Olfactory discrimination of structurally similar alcohols by cockroaches

被引:35
|
作者
Sakura, M
Okada, R
Mizunami, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Res Inst Elect Sci, Lab Neurocybernet, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Life Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 9808577, Japan
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
olfactory discrimination; mixture perception; operant conditioning; cockroach; insect;
D O I
10.1007/s00359-002-0366-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The capability of the cockroach Periplaneta americana to discriminate odors of structurally similar aliphatic alcohols was studied by using an operant conditioning paradigm. Cockroaches were trained to discriminate three odors: one odor associated with sucrose solution (reward) and two odors associated with NaCl solution (non-reward). After training, their odor preferences were tested by counting the number of visits to each odor source. We tested the capability of cockroaches to discriminate (1) three normal aliphatic alcohols with different numbers of carbon (1-pentanol, 1-hexanol and 1-octanol), (2) three C6 aliphatic alcohols (1-hexanol, 2-hexanol and trans-2-hexen-1-ol), (3) binary mixtures of two of these three alcohols and their components, and (4) 1-hexanol solution of three different concentrations (1, 10 and 100 mug mul(-1)). Cockroaches exhibited higher preferences for the odors associated with reward in these tests, and we therefore conclude that cockroaches can discriminate these odors. However, discrimination of 1-hexanol and trans-2-hexen-1-ol and their binary mixture was imperfect, in that some statistical tests suggested significant level of discrimination but other tests did not. In addition, the cockroaches learned to associate a 1-hexanol solution of the highest or lowest concentration with sucrose reward but failed to learn to associate 1-hexanol of an intermediate concentration with reward.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 797
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION IN JUVENILE EELS
    PESARO, M
    BALSAMO, M
    GANDOLFI, G
    TONGIORGI, P
    MONITORE ZOOLOGICO ITALIANO-ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1981, 15 (04): : 323 - 323
  • [32] An olfactory biconditional discrimination in the mouse
    Dreumont-Boudreau, SE
    Dingle, RN
    Alcolado, GM
    LoLordo, VM
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 87 (03) : 634 - 640
  • [33] Olfactory perceptual stability and discrimination
    Dylan C Barnes
    Rylon D Hofacer
    Ashiq R Zaman
    Robert L Rennaker
    Donald A Wilson
    Nature Neuroscience, 2008, 11 : 1378 - 1380
  • [34] An olfactory discrimination procedure for mice
    Mihalick, SM
    Langlois, JC
    Krienke, JD
    Dube, WV
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2000, 73 (03) : 305 - 318
  • [35] OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION IN GIANT ANTEATER
    MCADAM, DW
    WAY, JS
    NATURE, 1967, 214 (5085) : 316 - &
  • [36] Olfactory perceptual stability and discrimination
    Barnes, Dylan C.
    Hofacer, Rylon D.
    Zaman, Ashiq R.
    Rennaker, Robert L.
    Wilson, Donald A.
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 11 (12) : 1378 - 1380
  • [37] The number of structurally isomeric alcohols of the methanol series
    Henzie, HR
    Blair, CM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1931, 53 (02) : 3042 - 3046
  • [38] Fast Test Generation for Structurally Similar Circuits
    Joe, Jerin
    Mukherjee, Nilanjan
    Pomeranz, Irith
    Rajski, Janusz
    2022 IEEE 40TH VLSI TEST SYMPOSIUM (VTS), 2022,
  • [39] Unsupervised Classification of Structurally Similar Document Images
    Kumar, Jayant
    Doermann, David
    2013 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DOCUMENT ANALYSIS AND RECOGNITION (ICDAR), 2013, : 1225 - 1229
  • [40] DEP domains: structurally similar but functionally different
    Consonni, Sarah V.
    Maurice, Madelon M.
    Bos, Johannes L.
    NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2014, 15 (05) : 357 - 362