Producer estimates of prevalence and perceived importance of lameness in dairy herds with tiestalls, freestalls, and automated milking systems

被引:29
|
作者
Cutler, J. H. Higginson [1 ]
Rushen, J. [2 ]
de Passille, A. M. [2 ]
Gibbons, J. [2 ]
Orsel, K. [3 ]
Pajor, E. [3 ]
Barkema, H. W. [3 ]
Solano, L. [3 ]
Pellerin, D. [4 ]
Haley, D. [1 ]
Vasseur, E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Ontario Vet Coll, Dept Populat Med, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dairy Educ & Res Ctr, Agassiz, BC V0M 1A0, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Prod Anim Hlth, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[4] Univ Laval, Dept Sci Anim, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Quebec City, PQ H9X 3V9, Canada
关键词
lameness prevalence; producer perception; tiestall; freestall; automated milking system; PAPILLOMATOUS DIGITAL DERMATITIS; ENSURE HIGH REPEATABILITY; LEVEL RISK-FACTORS; TIE-STALLS; LYING TIME; BODY CONDITION; LEG LESIONS; DISEASE PREVENTION; TRAINING-PROGRAM; FOOT LESIONS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2017-13008
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Lameness is one of the most important welfare and productivity concerns in the dairy industry. Our objectives were to obtain producers' estimates of its prevalence and their perceptions of lameness, and to investigate how producers monitor lameness in tiestall (TS), freestall with milking parlor (FS), and automated milking system (AMS) herds. Forty focal cows per farm in 237 Canadian dairy herds were scored for lameness by trained researchers. On the same day, the producers completed a questionnaire. Mean herd-level prevalence of lameness estimated by producers was 9.0% (+/- 0.9%; +/- SE), whereas the researchers observed a mean prevalence of 22.2% (+/- 0.9%). Correlation between producer- and researcher-estimated lameness prevalence was low (r = 0.19) and mean researcher prevalence was 1.6, 1.8, and 4.1 times higher in AMS, FS, and TS farms, respectively. A total of 48% of producers thought lameness was a moderate or major problem in their herds (TS = 34%; AMS = 53%; FS = 59%). One third of producers considered lameness the highest ranked health problem they were trying to control, whereas two-thirds of producers (TS = 43%; AMS = 63%; FS = 71%) stated that they had made management changes to deal with lameness in the past 2 yr. Almost all producers (98%) stated they routinely check cows to identify new cases of lameness; however, 40% of producers did not keep records of lameness (AMS = 24%; FS = 23%; TS = 60%). A majority (69%) of producers treated lame cows themselves immediately after detection, whereas 13% relied on hoof-trimmer or veterinarians to plan treatment. Producers are aware of lameness as an issue in dairy herds and almost all monitor lameness as part of their daily routine. However, producers underestimate lameness prevalence, which highlights that lameness detection continues to be difficult in in all housing systems, especially in TS herds. Training to improve detection, record keeping, identification of farm-specific risk factors, and treatment planning for lame cows is likely to help decrease lameness prevalence.
引用
收藏
页码:9871 / 9880
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Lameness, productivity and cow behavior in dairy herds with automated milking systems
    King, M. T.
    Pajor, E. A.
    LeBlanc, S. J.
    DeVries, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 34 - 34
  • [2] Associations of herd-level housing, management, and lameness prevalence with productivity and cow behavior in herds with automated milking systems
    King, M. T. M.
    Pajor, E. A.
    LeBlanc, S. J.
    DeVries, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (11) : 9069 - 9079
  • [3] Decision tree analysis to evaluate risks associated with lameness on dairy farms with automated milking systems
    Davis, Lindsey
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    Siegford, Janice
    Ali, Ahmed B. A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 3
  • [4] Decision tree analysis to evaluate risks associated with lameness on dairy farms with automated milking systems
    Davis, L.
    Deb, K.
    Siegford, J.
    Ali, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 : 73 - 74
  • [5] Shorter sampling periods and accurate estimates of milk volume and components are possible for pasture based dairy herds milked with automated milking systems
    Kamphuis, Claudia
    Burke, Jennie K.
    Taukiri, Sarah
    Petch, Susan-Fay
    Turner, Sally-Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2016, 83 (03) : 326 - 333
  • [6] Cow- and farm-level risk factors for lameness on dairy farms with automated milking systems
    Westin, R.
    Vaughan, A.
    de Passille, A. M.
    DeVries, T. J.
    Pajor, E. A.
    Pellerin, D.
    Siegford, J. M.
    Witaifi, A.
    Vasseur, E.
    Rushen, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (05) : 3732 - 3743
  • [7] Associations of herd-level housing, management, and lameness prevalence with productivity and cow behavior in herds with automated milking systems (vol 99, pg 9069, 2016)
    King, M. T. M.
    Pajor, E. A.
    LeBlanc, S. J.
    DeVries, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2017, 100 (11) : 9476 - 9476
  • [8] Farm-level factors associated with lameness prevalence, productivity, and milk quality in farms with automated milking systems
    Matson, R. D.
    King, M. T. M.
    Duffield, T. F.
    Santschi, D. E.
    Orsel, K.
    Pajor, E. A.
    Penner, G. B.
    Mutsvangwa, T.
    DeVries, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (01) : 793 - 806
  • [9] Assessing the accuracy of inline milk fat-to-protein ratio data as an indicator of hyperketonemia in dairy cows in herds with automated milking systems
    King, M. T. M.
    Duffield, T. F.
    DeVries, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (09) : 8417 - 8422