Key Indicators for Linguistic Action Perspective in the Last Planner® System

被引:6
|
作者
Salazar, Luis A. [1 ,2 ]
Arroyo, Paz [3 ]
Alarcon, Luis F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ, Dept Construct Engn & Management, Sch Engn, Santiago 4860, Chile
[2] Univ Andres Bello, Fac Engn, Construct Engn, Santiago 2119, Chile
[3] DPR Construct, San Francisco, CA 94111 USA
关键词
linguistic action indicators; last planner system; linguistic action perspective; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.3390/su12208728
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since 2001, a link has been established between the Last Planner (R) System (LPS) and Linguistic Action Perspective (LAP). However, to date, it has not been studied in sufficient depth. This research developed a system of indicators to measure and control the management of commitments, through the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology, and thus contribute to the development of the social dimension of sustainability that is often neglected in construction management research. The main contributions of this paper are a proposal of five main activities to apply the DSR method, a checklist to analyze the engagement of meeting participants, a notebook for last planners, delve into the variations that can occur to the basic movements of LAP, and the creation of a system of indicators hence updating the Percent Plan Complete (PPC) with a reliability indicator. The main limitation of this research is that the system was only validated in two South American countries that implemented LPS. In future studies, we propose to apply case studies in weekly planning meetings in other industries worldwide and to determine the recommended values to improve communication and achieve the proper implementation of LAP with LPS and without LPS.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 29
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Key requirements of an IT tool based on last planner® system
    Cortes, M. J.
    Herrera, R. F.
    Munoz-La Rivera, F. C.
    Avila-Eca de Matos, B.
    [J]. REVISTA INGENIERIA DE CONSTRUCCION, 2020, 35 (02): : 126 - 134
  • [2] Understanding the theory behind the Last Planner System using the Language-Action Perspective: two case studies
    Viana, Daniela D.
    Formoso, Carlos T.
    Isatto, Eduardo L.
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2017, 28 (03) : 177 - 189
  • [3] Last planner system in construction
    Cwik, Katarzyna
    Roslon, Jerzy
    [J]. RSP 2017 - XXVI R-S-P SEMINAR 2017 THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 117
  • [4] Learning from breakdowns in the last planner system®
    Wilkinson, Bruce
    Lowe, Tony
    Pereira, Mauricio
    [J]. Lean Construction Journal, 2020, 2020 : 141 - 153
  • [5] Extending the last planner system® to the entire project
    Ballard, Glenn
    Vaagen, Hajnalka
    Kay, William
    Stevens, Bill
    Pereira, Mauricio
    [J]. Lean Construction Journal, 2020, 2020 : 42 - 77
  • [6] Development of Innovative Integrated Last Planner System (ILPS)
    Mughees Aslam
    Zhili Gao
    Gary Smith
    [J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 18 : 701 - 715
  • [7] Lean Construction in the UAE: Implementation of Last Planner System®
    Warid, Osama
    Hamani, Karima
    [J]. Lean Construction Journal, 2023, 2023 : 01 - 20
  • [8] Development of Innovative Integrated Last Planner System (ILPS)
    Aslam, Mughees
    Gao, Zhili
    Smith, Gary
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (6A) : 701 - 715
  • [9] Last planner system results in subcontract construction company
    Andrade, M.
    Arrieta, B.
    [J]. REVISTA DE LA CONSTRUCCION, 2011, 10 (01): : 36 - 52
  • [10] Using the villego® simulation to teach the last planner® system
    [J]. 1600, Lean Construction Institute (2014):