State child care regulations regarding infant sleep environment since the healthy child care America-Back to Sleep campaign

被引:12
|
作者
Moon, RY
Kotch, L
Aird, L
机构
[1] Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Div Gen Pediat & Community Hlth, Ctr Hlth Serv & Community Res, Childrens Res Inst, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Div Gen Pediat & Community Hlth, Goldberg Ctr Community Pediat Hlth, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Pediat, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[4] Amer Acad Pediat, Div Dev Pediat & Prevent Sci, Early Educ & Child Care Initiat, Elk Grove Village, IL USA
关键词
sudden infant death syndrome; risk reduction; regulation; child care; sleep position;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2005-3055
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Despite overall decreases in sudden infant death syndrome deaths and prone sleeping, the proportion of sudden infant death syndrome deaths that occurs in child care settings has remained constant at similar to 20%. In 2003, the American Academy of Pediatrics' Healthy Child Care America program launched its own Back to Sleep campaign to promote the Back to Sleep message for those who care for young children. OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the first 2 years of the Healthy Child Care America-Back to Sleep campaign in improving child care regulations by assessing the inclusion of the elements of a safe sleep environment in the individual state regulations for child care centers and family child care homes. METHODS. We examined regulations available in October 2005 for licensed child care centers and family child care homes in the 50 states and the District of Columbia for specific regulations pertaining to ( 1) sudden infant death syndrome risk-reduction training for child care providers, ( 2) infant sleep position, ( 3) crib safety, ( 4) bedding safety, ( 5) smoking, and ( 6) provision of information about sleep positioning policies and arrangements to parents before the infant is enrolled in child care. RESULTS. Since 2003, when the Healthy Child Care America-Back to Sleep campaign began, 60 of the 101 state regulations for either child care centers or FCCHs have been revised. More than half of these regulations written since 2003 mandate a nonprone sleep position and restrictions on soft bedding in the crib, and the change in these regulations since 2003 is statistically significant. However, of the 101 existing state regulations, only 49 require that infants sleep nonprone, 18 mandate sudden infant death syndrome training for child care providers, 81 have >= 1 crib safety standard, and 43 restrict soft bedding in the crib. Only 4 regulations require that parents be provided with sleep policy information. CONCLUSIONS. The initial 2 years of the Healthy Child Care America Back to Sleep campaign have been successful in promoting safe infant sleep regulations. Efforts must continue so that safe sleep regulations exist in all jurisdictions.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 83
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Are State Child Care Regulations Meeting National Oral Health and Nutritional Standards?
    Kim, Juhee
    Kaste, Linda M.
    Fadavi, Shahrbanoo
    Neelon, Sara E. Benjamin
    [J]. PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2012, 34 (04) : 317 - 324
  • [32] Obesity prevention in child care: A review of U.S. state regulations
    Sara E Benjamin
    Angie Cradock
    Elizabeth M Walker
    Meghan Slining
    Matthew W Gillman
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 8
  • [33] Early feeding in child care in the United States: Are state regulations supporting breastfeeding?
    Gonzalez-Nahm, Sarah
    Grossman, Elyse R.
    Frost, Natasha
    Benjamin-Neelon, Sara E.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 105 : 232 - 236
  • [34] Rolling back of the state in child care? Evidence from urban China
    Zhang, Yanxia
    Maclean, Mavis
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL POLICY, 2012, 32 (11-12) : 664 - 681
  • [35] Quality of the infant/toddler feeding and physical activity environment in child care centers
    Hamilton, JC
    Wasser, H
    Bentley, ME
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2006, 20 (04): : A7 - A7
  • [36] Does the quality of a child care setting impact preschool children's sleep?
    Burnham, MM
    Harris, SG
    [J]. SLEEP, 2005, 28 : A106 - A106
  • [37] The importance of the intensive care unit environment in sleep-A study with healthy participants
    Reinke, Laurens
    Haveman, Marjolein
    Horsten, Sandra
    Falck, Thomas
    van der Heide, Esther M.
    Pastoor, Sander
    van der Hoeven, Johannes H.
    Absalom, Anthony R.
    Tulleken, Jaap E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (02)
  • [38] Family child care in the United States: A comparative analysis of 1981 and 1998 state regulations
    McGaha C.G.
    Snow C.W.
    Teleki J.K.
    [J]. Early Childhood Education Journal, 2001, 28 (4) : 251 - 255
  • [39] Sleep Health among Children Adopted from Foster Care: The Moderating Effect of Parent-Child Sleep Interactions
    Cifre, Anthony B.
    Budnick, Christopher J.
    Bick, Johanna
    Mcglinchey, Eleanor L.
    Ripple, Carol H.
    Wolfson, Amy R.
    Alfano, Candice A.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (04) : 472 - 487
  • [40] EARLY POSITIVE PARENT-CHILD INTERACTIONS AND ENRICHED HOME ENVIRONMENT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH BETTER INFANT SLEEP
    Jiao, Nana
    Petrov, Megan
    Reifsnider, Elizabeth
    [J]. SLEEP, 2021, 44 : A62 - A63