Towards standardization of next-generation sequencing of FFPE samples for clinical oncology: intrinsic obstacles and possible solutions

被引:22
|
作者
Ivanov, Maxim [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Laktionov, Konstantin [4 ]
Breder, Valery [4 ]
Chernenko, Polina [4 ]
Novikova, Ekaterina [5 ]
Telysheva, Ekaterina [5 ]
Musienko, Sergey [2 ]
Baranova, Ancha [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
Mileyko, Vladislav [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] State Univ, Moscow Inst Phys & Technol, Dolgoprudnyi 141700, Moscow Region, Russia
[2] Atlas Biomed Grp, Moscow 121069, Russia
[3] Inst Chem Biol & Fundamental Med SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
[4] Minist Hlth Russian Federat, NN Blokhin Russian Canc Res Ctr, Kashirskoe Sh 24, Moscow 115478, Russia
[5] Minist Healthcare Russian Federat, Russian Sci Ctr Roentgenoradiol, Fed State Budgetary Inst, Russian Sci Ctr Roentgenoradiol RSCRR, Moscow 117485, Russia
[6] Med Genet Res Ctr, Moscow 115478, Russia
[7] George Mason Univ, Sch Syst Biol, Ctr Study Chron Metab & Rare Dis, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
来源
关键词
NGS; Non-small cell lung cancer; Cancer; Oncology; Precision oncology; Targeted therapy; CELL LUNG-CANCER; DE-NOVO; AGGRESSIVE FIBROMATOSIS; TARGETED THERAPIES; COLORECTAL-CANCER; IMATINIB MESYLATE; TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR; READ ALIGNMENT; MUTANT P53; IN-VITRO;
D O I
10.1186/s12967-017-1125-8
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Next generation sequencing has a potential to revolutionize the management of cancer patients within the framework of precision oncology. Nevertheless, lack of standardization decelerated entering of the technology into the clinical testing space. Here we dissected a number of common problems of NGS diagnostics in oncology and introduced ways they can be resolved. Methods: DNA was extracted from 26 formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens and processed with the TrueSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel (Illumina Inc, San Diego, California) targeting 48 cancer-related genes and sequenced in single run. Sequencing data were comparatively analyzed by several bioinformatics pipelines. Results: Libraries yielded sufficient coverage to detect even low prevalent mutations. We found that the number of FFPE sequence artifacts significantly correlates with pre-normalization concentration of libraries (rank correlation -0.81; p < 1e-10), thus, contributing to sample-specific variant detection cut-offs. Surprisingly, extensive validation of EGFR mutation calls by a combination of aligners and variant callers resulted in identification of two false negatives and one false positive that were due to complexity of underlying genomic change, confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Additionally, the study of the non-EGFR amplicons revealed 33 confirmed unique mutations in 17 genes, with TP53 being the most frequently mutated. Clinical relevance of these finding is discussed. Conclusions: Reporting of entire mutational spectrum revealed by targeted sequencing is questionable, at least until the clinically-driven guidelines on reporting of somatic mutations are established. The standardization of sequencing protocols, especially their data analysis components, requires assay-, disease-, and, in many cases, even sample-specific customization that could be performed only in cooperation with clinicians.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical use of next-generation sequencing panel in pediatric oncology patients
    Choi, Jung Yoon
    Park, Hyun Jin
    Kim, Bo Kyung
    Hong, Kyung Taek
    Koh, Jaemoon
    Park, Sung-Hye
    Bae, Jeong Mo
    Yun, Hongseok
    Kang, Hyoung Jin
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (07)
  • [22] The application of next-generation sequencing in the community clinical oncology setting.
    Reddy, Pavan S.
    Rahal, Ahmad Khalil
    Kallail, K. James
    Moore, Dennis Frederic
    Phu Van Truong
    Mattar, Bassam Ibrahim
    Cannon, Michael W.
    Nabbout, Nassim H.
    Page, Seth Joel
    Quoc Van Truong
    Dakhil, Christopher
    Deutsch, Jeremy Michael
    Dakhil, Shaker R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [23] Current practices and guidelines for clinical next-generation sequencing oncology testing
    Samuel P.Strom
    [J]. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2016, 13 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [24] Integrating next-generation sequencing into clinical oncology: strategies, promises and pitfalls
    Horak, Peter
    Frohling, Stefan
    Glimm, Hanno
    [J]. ESMO OPEN, 2016, 1 (05)
  • [25] Standardization, Optimization, and Quality Management of FFPE Solid Tumor Diagnostic Samples in Next-Generation Sequencing: An Experience in Our Tata Memorial Centre India
    Chougule, A.
    Jagtap, V.
    Pange, P.
    Kale, S.
    Chandrani, P.
    Prabhash, K.
    Banavali, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2019, 21 (06): : 1133 - 1134
  • [26] Highly sensitive and multiplexed next-generation sequencing MiSeqDx Extended RAS Panel for FFPE colorectal samples
    Udar, N.
    Porter, M.
    Haigis, R.
    Fabian, J.
    Dunn, T.
    Lee, D.
    Lee, D.
    Gros, T.
    Hasnat, F.
    Lofton-Day, C.
    Jung, S.
    Iyer, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 : S134 - S134
  • [27] Mutation Profiling by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing for Diagnostics and Patient Cohort Screening in FFPE NSCLC Samples
    La Fleur, Linnea
    Moens, Lotte
    Falk-Sorqvist, Elin
    Sundstrom, Magnus
    Mattsson, Johanna S. M.
    Koyi, Hirsh
    Branden, Eva
    Brunnstrom, Hans
    Ekman, Simon
    Sandelin, Martin
    Isaksson, Johan
    Jirstrom, Karin
    Micke, Patrick
    Nilsson, Mats
    Botling, Johan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (09) : S697 - S697
  • [28] Comparison of Spectrophotometry and qPCR for Determining DNA Concentration from FFPE Samples for Next-Generation Sequencing Assay
    Harrington, R.
    Datta, V.
    Camalier, C.
    Walsh, W.
    Sims, D.
    Das, B.
    Lih, C.
    Williams, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2014, 16 (06): : 773 - 773
  • [29] The Analysis of FFPE Samples by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) of Key Genes for Research into Breast and Ovarian Cancers
    Chan, J.
    Eckert, S.
    Georgieva, L.
    Speight, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 20 (03): : S28 - S29
  • [30] Comprehensive Validation of Cytology Samples for Downstream Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing
    Sidiropoulos, N.
    Hampel, K. J.
    Anderson, S. R.
    Schwartz, M.
    Gibson, P. C.
    Giroux, S.
    Leiman, G.
    Balla, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2015, 17 (06): : 844 - 845