Driving-behavior-oriented trajectory planning for autonomous vehicle driving on urban structural road

被引:10
|
作者
Zeng, Dequan [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Zhuoping [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Junqiao [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Peizhi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yishan [1 ,2 ]
Xia, Lang [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Ye [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhiqiang [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Zhiqiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Automot Studies, 4800 Caoan Rd, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Clean Energy Automot Engn Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Coll Elect & Informat Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Intelligent vehicle; trajectory planning; basic path planning; fast-bias RRT; velocity planning; TRACKING CONTROL; APPROXIMATION; ROBOTS;
D O I
10.1177/0954407020969992
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A novel driving-behavior-oriented method is proposed in this paper for improving trajectory planning performance of autonomous vehicle driving on urban structural road. Differ from the irregularity and unpredictability of escaping a maze or travelling on off-road, the driving on road emphasizes more on the compliance of road traffic rules and the satisfaction of passenger comfort rather than purely pursuing the shortest route or the shortest time. Therefore, the driving-behavior-oriented framework is employed in trajectory planning, which divides trajectory into lane change, turn and U-turn, according to the basic traffic rules and the daily behaviors of drivers. The presented approach mainly includes basic path planning, fast-bias RRT path planning and velocity planning. The basic path planning consists of lane change, turn and U-turn behaviors, which generates smooth path with continuous curvature. In order to ensure the completeness of the programming algorithm, a fast-bias RRT (FB-RRT) algorithm is embedded. As guiding by the driving behavior, normal random, goal-bias and Gaussian sampling strategies are fused to form FB-RRT, which could make the best use of the basic path planning and reduce the randomness of node's extension to save the computation time. After collision-free path generating, cubic polynomial curve is employed to schedule velocity profile for coping with vehicle stability requirements, actuator constraints and comfort conditions. The planner has been tested in simulation and a real vehicle in various typical scenarios. Test results illustrate that the presented method could generate a trajectory with controllable extrema of curvature as well as with continuous and smooth enough curvature. Besides, generated trajectory has short length, high success rate (no less than 80% average success rate in complex environment) and real time (the average period is less than 100 ms). Moreover, the velocity profile meets the vehicle stability requirements, actuator constraints, and comfort conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 995
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Road-Aware Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving on Highways
    Yoon, Yookhyun
    Kim, Taeyeon
    Lee, Ho
    Park, Jahnghyon
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (17) : 1 - 20
  • [42] Autonomous vehicle with communicative driving for pedestrian crossing: Trajectory optimization
    Zhang, Meng
    Abbas-Turki, Abdeljalil
    Lombard, Alexandre
    Koukam, Abderrafiaa
    Jo, Kang-Hyun
    [J]. 2020 IEEE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2020,
  • [43] Traffic Mirror-Aware POMDP Behavior Planning for Autonomous Urban Driving
    Zhang, Chi
    Steinhauser, Florian
    Hinz, Gereon
    Knoll, Alois
    [J]. 2022 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM (IV), 2022, : 323 - 330
  • [44] Vehicle Detection and Tracking at Nighttime for Urban Autonomous Driving
    Niknejad, Hossein Tehrani
    Takahashi, Koji
    Mita, Seiichi
    McAllester, David
    [J]. 2011 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS, 2011, : 4442 - 4447
  • [45] Behavior Assessment and Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Vehicles on Structural Urban Roads
    Zuo, Zhiqiang
    Li, Zheng
    Wang, Yijing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2020, : 5683 - 5688
  • [46] A Comparison of Trajectory Planning and Control Frameworks for Cooperative Autonomous Driving
    Viana, Icaro Bezerra
    Kanchwala, Husain
    Ahiska, Kenan
    Aouf, Nabil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (07):
  • [47] Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Ground Vehicles Driving in Structured Environments
    Li, Chao
    Li, Xiaohui
    Li, Junxiang
    Zhu, Qi
    Dai, Bin
    [J]. 2017 NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS AND CYBERNETICS (IHMSC 2017), VOL 2, 2017, : 41 - 46
  • [48] Hybrid Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Driving in Highly Constrained Environments
    Zhang, Yu
    Chen, Huiyan
    Waslander, Steven L.
    Gong, Jianwei
    Xiong, Guangming
    Yang, Tian
    Liu, Kai
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 32800 - 32819
  • [49] PEP: Policy-Embedded Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Driving
    Zhang, Dongkun
    Liang, Jiaming
    Lu, Sha
    Guo, Ke
    Wang, Qi
    Xiong, Rong
    Miao, Zhenwei
    Wang, Yue
    [J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024, 9 (12) : 11361 - 11368
  • [50] Dynamic Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Driving Based on Fluid Simulation
    Sulkowski, Tomasz
    Bugiel, Paulina
    Izydorczyk, Jacek
    [J]. 2019 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METHODS AND MODELS IN AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS (MMAR), 2019, : 265 - 268