Measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions: a scoping review protocol

被引:6
|
作者
Kim, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Weatherly, Christopher [3 ]
Wolk, Courtney Benjamin [4 ]
Proctor, Enola K. [3 ]
机构
[1] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, HSR&D Ctr Healthcare Org & Implementat Res, Boston, MA 02130 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Washington Univ, George Warren Brown Sch Social Work, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Perelman Sch Med, Ctr Mental Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 07期
关键词
MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE; DISCHARGE; INTERVENTIONS; SUPPORT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030696
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Care transition for patients being discharged from inpatient mental healthcare to outpatient settings is a growing focus for healthcare delivery systems. Many studies of this inpatient to outpatient transition use the rate of postdischarge readmissions as a patient-level outcome measure to assess the quality of transition. However, it is unclear how studies define the measure, and whether there is a shared understanding by the field regarding which definition is appropriate for which circumstances. This scoping review thus aims to examine how published studies have approached measuring unnecessary psychiatric readmissions. Methods and analysis The scoping review will be structured according to Levac et als enhancement to Arksey and OMalleys framework for conducting scoping reviews. The protocol is registered through the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/5nxuc/). We will search literature databases for studies that (1) are about care transition processes associated with unnecessary psychiatric readmissions and (2) specify use of at least one readmission time interval (ie, time period since previous discharge from inpatient care, within which a hospitalisation can be considered a readmission). Screening and review of articles will be carried out by two reviewers, first independently then involving a third reviewer as needed for consensus. We will assess review findings through both tabular and thematic analyses, noting prevalent trends in study characteristics and emergent themes across our reviewed studies. Ethics and dissemination This work comes at a time of heightened interest by many mental healthcare systems in high-quality practices that structure their care processes towards effective inpatient to outpatient transitions. Findings will support the systems careful examination of alternative potential transitional interventions, helping to ensure that their often limited quality enhancement resources are put to optimal use. We will focus on disseminating our findings to the healthcare community through strong communication infrastructures and connections with health system stakeholders that our multidisciplinary study consultants will foster throughout this study.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic reviews on platelet transfusions: Is there unnecessary duplication of effort? A scoping review
    Avau, Bert
    Dorien, O.
    Veys, Koen
    Georgsen, Jorgen
    Nahirniak, Susan
    Shehata, Nadine
    Stanworth, Simon J.
    Van Remoortel, Hans
    De Buck, Emmy
    Compernolle, Veerle
    Vandekerckhove, Philippe
    [J]. VOX SANGUINIS, 2023, 118 (01) : 16 - 23
  • [42] Reducing unnecessary caesarean sections: scoping review of financial and regulatory interventions
    Opiyo, Newton
    Young, Claire
    Requejo, Jennifer Harris
    Erdman, Joanna
    Bales, Sarah
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [43] Psychiatric readmissions and their association with physical comorbidity: a systematic literature review
    Lilijana Šprah
    Mojca Zvezdana Dernovšek
    Kristian Wahlbeck
    Peija Haaramo
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 17
  • [44] Psychiatric readmissions and their association with physical comorbidity: a systematic literature review
    Sprah, Lilijana
    Dernovsek, Mojca Zvezdana
    Wahlbeck, Kristian
    Haaramo, Peija
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 17
  • [45] Readmissions following hospitalisations for cardiovascular disease: a scoping review of the Australian literature
    Labrosciano, Clementine
    Air, Tracy
    Tavella, Rosanna
    Beltrame, John F.
    Ranasinghe, Isuru
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2020, 44 (01) : 93 - 103
  • [46] Application of machine learning in predicting hospital readmissions: a scoping review of the literature
    Huang, Yinan
    Talwar, Ashna
    Chatterjee, Satabdi
    Aparasu, Rajender R.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [47] Application of machine learning in predicting hospital readmissions: a scoping review of the literature
    Yinan Huang
    Ashna Talwar
    Satabdi Chatterjee
    Rajender R. Aparasu
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21
  • [48] Interventions to standardise hospital care at presentation, admission or discharge or to reduce unnecessary admissions or readmissions for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a scoping review
    MacDonell, Rachel
    Woods, Orla
    Whelan, Stephanie
    Cushen, Breda
    Carroll, Aine
    Brennan, John
    Kelly, Emer
    Bolger, Kenneth
    McNamara, Nora
    Lanigan, Anne
    McDonnell, Timothy
    Prihodova, Lucia
    [J]. BMJ OPEN RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [49] Conceptualisation and measurement of adaptation within the Roy adaptation model in chronic care: a scoping review protocol
    Wang, Xiyi
    Zhang, Qi
    Shao, Jing
    Ye, Zhihong
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [50] Quality of life and symptom experience measurement tools in adults with atrial fibrillation: a scoping review protocol
    Risom, Signe S.
    Norgaard, Marianne W.
    Streur, Megan M.
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (05) : 1376 - 1384