Participation in lung cancer screening

被引:19
|
作者
Baldwin, David R. [1 ,2 ]
Brain, Kate [3 ]
Quaife, Samantha [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Div Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Nottingham, England
[2] Nottingham Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Nottingham, England
[3] Cardiff Univ, Div Populat Med, Heath Pk, Cardiff, Wales
[4] UCL, Inst Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, London, England
关键词
Lung cancer screening; informed choice; participation; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SMOKING-CESSATION SERVICES; BASE-LINE CHARACTERISTICS; DOSE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BREAST-CANCER; INEQUALITIES; MORTALITY; ATTITUDES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.21037/tlcr-20-917
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although there is now strong evidence for the efficacy of low-radiation dose computed tomography in reducing lung cancer mortality, the challenge is to establish screening programmes that have the maximum impact on the disease. In screening programmes, participation rates are a major determinant of the success of the programme. Informed uptake, participation, and adherence (to successive screening rounds) determine the overall impact of the intervention by ensuring the maximum number of people at risk of the disease are screened regularly and therefore have the most chance of benefiting. Existing cancer screening programmes have taught us a great deal about methods that improve participation. Although evidence is emerging for the efficacy of some of those methods in lung cancer screening, there is still much work to do in the specific demographic that is most at risk of lung cancer. This demographic, characterised by higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation, may be less willing to engage with healthcare interventions and present a particular challenge in the process of ensuring informed choice. In this article we review the evidence for improving participation and describe the challenges that need to be addressed to ensure the successful implementation of CT screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1098
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A narrative review of lung cancer screening: risks of lung cancer screening
    Triphuridet, Natthaya
    Yankelevitz, David F.
    Wolf, Andrea
    [J]. CURRENT CHALLENGES IN THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 5
  • [22] LUNG CANCER SCREENING PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY-BASED HEALTH SYSTEMS FROM THE PROSPR-LUNG CONSORTIUM
    Burnett-Hartman, Andrea
    Carroll, Nikki
    Croswell, Jennifer
    Greenlee, Robert
    Honda, Stacey
    Neslund-Dudas, Christine
    Rendle, Katharine
    Vachani, Anil
    Ritzwoller, Debra
    [J]. CHEST, 2021, 160 (04) : 1490A - 1491A
  • [23] Satisfaction with breast cancer screening and future screening participation
    Stojadinovic, Alexander
    Henry, Leonard R.
    Peoples, George E.
    Mittendorf, Elizabeth A.
    Lenington, Sarah
    Nissan, Avirarn
    Shriver, Craig D.
    [J]. MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2007, 13 (10): : CR422 - CR429
  • [24] Lung cancer screening
    McWilliams, A
    Lam, S
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2005, 11 (04) : 272 - 277
  • [25] Lung Cancer Screening
    Deffebach, Mark E.
    Humphrey, Linda
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 95 (05) : 967 - +
  • [26] LUNG CANCER SCREENING
    Fjellbirkeland, Lars
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2018, 138 (15) : 1470 - 1470
  • [27] Screening for Lung Cancer
    Houston, Thomas
    [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 104 (06) : 1037 - +
  • [28] Lung cancer screening
    David Botero-Bahamon, Juan
    Canas-Arboleda, Alejandra
    Oliveros-Metrio, Paulina
    [J]. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CANCEROLOGIA, 2023, 27 (01): : 126 - 139
  • [29] Lung cancer screening
    Mazzone P.J.
    Mekhail T.
    [J]. Current Oncology Reports, 2007, 9 (4) : 265 - 274
  • [30] Lung Cancer Screening
    Tanoue, Lynn T.
    Tanner, Nichole T.
    Gould, Michael K.
    Silvestri, Gerard A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191 (01) : 19 - 33