The common origin of family and non-family asteroids

被引:29
|
作者
Dermott, Stanley F. [1 ]
Christou, Apostolos A. [2 ]
Li, Dan [3 ,5 ]
Kehoe, Thomas. J. J. [4 ]
Robinson, J. Malcolm [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Astron, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Armagh Observ & Planetarium, Armagh, North Ireland
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Phys & Astron, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Florida Space Inst, Orlando, FL USA
[5] Natl Opt Astron Observ, Tucson, AZ 85726 USA
来源
NATURE ASTRONOMY | 2018年 / 2卷 / 07期
关键词
BELT; EVOLUTION; IDENTIFICATION; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41550-018-0482-4
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
All asteroids are currently classified as either family, originating from the disruption of known bodies(1), or non-family. An outstanding question is the origin of these non-family asteroids. Were they formed individually, or as members of known families but with chaotically evolving orbits, or are they members of old ghost families, that is, asteroids with a common parent body but with orbits that no longer cluster in orbital element space? Here, we show that the sizes of the non-family asteroids in the inner belt are correlated with their orbital eccentricities and anticorrelated with their inclinations, suggesting that both non-family and family asteroids originate from a small number of large primordial planetesimals. We estimate that similar to 85% of the asteroids in the inner main belt originate from the Flora, Vesta, Nysa, Polana and Eulalia families, with the remaining similar to 15% originating from either the same families or, more likely, a few ghost families. These new results imply that we must seek explanations for the differing characteristics of the various meteorite groups in the evolutionary histories of a few, large, precursor bodies(2). Our findings also support the model that asteroids formed big through the gravitational collapse of material in a protoplanetary disk(3).
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 554
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Are Family Firms More Levered? An Analysis of Family and Non-Family Firms
    Haider, Jahanzaib
    Qayyum, Abdul
    Zainudin, Zalina
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [22] The determinants of non-family employees' turnover intentions in family firms
    Yazici, Omer
    Memili, Esra
    Patel, Pankaj C.
    Ramadani, Veland
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP & SMALL BUSINESS, 2023, 49 (04):
  • [23] Socially responsible downsizing: Comparing family and non-family firms
    Sanchez-Bueno, Maria J.
    Munoz-Bullon, Fernando
    Galan, Jose I.
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2020, 29 (01) : 35 - 55
  • [24] Firm ownership and productivity: a study of family and non-family SMEs
    Francesco Barbera
    Ken Moores
    [J]. Small Business Economics, 2013, 40 : 953 - 976
  • [25] Are family firms more optimistic than non-family firms?
    Huang, Xuan
    Kang, Fei
    [J]. ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 32 (03) : 399 - 416
  • [26] In a Family Way? A model of family firm identity maintenance by non-family members
    Ponroy, Julia Vincent
    Le, Patrick
    Pradies, Camille
    [J]. ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2019, 40 (06) : 859 - 886
  • [27] Small family business performance: comparison between family and non-family enterprises
    Kirmanen, Antti
    Kansikas, Juha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURING, 2010, 2 (3-4) : 291 - 307
  • [28] Bankruptcy at family and non-family firms: do they fail differently?
    Mitter, Christine
    Walcher, Michaela
    Mayr, Stefan
    Duller, Christine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 12 (04) : 1096 - 1112
  • [29] Are Family Firms Financially Healthier Than Non-Family Firm?
    Ntoung, Lious Agbor Tabot
    Santos de Oliveira, Helena Maria
    de Sousa, Benjamim Manuel Ferreira
    Pimentel, Liliana Marques
    Bastos, Susana Adelina Moreira Carvalho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [30] The success factors of family and non-family firms: Similarities and differences
    Zajkowski, Robert
    Safin, Krzysztof
    Stanczyk, Elzbieta
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2022, 10 (03) : 51 - 72