Good for the feelings, bad for the memory: the impact of 3D versus 2D movies on persuasion knowledge and brand placement effectiveness

被引:17
|
作者
Breves, Priska [1 ]
Schramm, Holger [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Media & Business Commun, Inst Human Comp Media, Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Media & Business Commun, Oswald Kuelpe Weg 82, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
Brand placement; persuasion knowledge; brand memory; brand evaluation; behavioral intention; 3D movies; LIMITED-CAPACITY MODEL; PRODUCT PLACEMENT; COGNITIVE LOAD; SPONSORSHIP DISCLOSURE; PROMINENCE; RESPONSES; ADVERGAMES; PERCEIVERS; RESISTANCE; INTENTION;
D O I
10.1080/02650487.2019.1622326
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Brand placements have been a popular advertising strategy for several decades, yet the effects of technological factors have been largely neglected in brand placement research. Consequently, this study analyzes the impact of a popular media technology, namely stereoscopy, on brand placement effectiveness, using the limited capacity model of mediated message processing and the persuasion knowledge model to predict and explain the effects. The main study (N = 120) confirmed that compared with 3D movies, in 2D movies the participants were more likely to remember the brands placed and to critically reflect the persuasive intentions behind the placements. The additional structural elements in stereoscopic movies appear to require more cognitive resources. The consequent lack of cognitive capacity diminishes persuasion knowledge, which, in turn, positively affects brand evaluations and behavioral intentions. A post-hoc study (N = 54) validated the assumption that media users watching 3D movies experience a higher cognitive load than those watching 2D movies.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1264 / 1285
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D
    Almeid Santos, A. T.
    Pais, A. S.
    Reis, S.
    Laranjo, M.
    Caramelo, F.
    Silva, F.
    Botelho, F.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 341 - 342
  • [22] 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumour response to treatment
    Hopper, KD
    Kasales, CJ
    Eggli, KD
    Belman, NM
    Potok, PS
    TenHave, TR
    Umlauf, MJ
    VanSlyke, MA
    Olt, GJ
    Close, P
    Lipton, A
    Harvey, HA
    Hartzell, JS
    Go, BDM
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN ONCOLOGY: 19TH L H GRAY CONFERENCE, 1996, : 50 - 51
  • [23] 2D versus 3D templating in total knee arthroplasty
    Ettinger, Max
    Claassen, Leif
    Paes, Peter
    Calliess, Tilman
    KNEE, 2016, 23 (01): : 149 - 151
  • [24] 2D versus 3D colour space face detection
    Kovac, J
    Peer, P
    Solina, F
    PROCEEDINGS EC-VIP-MC 2003, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 449 - 454
  • [25] 2D versus 3D roadmap for uterine artery catheterization: impact on several angiographic parameters
    Maleux, Geert
    Michielsen, Koen
    Timmerman, Dirk
    Poppe, Willy
    Heye, Sam
    Vaninbroukx, Johan
    Bosmans, Hilde
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (01) : 62 - 70
  • [26] Impact of brachytherapy technique (2D versus 3D) on outcome following radiotherapy of cervical cancer
    Derks, Kris
    Steenhuijsen, Jacco L. G.
    van den Berg, Hetty A.
    Houterman, Saskia
    Cnossen, Jeltsje
    van Haaren, Paul
    De Jaeger, Katrien
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 10 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [27] Sense of virtual reality: Effectiveness of replacing 3D imagery with 2D/3D hybrid imagery
    Tasaki, S
    Matsushita, T
    Koshi, K
    Wada, C
    Koga, H
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEMS, 2005, E88D (05) : 851 - 858
  • [28] The Effectiveness of 2D and 3D Methods in the Analysis of Experimental Bite Marks
    Przystanska, Agnieszka
    Lorkiewicz-Muszynska, Dorota
    Rychlik, Michal
    Glapinski, Mariusz
    Labecka, Marzena
    Swiderski, Pawel
    Zaba, Czeslaw
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2015, 52 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [29] Guided Impact Mitigation in 2D and 3D Granular Crystals
    Burgoyne, Hayden A.
    Newman, John A.
    Jackson, Wade C.
    Daraio, Chiara
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 HYPERVELOCITY IMPACT SYMPOSIUM (HVIS 2015), 2015, 103 : 52 - 59
  • [30] Impact Properties of 2D and 3D Woven Composites : A Review
    Aiman, D. P. C.
    Yahya, M. F.
    Salleh, J.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (ICASET 2015), 2016, 1774