G. -J.
    TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 100 : 7 - 14
  • [30] Bioanalytical method validation of quantitative mass spectrometry based assay: experimental protocols and regulations
    D'Avolio, Antonio
    Cantu, Marco
    Gervasoni, Jacopo
    Artusi, Carlo
    Marinova, Mariela
    Nonnato, Antonello
    Cangemi, Giuliana
    Persichilli, Silvia
    BIOCHIMICA CLINICA, 2018, 42 (01) : 51 - 61