Development of a solid-phase microextraction method for the analysis of phenolic flame retardants in water samples

被引:102
|
作者
Polo, Maria [1 ]
Llompart, Maria [1 ]
Garcia-Jares, Carmen [1 ]
Gomez-Noya, Guadalupe [1 ]
Bollain, Maria-Herminia [1 ]
Cela, Rafael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac Quim, Inst Invest & Anal Alimentario, Dept Quim Analit Nutr & Bromatol, E-15782 Santiago De Compostela, Spain
关键词
factorial design; water analysis; waste water; solid-phase microextraction; headspace analysis; bromophenols; tetrabromobisphenol A; tetrachlorobisphenol A; phenols; chlorophenols; methylphenols;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.047
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method for the ultra-trace determination of brominated phenols in aqueous samples has been developed and is reported for the first time to the best of our knowledge. 3,5,3',5'-tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), the most widely used brominated flame retardant, and other phenolic flame retardants in commercial use, such as 2,4-dibromophenol (2,4-DBP), 2,4,6-tribromophenol (TBP) and pentabromophenol (PBP) have been included as target analytes. The analytical procedure involves the in situ acetylation-SPME and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) determination of the target analytes. A multi-factor categorical experimental design was created to study the main parameters affecting the extraction efficiency, allowing also the evaluation of interaction effects between factors. The factors studied were type of fiber, extraction mode, exposing the fiber directly into the sample (DSPME) or into the headspace over the sample (HSSPME), and extraction temperature. Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CAR-PDMS) fiber appeared to be the most suitable of the five fibers tested for the extraction of most compounds, excluding PBP and TBBPA for which polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was the most efficient coating. The highest response was achieved for both fibers sampling in headspace mode at 100 degrees C. In order to test the linearity of the method, calibration studies were performed with both CAR-PDMS and PDMS coatings. For both fibers, the method was linear in a range of 2 orders of magnitude, giving relative standard deviation (RSD%) below 10% for most compounds and detection limp its at the low pg/mL level. In addition, the feasibility of the method for simultaneous determination of chlorinated and brominated phenols was studied. Finally, the method was applied to several real samples including tap water and effluent and influent waste water samples from an urban treatment plant. in which several phenolic compounds, such as phenol, methylphenols and chlorophenols, could be detected and quantified. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All fights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 21
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New approach based on solid-phase microextraction to estimate polydimethylsiloxane fibre coating-water distribution coefficients for brominated flame retardants
    Polo, Maria
    Casas, Vanessa
    Llompart, Maria
    Garcia-Jares, Carmen
    Cela, Rafael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2006, 1124 (1-2) : 121 - 129
  • [42] Cost analysis of ELISA, solid-phase extraction, and solid-phase microextraction for the monitoring of pesticides in water
    Dalvie, MA
    Sinanovic, E
    London, L
    Cairncross, E
    Solomon, A
    Adam, H
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 98 (01) : 143 - 150
  • [43] Applications of solid-phase microextraction to chemical analysis of live biological samples
    Augusto, F
    Valente, ALP
    [J]. TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 21 (6-7) : 428 - 438
  • [44] Solid-phase microextraction and headspace solid-phase microextraction for the determination of high molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water and soil samples
    Doong, RA
    Chang, SM
    Sun, YC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCIENCE, 2000, 38 (12) : 528 - 534
  • [45] Interface for Reproducible, Multishot Direct Analysis of Solid-Phase Microextraction Samples
    Newsome, G. Asher
    Kavich, Gwenaelle
    Alvarez-Martin, Alba
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 92 (06) : 4182 - 4186
  • [46] Solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography: A new method for the analysis of organics in water
    Eisert, R
    Levsen, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1996, 733 (1-2) : 143 - 157
  • [47] SOLID-PHASE MICROEXTRACTION FOR THE DIRECT ANALYSIS OF WATER - THEORY AND PRACTICE
    ARTHUR, CL
    POTTER, DW
    BUCHHOLZ, KD
    MOTLAGH, S
    PAWLISZYN, J
    [J]. LC GC-MAGAZINE OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 1992, 10 (09): : 656 - &
  • [48] Analysis of pyrethroids in sediment pore water by solid-phase microextraction
    Bondarenko, Svetlana
    Spurlock, Frank
    Gan, Jianying
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2007, 26 (12) : 2587 - 2593
  • [49] Determination of chemical warfare agents in natural water samples by solid-phase microextraction
    Lakso, HA
    Ng, WF
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 69 (10) : 1866 - 1872
  • [50] Polypyrrole-montmorillonite nanocomposite as sorbent for solid-phase microextraction of phenolic compounds in water
    Abolghasemi, Mir Mahdi
    Parastari, Sheyda
    Yousefi, Vahid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2014, 37 (23) : 3526 - 3532