Efficacy and Safety of Postoperative Pain Relief by Parecoxib Injection after Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:14
|
作者
Huang, Jun-ming [1 ]
Lv, Zheng-tao [1 ]
Zhang, Ya-nan [2 ]
Jiang, Wen-xiu [3 ]
Li, Han-ning [4 ]
Nie, Ming-bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Orthoped, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Cardiol, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Eye Ear Nose & Throat Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Thyroid Breast Surg, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
parecoxib; postoperative pain; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; gynecological laparoscopic surgery; LENGTH-OF-STAY; SHOULDER PAIN; INTRAVENOUS PARECOXIB; PREEMPTIVE ANALGESIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; CLINICAL-TRIAL; SODIUM; INTRAPERITONEAL; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; INHIBITOR;
D O I
10.1111/papr.12649
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of parecoxib injection in pain relief after laparoscopic surgeries. MethodsA comprehensive literature search based on 4 online databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science) was applied to retrieve all related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two independent reviewers screened each article for eligibility according to the predetermined inclusion criteria. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was applied to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. A standardized data collection sheet was designed to extract data from included studies. RevMan version 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) was selected to perform meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 1,060 participants who were scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) were enrolled in 12 selected RCTs. The methodological qualities of the studies were evaluated as moderate to high. The combined data showed that perioperative parecoxib injection could significantly reduce the proportion of patients who required adjuvant pain relieve after laparoscopic surgeries. Significantly lower pain scores in the parecoxib groups were observed, which proved that preoperative or intraoperative injection of 40 mg parecoxib was more effective than placebo for immediate pain relief after LC. But preoperative injection of 40 mg parecoxib showed no improvement compared with placebo in the management of immediate pain following gynecological laparoscopic surgery. The occurrence of adverse events showed no differences between perioperative parecoxib administration and placebo control. ConclusionPerioperative parecoxib administration was effective in reducing the proportion of patients who required adjuvant pain relief after laparoscopic surgeries without significant adverse events compared with placebo. The effect of parecoxib injection on immediate pain relief remains in question. Future RCTs with larger sample sizes are encouraged.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 610
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is preemptive analgesia a good choice for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgeries? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Lu-kai
    Li, Qiang
    Quan, Ren-Fu
    Liu, Jun-Sheng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (13) : E25319
  • [22] Comparison of bupivacaine and parecoxib for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    Lin, Shengping
    Hua, Jie
    Xu, Bin
    Yang, Tingsong
    He, Zhigang
    Xu, Chenglei
    Meng, Hongbo
    Zhou, Bo
    Song, Zhenshun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (08): : 13824 - 13829
  • [23] The Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib for Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Geng, Xiaoyuan
    Zhou, Shangyou
    Zhang, Xiaoyan
    Liu, Xi
    Cheng, Xu
    Jiang, Lihua
    Zhang, Donghang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of Danhong injection for treating myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yang, Shiyi
    Wang, Yin
    Shen, Hailiang
    Chen, Tianhang
    Du, Haixia
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [26] Peer review report 2 on "Efficiency and safety of ketamine for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials"
    Sajid, Muhammad Shafique
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 49 : 46 - 46
  • [27] Safety and efficacy of perampanel in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lavu, Alekhya
    Aboulatta, Laila Nabil Mahmoud Helmy
    Abou-Setta, Ahamed M.
    Aloud, Basma
    Askin, Nicole
    Rabbani, Rasheda
    Shouman, Walid
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Eltonsy, Sherif
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 329 - 330
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of moxibustion for chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Feng-qin
    Ge, Jian-feng
    Leng, Yu-fei
    Li, Cheng
    Chen, Bin
    Sun, Zhi-ling
    [J]. COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 39
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Guedeney, Paul
    Giustino, Gennaro
    Sorrentino, Sabato
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Camaj, Anton
    Kalkman, Deborah N.
    Vogel, Birgit
    Sartori, Samantha
    De Rosa, Salvatore
    Baber, Usman
    Indolfi, Ciro
    Montalescot, Gilles
    Dangas, George D.
    Rosenson, Robert S.
    Pocock, Stuart J.
    Mehran, Roxana
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (07) : E17 - E25
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of kinesiology tape for hemiplegic shoulder pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Lingxin
    Zheng, Yao
    He, Chengqi
    Zhao, Yanmin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 35 (01) : 35 - 46