Towards standardization of next-generation sequencing of FFPE samples for clinical oncology: intrinsic obstacles and possible solutions

被引:22
|
作者
Ivanov, Maxim [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Laktionov, Konstantin [4 ]
Breder, Valery [4 ]
Chernenko, Polina [4 ]
Novikova, Ekaterina [5 ]
Telysheva, Ekaterina [5 ]
Musienko, Sergey [2 ]
Baranova, Ancha [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
Mileyko, Vladislav [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] State Univ, Moscow Inst Phys & Technol, Dolgoprudnyi 141700, Moscow Region, Russia
[2] Atlas Biomed Grp, Moscow 121069, Russia
[3] Inst Chem Biol & Fundamental Med SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
[4] Minist Hlth Russian Federat, NN Blokhin Russian Canc Res Ctr, Kashirskoe Sh 24, Moscow 115478, Russia
[5] Minist Healthcare Russian Federat, Russian Sci Ctr Roentgenoradiol, Fed State Budgetary Inst, Russian Sci Ctr Roentgenoradiol RSCRR, Moscow 117485, Russia
[6] Med Genet Res Ctr, Moscow 115478, Russia
[7] George Mason Univ, Sch Syst Biol, Ctr Study Chron Metab & Rare Dis, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
来源
关键词
NGS; Non-small cell lung cancer; Cancer; Oncology; Precision oncology; Targeted therapy; CELL LUNG-CANCER; DE-NOVO; AGGRESSIVE FIBROMATOSIS; TARGETED THERAPIES; COLORECTAL-CANCER; IMATINIB MESYLATE; TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR; READ ALIGNMENT; MUTANT P53; IN-VITRO;
D O I
10.1186/s12967-017-1125-8
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Next generation sequencing has a potential to revolutionize the management of cancer patients within the framework of precision oncology. Nevertheless, lack of standardization decelerated entering of the technology into the clinical testing space. Here we dissected a number of common problems of NGS diagnostics in oncology and introduced ways they can be resolved. Methods: DNA was extracted from 26 formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens and processed with the TrueSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel (Illumina Inc, San Diego, California) targeting 48 cancer-related genes and sequenced in single run. Sequencing data were comparatively analyzed by several bioinformatics pipelines. Results: Libraries yielded sufficient coverage to detect even low prevalent mutations. We found that the number of FFPE sequence artifacts significantly correlates with pre-normalization concentration of libraries (rank correlation -0.81; p < 1e-10), thus, contributing to sample-specific variant detection cut-offs. Surprisingly, extensive validation of EGFR mutation calls by a combination of aligners and variant callers resulted in identification of two false negatives and one false positive that were due to complexity of underlying genomic change, confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Additionally, the study of the non-EGFR amplicons revealed 33 confirmed unique mutations in 17 genes, with TP53 being the most frequently mutated. Clinical relevance of these finding is discussed. Conclusions: Reporting of entire mutational spectrum revealed by targeted sequencing is questionable, at least until the clinically-driven guidelines on reporting of somatic mutations are established. The standardization of sequencing protocols, especially their data analysis components, requires assay-, disease-, and, in many cases, even sample-specific customization that could be performed only in cooperation with clinicians.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards standardization of next-generation sequencing of FFPE samples for clinical oncology: intrinsic obstacles and possible solutions
    Maxim Ivanov
    Konstantin Laktionov
    Valery Breder
    Polina Chernenko
    Ekaterina Novikova
    Ekaterina Telysheva
    Sergey Musienko
    Ancha Baranova
    Vladislav Mileyko
    [J]. Journal of Translational Medicine, 15
  • [2] Next-Generation Sequencing in Clinical Oncology: Next Steps Towards Clinical Validation
    Bennett, Nigel C.
    Farah, Camile S.
    [J]. CANCERS, 2014, 6 (04): : 2296 - 2312
  • [3] Clinical utility of next-generation sequencing in precision oncology
    Hux, Anna
    Lewis, Amanda
    Sachwitz, Drew
    Gregory, Tanya
    [J]. JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2019, 32 (01): : 35 - 39
  • [4] A Bioinformatics Toolkit for Next-Generation Sequencing in Clinical Oncology
    Cabello-Aguilar, Simon
    Vendrell, Julie A.
    Solassol, Jerome
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2023, 45 (12) : 9737 - 9752
  • [5] Clinical Applications of Next-Generation Sequencing in Precision Oncology
    Karlovich, Chris A.
    Williams, P. Mickey
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (04): : 264 - 271
  • [6] Next-Generation Sequencing Based MiseqDx Extended RAS panel for FFPE Colorectal Samples
    Iyer, A.
    Haigis, R.
    Porter, M.
    Fabian, J.
    Gros, T.
    Hasnat, F.
    Dunn, T.
    Saad, W.
    Lin, E.
    Ong, F.
    Harris, M.
    Udar, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2014, 16 (06): : 771 - 771
  • [7] Optimized Sample and Library Preparation of FFPE Tumor Samples for Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing
    Nitin, U.
    Haigis, R.
    Jaeger, E. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2012, 14 (06): : 720 - 721
  • [8] A novel, statistical-based method to determine RNA expression by next-generation sequencing in clinical FFPE samples
    Shoemaker, Robert
    Berlin, Aaron
    Diliberto, Amy
    Ely, Heather
    Chen, Marissa
    Murphy, Danielle
    Christiansen, Jason
    Reuter, Vince
    Licon, Abel
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [9] Next-generation sequencing of FFPE solid tumor specimens for clinical use.
    Yelensky, Roman
    Wang, Kai
    Dogan, Snjezana
    Borsu, Laetitia
    Frampton, Garrett
    Lipson, Doron
    Stephens, Philip
    Bastian, Boris
    Klimstra, David
    Ladanyi, Marc
    Cronin, Maureen T.
    Hedvat, Cyrus
    Berger, Michael F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [10] Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing for Precision Oncology in Rare Cancers
    Groisberg, Roman
    Hong, David S.
    Roszik, Jason
    Janku, Filip
    Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.
    Javle, Milind
    Meric-Bernstam, Funda
    Subbiah, Vivek
    [J]. MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 17 (07) : 1595 - 1601