Decision tree analysis to evaluate risks associated with lameness on dairy farms with automated milking systems

被引:0
|
作者
Davis, Lindsey [1 ]
Deb, Kalyanmoy [2 ]
Siegford, Janice [3 ]
Ali, Ahmed B. A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Anim & Vet Sci Dept, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, E Lansing, MI USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, E Lansing, MI USA
[4] Cairo Univ, Anim Behav & Management, Vet Med, Cairo, Egypt
来源
关键词
dairy cows; lameness; automatic milking system; decision tree; welfare; ENSURE HIGH REPEATABILITY; BODY CONDITION SCORE; LYING BEHAVIOR; TRAINING-PROGRAM; HOCK LESIONS; COW COMFORT; CATTLE; HEALTH; MANAGEMENT; INJURIES;
D O I
10.3389/fanim.2022.999261
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Lameness is an endemic disorder causing health problems and production losses in the dairy cow industry. The objective of this study was to identify cow and farm-level factors associated with lameness on Automatic Milking System (AMS) farms, using decision tree analysis to assign probabilities to each input. AMS farms across Canada and Michigan were evaluated to identify the most substantial farm (i.e., stall design, bedding) and cow-level (i.e., BCS, leg injuries) factors associated with prevalence of lameness. To assess lameness, videos of cows were used, and cows with a head bob or noticeable limp were categorized as lame. A decision tree classification model used 1378 data points from 39 pens across 36 farms to predict the value of the target class through "tree function" in MATLAB. The primary classifier was identified as type of stall base, dividing the data set into 3 categories: 1) rubber, sand, or geotextile mat flooring, 2) concrete base, and 3) other types of stall base. Within the first category (class membership (CM) = 976), bedding quantity was the secondary classifier, which was divided by cows standing on >= 2 cm (CM=456) or <2 cm (CM=520) of bedding. Bedding quantity was divided into the third most important classifier of BCS, and cow fit stall width. Cows with BCS of 3.25 to 4.5 (CM=307) were defined as non-lame with an estimated probability (EP) of 0.59, while cows with BCS of 2 to 2.5 (CM=213) were further split by hock lesion incidence. Cows without lesions were defined non-lame (EP=0.93) and cows with lesions were defined lame (EP=0.07). Cows that fit stall width were defined as non-lame (EP=0.66) and cows that did not fit were further divided by the width of the feed alley. Farms with >= 430 cm feed alley were defined as non-lame (EP=0.89), whereas farms with <430 cm feed alley were defined as lame (EP=0.11). Through implementing a novel multifactorial approach of data analysis, we were able to highlight the critical points that can be focused on to enhance farm-level housing and management practices or mitigate or monitor cow-level issues to reduce incidence and severity of lameness in AMS farms.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision tree analysis to evaluate risks associated with lameness on dairy farms with automated milking systems
    Davis, L.
    Deb, K.
    Siegford, J.
    Ali, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 : 73 - 74
  • [2] Is lameness a welfare problem in dairy farms with automatic milking systems?
    Klaas, IC
    Rousing, T
    Fossing, C
    Hindhede, J
    Sorensen, JT
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2003, 12 (04) : 599 - 603
  • [3] Cow- and farm-level risk factors for lameness on dairy farms with automated milking systems
    Westin, R.
    Vaughan, A.
    de Passille, A. M.
    DeVries, T. J.
    Pajor, E. A.
    Pellerin, D.
    Siegford, J. M.
    Witaifi, A.
    Vasseur, E.
    Rushen, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (05) : 3732 - 3743
  • [4] Lameness, productivity and cow behavior in dairy herds with automated milking systems
    King, M. T.
    Pajor, E. A.
    LeBlanc, S. J.
    DeVries, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 34 - 34
  • [5] Analysis of Dairy Cow Behavior during Milking Associated with Lameness
    Schonberger, Diana
    Berthel, Roxanne Magali
    Savary, Pascal
    Bodmer, Michele
    [J]. DAIRY, 2023, 4 (04) : 554 - 570
  • [6] Farm-level factors associated with lameness prevalence, productivity, and milk quality in farms with automated milking systems
    Matson, R. D.
    King, M. T. M.
    Duffield, T. F.
    Santschi, D. E.
    Orsel, K.
    Pajor, E. A.
    Penner, G. B.
    Mutsvangwa, T.
    DeVries, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (01) : 793 - 806
  • [7] Profitability on dairy farms with automatic milking systems compared to farms with conventional milking systems
    Hansen, Bojrn Gunnar
    Herje, Hans Olav
    Hova, Jonas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 22 (02): : 215 - 228
  • [8] Considerations for Minimizing Lameness in Automated Milking Systems (AMS).
    Kleinschmit, D. H.
    Weyers, J. S.
    Geiger, A. J.
    Ashworth, C. D.
    Socha, M. T.
    Olson, R. L.
    Sutton, F. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 27 - 28
  • [9] Effect of lameness on dairy cows' visits to automatic milking systems
    Borderas, T. F.
    Fournier, A.
    Rushen, J.
    De Passille, A. M. B.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 88 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [10] Producer estimates of prevalence and perceived importance of lameness in dairy herds with tiestalls, freestalls, and automated milking systems
    Cutler, J. H. Higginson
    Rushen, J.
    de Passille, A. M.
    Gibbons, J.
    Orsel, K.
    Pajor, E.
    Barkema, H. W.
    Solano, L.
    Pellerin, D.
    Haley, D.
    Vasseur, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2017, 100 (12) : 9871 - 9880