Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) for Achalasia

被引:51
|
作者
Awaiz, Aiman [1 ]
Yunus, Rossita M. [2 ]
Khan, Shahjahan [3 ]
Memon, Breda [4 ]
Memon, Muhammed A. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Jinnah Sindh Med Univ, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] Univ Malaya, Inst Math Sci, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[3] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Agr Comp & Environm Sci, Int Ctr Appl Climate Sci, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Mayne Med Sch, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] South East Queensland Surg, Sunnybank, Qld, Australia
[6] Sunnybank Obes Ctr, Sunnybank, Qld, Australia
[7] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[8] Bolton Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Bolton, Lancs, England
关键词
achalasia; esophageal dysmotility; laparoscopic methods; Heller myotomy; endoscopic methods; peroral endoscopic myotomy; comparative trials; human; English; ESOPHAGEAL MYOTOMY; PNEUMATIC DILATATION; DISTENSIBILITY; BIAS; HETEROGENEITY; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0000000000000402
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims and Objectives:Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) is the preferred surgical method for treating achalasia. However, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is providing good short-term results. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy of LHM and POEM.Materials and Methods:A search of PubMed, Cochrane database, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, and current contents for English-language articles comparing LHM and POEM between 2007 and 2016 was performed. Variables analyzed included prior endoscopic treatment, prior medical treatment, prior Heller myotomy, operative time, overall complications rate, postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score, and long-term GERD.Results:Seven trials consisting of 483 (LHM=250, POEM=233) patients were analyzed. Preoperative variables, for example, prior endoscopic treatment [odds ratio (OR), 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23-4.61; P=0.96], prior medical treatment [weighted mean difference (WMD), 1.22; 95% CI, 0.52-2.88; P=0.65], and prior Heller myotomy (WMD, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.13-1.67; P=0.25) were comparable. Operative time was 26.28 minutes, nonsignificantly longer for LHM (WMD, 26.28; 95% CI, -11.20 to 63.70; P=0.17). There was a comparable overall complication rate (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.56-2.77; P=0.59), postoperative GERD rate (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.70-2.30; P=0.44), length of hospital stay (WMD, 0.30; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.85; P=0.28), postoperative pain score (WMD, -0.26; 95% CI, -1.58 to 1.06; P=0.70), and long-term GERD (WMD, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.27-4.1; P=0.08) for both procedures. There was a significantly higher short-term clinical treatment failure rate for LHM (OR, 9.82; 95% CI, 2.06-46.80; P<0.01).Conclusions:POEM compares favorably to LHM for achalasia treatment in short-term perioperative outcomes. However, there was a significantly higher clinical treatment failure rate for LHM on short-term postoperative follow-up. Presently long-term postoperative follow-up data for POEM beyond 1 year are unavailable and eagerly awaited.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 131
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Treatment of Achalasia Laparoscopic Heller-Myotomy or peroral endoscopic Myotomy?
    Schroeder, W.
    Bruns, C. J.
    CHIRURG, 2018, 89 (06): : 482 - 482
  • [32] Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of Type III achalasia in 75 patients: a multicenter comparative study
    Kumbhari, Vivek
    Tieu, Alan H.
    Onimaru, Manabu
    El Zein, Mohammad H.
    Teitelbaum, Ezra N.
    Ujiki, Michael B.
    Gitelis, Matthew E.
    Modayil, Rani J.
    Hungness, Eric S.
    Stavropoulos, Stavros N.
    Shiwaku, Hiro
    Kunda, Rastislav
    Chiu, Philip
    Saxena, Payal
    Messallam, Ahmed A.
    Inoue, Haruhiro
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (03) : E195 - E201
  • [33] IS PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM) FEASIBLE IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH ACHALASIA? A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Moole, Harsha V.
    Waqar, Ayesha
    Baldoni, Anthony
    Dharmapuri, Sowmya
    Nguyen, Vu
    Moole, Vishnu
    Poosala, Anwesh
    Boddireddy, Raghuveer R.
    Uppu, Achuta
    Duvvuri, Abhiram
    Emani, Vamsi
    Kapaganti, Sowjanya
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 152 (05) : S1284 - S1284
  • [34] Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) versus laparoscopic heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of type III achalasia in 75 patients: an international multicenter experience
    Kumbhari, V.
    Saxena, P.
    Tieu, A. H.
    Onimaru, M.
    El Zein, M.
    Modayil, R. J.
    Teitelbaum, E. N.
    Messallem, A. A.
    Gitelis, M. E.
    Stavropoulos, S. N.
    Hungness, E. S.
    Ujiki, M. B.
    Shiwaku, H.
    Chiu, P. W.
    Inoue, H.
    Khashab, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 65 - 66
  • [35] Factors associated with peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shou, Yajun
    Wang, Xiandi
    Liu, Deliang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (07): : 3503 - 3519
  • [36] PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY VERSUS SURGICAL MYOTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACHALASIA: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Martins, Rafael K.
    Bernardo, Wanderlei M.
    Moura, Eduardo T.
    Coutinho, Lara M.
    Farias, Galileu F.
    Madruga Neto, Antonio C.
    Delgado, Aureo
    Ribeiro, Igor B.
    Sakai, Paulo
    Sallum, Rubens A.
    de Moura, Eduardo G.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB538 - AB539
  • [37] Clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhong, Chunyu
    Tan, Shali
    Huang, Shu
    Peng, Yan
    Lu, Muhan
    Tang, Xiaowei
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2021, 34 (04)
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of recurrent achalasia after failed Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kamal, Faisal
    Ismail, Mohammad K.
    Khan, Muhammad A.
    Lee-Smith, Wade
    Sharaiha, Reem Z.
    Sharma, Sachit
    McDonough, Stephanie
    Tariq, Raseen
    Marella, Hemnishil K.
    Khan, Zubair
    Heda, Rajiv P.
    Tombazzi, Claudio
    Howden, Colin W.
    Adler, Douglas G.
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 34 (02): : 155 - +
  • [39] IS PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM) SAFER THAN SURGICAL MYOTOMY IN TREATING ADULT PATIENTS WITH ACHALASIA? A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Moole, Harsha V.
    Baldoni, Anthony
    Kapaganti, Sowjanya
    Vu Nguyen
    Waqar, Ayesha
    Moole, Vishnu
    Poosala, Anwesh
    Boddireddy, Raghuveer R.
    Uppu, Achuta
    Duvvuri, Abhiram
    Emani, Vamsi
    Dharmapuri, Sowmya
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 152 (05) : S339 - S339
  • [40] A Decade of Investigation: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy for Achalasia
    Olson, Michael T.
    Triantafyllou, Tania
    Singhal, Saurabh
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (09): : 1093 - 1104