Credibilistic risk aversion

被引:5
|
作者
Liu, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Zhou, Jian [1 ]
Pantelous, Athanasios A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200044, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Math Sci, Liverpool L69 7ZL, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Inst Risk & Uncertainty, Liverpool L69 7ZL, Merseyside, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Risk aversion; LR fuzzy interval; Credibility theory; Credibilistic risk premium; G1; D81; G12; PROSPECT-THEORY; FUZZY; DISAPPOINTMENT; DECISION; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1080/14697688.2016.1264617
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In the probabilistic risk aversion approach, risks are presumed as random variables with known probability distributions. However, in some practical cases, for example, due to the absence of historical data, the inherent uncertain characteristic of risks or different subject judgements from the decision-makers, risks may be hard or not appropriate to be estimated with probability distributions. Therefore, the traditional probabilistic risk aversion theory is ineffective. Thus, in order to deal with these cases, we suggest measuring these kinds of risks as fuzzy variables, and accordingly to present an alternative risk aversion approach by employing credibility theory. In the present paper, first, the definition of credibilistic risk premium proposed by Georgescu and Kinnunen [Fuzzy Inf. Eng., 2013, 5, 399-416] is revised by taking the initial wealth into consideration, and then a general method to compute the credibilistic risk premium is provided. Secondly, regarding the risks represented with the commonly used LR fuzzy intervals, a simple calculation formula of the local credibilistic risk premium is put forward. Finally, in a global sense, several equivalent propositions for comparative risk aversion under the credibility measurement are provided. Illustrated examples are presented to show the applicability of the theoretical findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1145
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] More ambiguity aversion or more risk aversion?
    Zhang, Jiankang
    [J]. ECONOMIC THEORY BULLETIN, 2022, 10 (02) : 217 - 232
  • [32] GENDER DIFFERENCES IN RISK AVERSION AND AMBIGUITY AVERSION
    Borghans, Lex
    Heckman, James J.
    Golsteyn, Bart H. H.
    Meijers, Huub
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2009, 7 (2-3) : 649 - 658
  • [33] Risk Aversion, Loss Aversion, and the Demand for Insurance
    Eeckhoudt, Louis
    Fiori, Anna Maria
    Gianin, Emanuela Rosazza
    [J]. RISKS, 2018, 6 (02)
  • [34] Who wants to be informed - Less risk aversion or more risk aversion
    Gao J.
    Zhang L.
    Song F.
    [J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2011, 16 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [35] Decreasing absolute risk aversion, prudence and increased downside risk aversion
    Liu, Liqun
    Meyer, Jack
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2012, 44 (03) : 243 - 260
  • [36] Decreasing absolute risk aversion, prudence and increased downside risk aversion
    Liqun Liu
    Jack Meyer
    [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2012, 44 : 243 - 260
  • [37] Personality and Risk Aversion
    Desmoulins-Lebeault, Francois
    Gajewski, Jean-Francois
    Meunier, Luc
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2018, 38 (01): : 472 - +
  • [38] Possibilistic risk aversion
    Georgescu, Irina
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 160 (18) : 2608 - 2619
  • [39] Entrepreneurship and Risk Aversion
    Kamhon Kan
    Wei-Der Tsai
    [J]. Small Business Economics, 2006, 26 : 465 - 474
  • [40] Supermodularity and risk aversion
    Quiggin, John
    Chambers, Robert G.
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2006, 52 (01) : 1 - 14