Localized root growth in soil induced by controlled-release urea granule and barley nitrogen uptake

被引:14
|
作者
Zhang, M [1 ]
Nyborg, M
Malhi, SS
Solberg, ED
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Melfort, SK S0E 1A0, Canada
[3] Alberta Agr Food & Rural Dev, Agron Unit, Edmonton, AB T6H 4P2, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01904160009382027
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Controlled-release urea is a fertilizer which meters out urea over a long period of time. It can provide a favorable nitrogen (N) concentration for root growth, especially at the early stage of plant development. The objective of this study was to determine the interactions of urea or controlled-release urea granules with barley roots and the resultant N uptake by plants. Two experiments (Experiment I and Experiment II) with treatments of Nil, non-coated urea, Coated I and Coated II (Coated I and Coated II are controlled-release urea products) were conducted in a greenhouse at 23+/-5 degrees C. In both experiments, one barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Duke) seed and one granule of urea or controlled-release urea were placed in a pot (5.2-cm height and 8-cm diameter) containing soil low in mineral N. In Experiment I, shoot and soil samples were taken at 14, 28, and 46 days after seeding. Roots and fertilizer interaction were visually examined and photographed. In Experiment II, root samples both around the fertilizer granule and away from the granule were taken only at 28 days after seeding. In both experiments, dry matter mass and total N content of shoot and root, and mineral N in soil were determined. In Experiment I, at the 28-day sampling roots proliferated around the controlled-release urea granule but not around the urea granule. Shoot N uptake since the 28 days was higher with controlled-release urea than with urea because of the root proliferation. In Experiment II, root dry mass and N content around the granule was higher with controlled-release urea than with urea. In the controlled-release urea treatments, root mass and N content away from the granule were also increased in comparison to the Nil. This shows a stimulus relationship between the two portions of the roots in the same plant, i.e., the roots being accessed to the N source increased growth of the other roots with no access to the source. Because only a small portion of roots was involved in N uptake in the controlled-release urea treatments, the intensity of N uptake per unit of root mass was much higher with controlled-release urea as compared to urea. In conclusion, root growth was enhanced around controlled-release urea granule, and that portion of roots around the fertilizer granule played a major role in absorbing N. In addition, a stimulus relationship existed between roots grown around the granule and those grown away from the granule.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 422
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Blended controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer with straw returning improved soil nitrogen availability, soil microbial community, and root morphology of wheat
    Li, Ruochen
    Gao, Yongxiang
    Chen, Qi
    Li, Zeli
    Gao, Feng
    Meng, Qingmin
    Li, Taige
    Liu, Anran
    Wang, Qin
    Wu, Liang
    Wang, Yong
    Liu, Zhiguang
    Zhang, Min
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2021, 212
  • [22] Controlled-release urea combined with fulvic acid enhanced carbon/nitrogen metabolic processes and maize growth
    Li, Zeli
    Chen, Qi
    Gao, Feng
    Meng, Qingmin
    Li, Mingyang
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhang, Min
    Liu, Zhiguang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2022, 102 (09) : 3644 - 3654
  • [23] Understanding soil water effects on nitrogen release from controlled-release fertilizers
    Verburg, Kirsten
    Bristow, Keith L.
    McLachlan, Gordon D.
    Muster, Tim H.
    Poole, Jacinta M.
    Mardel, James, I
    Zhao, Zhigan
    Wittwer-Schmid, Kathy
    Wong, Mike T. F.
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2021, 85 (01) : 59 - 72
  • [24] Cover crops and controlled-release urea decrease nitrogen mobility and improve nitrogen stock in a tropical sandy soil with cotton cultivation
    dos Santos Cordeiro, Carlos Felipe
    Rodrigues, Daniel Rodela
    de Souza Rorato, Ana Flavia
    Echer, Fabio Rafael
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2022, 46
  • [25] Effects of controlled-release urea combined with fulvic acid on soil inorganic nitrogen, leaf senescence and yield of cotton
    Jibiao Geng
    Xiuyi Yang
    Xianqi Huo
    Jianqiu Chen
    Shutong Lei
    Hui Li
    Ying Lang
    Qianjin Liu
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [26] Effects of controlled-release urea combined with fulvic acid on soil inorganic nitrogen, leaf senescence and yield of cotton
    Geng, Jibiao
    Yang, Xiuyi
    Huo, Xianqi
    Chen, Jianqiu
    Lei, Shutong
    Li, Hui
    Lang, Ying
    Liu, Qianjin
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [27] COMPARISON OF CONTROLLED-RELEASE NITROGEN FERTILIZERS, UREA, AND AMMONIUM-NITRATE ON YIELD AND NITROGEN UPTAKE BY FALL-GROWN HEAD LETTUCE
    PEW, WD
    GARDNER, BR
    BESSEY, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1983, 108 (03) : 448 - 453
  • [28] Effect of nitrogen rates applying controlled-release and conventional urea blend in maize
    Garcia, Pedro Lopes
    Sermarini, Renata Alcarde
    Ocheuze Trivelin, Paulo Cesar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2019, 42 (18) : 2199 - 2208
  • [29] Controlled-release urea improved rice yields by providing nitrogen in synchrony with the nitrogen requirements of plants
    Yang, Xiuyi
    Geng, Jibiao
    Liu, Qianjin
    Zhang, Hanyu
    Hao, Xiaodong
    Sun, Yunbao
    Lu, Xiaofeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2021, 101 (10) : 4183 - 4192
  • [30] Production and levels of foliar nitrogen in rocket salad fertilized with controlled-release nitrogen fertilizers and urea
    Ratke, Rafael Felippe
    Verginassi, Adriana
    Basto, Debora de C.
    Morgado, Helber S.
    de Souza, Milena R. F.
    Fernandes, Eliana Paula
    [J]. HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2011, 29 (02) : 246 - 249