Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) for Achalasia

被引:51
|
作者
Awaiz, Aiman [1 ]
Yunus, Rossita M. [2 ]
Khan, Shahjahan [3 ]
Memon, Breda [4 ]
Memon, Muhammed A. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Jinnah Sindh Med Univ, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] Univ Malaya, Inst Math Sci, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[3] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Agr Comp & Environm Sci, Int Ctr Appl Climate Sci, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Mayne Med Sch, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] South East Queensland Surg, Sunnybank, Qld, Australia
[6] Sunnybank Obes Ctr, Sunnybank, Qld, Australia
[7] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[8] Bolton Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Bolton, Lancs, England
关键词
achalasia; esophageal dysmotility; laparoscopic methods; Heller myotomy; endoscopic methods; peroral endoscopic myotomy; comparative trials; human; English; ESOPHAGEAL MYOTOMY; PNEUMATIC DILATATION; DISTENSIBILITY; BIAS; HETEROGENEITY; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0000000000000402
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims and Objectives:Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) is the preferred surgical method for treating achalasia. However, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is providing good short-term results. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy of LHM and POEM.Materials and Methods:A search of PubMed, Cochrane database, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, and current contents for English-language articles comparing LHM and POEM between 2007 and 2016 was performed. Variables analyzed included prior endoscopic treatment, prior medical treatment, prior Heller myotomy, operative time, overall complications rate, postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score, and long-term GERD.Results:Seven trials consisting of 483 (LHM=250, POEM=233) patients were analyzed. Preoperative variables, for example, prior endoscopic treatment [odds ratio (OR), 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23-4.61; P=0.96], prior medical treatment [weighted mean difference (WMD), 1.22; 95% CI, 0.52-2.88; P=0.65], and prior Heller myotomy (WMD, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.13-1.67; P=0.25) were comparable. Operative time was 26.28 minutes, nonsignificantly longer for LHM (WMD, 26.28; 95% CI, -11.20 to 63.70; P=0.17). There was a comparable overall complication rate (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.56-2.77; P=0.59), postoperative GERD rate (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.70-2.30; P=0.44), length of hospital stay (WMD, 0.30; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.85; P=0.28), postoperative pain score (WMD, -0.26; 95% CI, -1.58 to 1.06; P=0.70), and long-term GERD (WMD, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.27-4.1; P=0.08) for both procedures. There was a significantly higher short-term clinical treatment failure rate for LHM (OR, 9.82; 95% CI, 2.06-46.80; P<0.01).Conclusions:POEM compares favorably to LHM for achalasia treatment in short-term perioperative outcomes. However, there was a significantly higher clinical treatment failure rate for LHM on short-term postoperative follow-up. Presently long-term postoperative follow-up data for POEM beyond 1 year are unavailable and eagerly awaited.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 131
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM) VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC HELLER MYOTOMY (LHM) FOR ESOPHAGEAL ACHALASIA - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Ghazaleh, Sami
    Beran, Azizullah
    Patel, Dipen
    Malik, Sehrish
    Burlen, Jordan
    Alastal, Yaseen
    Nawras, Ali
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) : AB311 - AB312
  • [2] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Peroral Esophageal Myotomy (POEM) vs Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy (LHM) for Achalasia
    Awaiz, Aiman
    Yunus, Rossita
    Khan, Shahjahan
    Memon, Breda
    Memon, Muhammad
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S235 - S236
  • [3] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM) AND LAPROSCOPIC HELLER MYOTOMY (LHM) FOR ACHALASIA
    Ravikumar, Naveen Prasad Gopalakrishnan
    Wijewardena, Chathura
    Kailasam, Karthik
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S745 - S745
  • [4] Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Versus Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Schlottmann, Francisco
    Luckett, Daniel J.
    Fine, Jason
    Shaheen, Nicholas J.
    Patti, Marco G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 267 (03) : 451 - 460
  • [5] Outcome of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Treating Achalasia Compared With Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM)
    Peng, Lijun
    Tian, Shuni
    Du, Chao
    Yuan, Ziying
    Guo, Mingxiao
    Lu, Lin
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (01): : 60 - 64
  • [6] Reply to: is peroral endoscopic myotomy ( POEM) ready to replace laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) for achalasia?-comments on recent systematic review
    Memon, Muhammed Ashraf
    Memon, Breda
    [J]. ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2018, 3
  • [7] Achalasia: laparoscopic Heller myotomy with fundoplication versus peroral endoscopic myotomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sobral, Joana
    Machado, Miguel
    Barbosa, Jose Pedro
    Barbosa, Jose
    [J]. ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 21 (03) : 298 - 305
  • [8] Peroral endoscopic myotomy (poem) is cost effective when compared to laparoscopic heller myotomy (lhm) for the treatment of achalasia
    Kumbhari, V.
    Saxena, P.
    El Zein, M. H.
    Solanki, M.
    Kalloo, A. N.
    Clarke, J. O.
    Khashab, M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 143 - 143
  • [9] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LAPAROSCOPIC HELLER MYOTOMY VS. PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY FOR ACHALASIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Rozenshteyn, Frederick
    Nagirimadugu, Ankita
    Valentin, Nelson
    Kozicky, Orysia
    Siegel, Jerome H.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB198 - AB198
  • [10] Peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia with previous Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Zhenzi
    Cui, Yi
    Li, Yuanqi
    Chen, Minhu
    Xing, Xiangbin
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 47 - +