COMPARISON OF GLOBAL GEOPOTENTIAL MODELS FROM THE CHAMP AND GRACE MISSIONS FOR REGIONAL GEOID MODELLING IN TURKEY

被引:18
|
作者
Erol, Bihter [1 ]
Sideris, Michael G. [2 ]
Celik, Rahmi N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Geodesy & Photogrammetry Engn, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Geomat Engn, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
Global Geopotential Models; CHAMP; GRACE; GPS/levelling; filtering; gravity anomalies; Remove-Compute-Restore method;
D O I
10.1007/s11200-009-0032-8
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The continuous efforts on establishment and modernization of the geodetic control in Turkey include a number of regional geiod models that have been determined since 1976. The recently released gravimetric Geoid of Turkey, TG03, is used in geodetic applications where GPS-heights need to be converted to the local vertical datum. To reach a regional geoid model with improved accuracy, the selection of the appropriate global geopotential model is of primary importance. This study assesses the performance of a number of recent satellite-only and combined global geopotential models (GCMs) derived from CHAMP and GRACE missions' data in comparison to the older EGM96 model, which is the underlying reference model for TG03. In this respect, gravity anomalies and geoid heights from the global geopotential models were compared with terrestrial gravity data and low-pass filtered GPS/levelling data, respectively. Also, five new gravimetric geoid models, computed by the Fast Fourier Transform technique using terrestrial gravity data and the geopotential models, were validated at the GPS/levelling benchmarks. The findings were also compared with the validation results of the TG03 model. The tests showed that as it was expected any of the high-degree combined models (EIGEN-CG03C, EIGEN-GL04C, EGM96) can be employed for determining the gravity anomalies over Turkey. In the west of Turkey, EGM96 and EIGEN-CHAMP03S fit the GPS/levelling surface better. However, all the tested GGMs revealed equal performance when they were employed in gravimetric geoid modelling after de-trending the gravimetric geoid model with corrector surface fitting. The new geoid models have improved accuracy (after fit) compared to TG03.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 441
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of global geopotential models from the champ and grace missions for regional geoid modelling in Turkey
    Bihter Erol
    Michael G. Sideris
    Rahmi N. Çelik
    [J]. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2009, 53 : 419 - 441
  • [2] Assessment of Global Geopotential Models for Modelling Malaysia Marine Geoid
    Yahaya, Noor Anim Zanariah
    Din, Ami Hassan Md
    Omar, Abdullah Hisam
    Abdullah, Nazirah Mohamad
    Yazid, Nornajihah Mohammad
    Pa'suya, Muhammad Faiz
    Wahab, Mohamad Ikbar Abdul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED ENGINEERING, 2022, 14 (05): : 13 - 24
  • [3] Comparison of CHAMP and GRACE geopotential models with terrestrial gravity field data in Hungary
    Tóth Gy.
    Rózsa Sz.
    [J]. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica, 2006, 41 (2): : 171 - 180
  • [4] Rigorous evaluation of global geopotential models for geoid modelling: A case study in Kenya
    Nyoka, Chivatsi Jonathan
    Din, Ami Hassan Md
    Pa'suya, Muhammad Faiz
    Omar, Abdullah Hisam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2022, 194
  • [5] Spectral evaluation of Earth geopotential models and an experiment on its regional improvement for geoid modelling
    Erol, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2012, 121 (03) : 823 - 835
  • [6] Improvement of GOCE-Based Global Geopotential Models for Gravimetric Geoid Modeling in Turkey
    Isik, Mustafa Serkan
    cevikalp, Muhammed Rasit
    Erol, Bihter
    Erol, Serdar
    [J]. GEOSCIENCES, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [7] Spectral evaluation of Earth geopotential models and an experiment on its regional improvement for geoid modelling
    B EROL
    [J]. Journal of Earth System Science, 2012, 121 : 823 - 835
  • [8] Comparison of global and local gravimetric geoid models in Turkey
    Yilmaz, Nazan
    Karaali, Celalettin
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ESSAYS, 2010, 5 (14): : 1829 - 1839
  • [9] Impact of the new GRACE Geopotential Model and SRTM data on the geoid modelling in Algeria
    Daho, S. A. Benahmed
    Mendas, A.
    Fairhead, J. D.
    Derkaoui, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2009, 47 (2-3) : 63 - 71
  • [10] Global Geopotential Models assessment in Ecuador based on geoid heights and geopotential values
    Carrion, Jose
    Flores, Fredy
    Rodriguez, Freddy
    Pozo, Miguel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE, 2023, 13 (01)