Characteristics of high-impact agronomic journals

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Yajie [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci & Minist Water Resources, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
USE EFFICIENCY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SELF-CITATION; YIELD; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; COCITATION; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1002/agj2.20320
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agronomy journals form a core part of the process of scholarly communication and scientific research in the agronomic field. Determining the key features of high-impact agronomic journals will be a central component for identifying the disciplinary development in the field of agronomy. In this study, we conducted a bibliometric study to fill this knowledge gap based on 64,703 articles published in 18 main agronomy journals since 1948 derived from the Scopus database. Our main findings were that (a) over 20% of publications in Advances in Agronomy and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology received more than 50 citations; (b) authors from the United States, China, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia published the most articles in these journals, comprising 22.4, 11.5, 10.7, 8.7, and 8.0% of the total number of publications, respectively; and (c) journals published in a given country had a greater number of papers published by authors of that country than by authors of other countries. Furthermore, three clusters for these 18 journals were identified that included the topics of agronomy, interactions between agronomy and soil sciences, and interactions between agronomy and plant sciences. The results of this study provide valuable insights regarding the current state of and future development trends in agronomic journals.
引用
收藏
页码:3878 / 3890
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals
    Keeble, Claire
    Barber, Stuart
    Law, Graham Richard
    Baxter, Paul D.
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2013, 3 (04):
  • [22] Questionable University-sponsored supplements in high-impact journals
    Xiaotian Chen
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105 : 1985 - 1995
  • [23] Acceptance and publication times in high-impact general medical journals
    Sebo, Paul
    [J]. INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (08) : 2441 - 2446
  • [24] Financial conflicts of interest among editorialists in high-impact journals
    Kaestner, V.
    Prasad, V.
    [J]. BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL, 2017, 7 : e611 - e611
  • [25] The contribution of high-impact clinical journals to science: the case of The Lancet
    Ugalde, Antonio
    Homedes, Nuria
    [J]. SALUD COLECTIVA, 2013, 9 (01): : 5 - 10
  • [26] Internationalization of high-impact gastroenterology journals, 1970-2005
    Hart, Phil A.
    Ibdah, Jamal A.
    Marshall, John B.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (04) : A349 - A349
  • [27] Financial conflicts of interest among editorialists in high-impact journals
    V Kaestner
    V Prasad
    [J]. Blood Cancer Journal, 2017, 7 : e611 - e611
  • [28] Reporting of Results in ClinicalTrials.gov and High-Impact Journals
    Becker, Jessica E.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Ben-Josef, Gal
    Ross, Joseph S.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (10): : 1063 - 1065
  • [29] Quality of Reporting of Neonatal and Infant Trials in High-Impact Journals
    DeMauro, Sara B.
    Giaccone, Annie
    Kirpalani, Haresh
    Schmidt, Barbara
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2011, 128 (03) : E639 - E644
  • [30] The gender role in the publishing of Authorships in high-impact orthopedic journals
    E. Vitale
    D. Bizzoca
    F. Di Dio
    A. Moretti
    B. Moretti
    [J]. MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2024, 108 (3) : 289 - 295