Reliance on decision aids: An examination of auditors' assessment of management fraud

被引:0
|
作者
Eining, MM [1 ]
Jones, DR [1 ]
Loebbecke, JK [1 ]
机构
[1] GEORGIA STATE UNIV,ATLANTA,GA 30303
来源
关键词
management fraud; decision aid; expert system; decision aid reliance; red flags;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The assessment of management fraud risk is a complex decision process, but one with which few auditors have had experience. As a result, decision aids have been suggested to support this process. Unfortunately, many times users do not rely on decision aids even when doing so would improve the quality of the decision. This paper reports on an experiment that examines the use of an expert system decision aid created to enhance the engagement of the user and increase reliance on the aid. Auditors using the expert system exhibited the ability to better discriminate between situations with varying levels of management fraud risk and selected more consistent subsequent decisions regarding appropriate audit actions than did users of a decision aid that provided only a suggested assessment, a legit statistical model. The legit model users did discriminate better than both checklist users and unaided decision makers.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Representations as decision aids: The asymmetric effects of words and numbers on auditors' inherent risk judgments
    Dilla, WN
    Stone, DN
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES, 1997, 28 (03) : 709 - 743
  • [22] Stubborn Reliance on Human Nature in Employee Selection: Statistical Decision Aids Are Evolutionarily Novel
    Colarelli, Stephen M.
    Thompson, Matthew
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2008, 1 (03): : 347 - 351
  • [23] Exploring external auditors' perceptions of the motivations behind management fraud in Egypt - a mixed methods approach
    Kassem, Rasha
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2018, 33 (01) : 16 - 34
  • [24] Cost-Sensitive Decision Making for Online Fraud Management
    Yildirim, Mehmet Yigit
    Ozer, Mert
    Davulcu, Hasan
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND INNOVATIONS, AIAI 2018, 2018, 519 : 323 - 336
  • [25] Internal Auditors' Evaluation of Fraud Factors in Planning an Audit: The Importance of Audit Committee Quality and Management Incentives
    Asare, Stephen
    Davidson, Ronald
    Gramling, Audrey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2008, 12 (03) : 181 - 203
  • [26] Ethical Decision Making Among Auditors in Indonesia: Examination on State Professional Skepticism and Auditor Independence
    Kamarudin, Yanto
    Sanusi, Zuraidah Mohd
    Syed, Sharifah Nazatul Faiza
    Frensidy, Budi
    Mat-Isa, Yusarina
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING JOURNAL, 2022, 17 (02): : 279 - 315
  • [27] READABILITY ASSESSMENT OF DECISION AIDS FOR UROLOGIC DYSFUNCTIONS
    Pyun, S.
    Malik, R.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2020, 39 : S374 - S375
  • [28] The Saint Xavier University Graduate Program in Financial Fraud Examination and Management
    Kresse, William J.
    [J]. ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION, 2008, 23 (04): : 601 - 608
  • [29] Risk management computer decision aids.
    Anderson, K
    Stokes, K
    Miranda, M
    Schnitkey, G
    Selley, R
    Rister, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (05) : 1162 - 1162
  • [30] EXPERT SYSTEMS AS DECISION AIDS FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT
    MICK, S
    WALLACE, WA
    [J]. DISASTERS, 1985, 9 (02) : 98 - 101