Validity of discrete-choice experiments evidence for health risk reduction

被引:68
|
作者
Telser, Harry
Zweifel, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Socioecon Inst, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Plant Econ, Regensdorf, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00036840500427858
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There is growing interest in discrete-choice experiment (DCE) as a method to elicit consumers' preferences in the health care sector. Increasingly this method is used to determine willingness to pay (WTP) for health-related goods. However, its external validity in the health care domain has not been investigated until now. This paper examines the external validity of DCE concerning the reduction of a health risk. Convergent validity is examined by comparing the value of a statistical life with other preference elicitation techniques, such as revealed preference. Criterion validity is shown by comparing WTP values derived from stated choices in the experiment with those derived from actual choices made by the same individuals. Both tests provide strong evidence in favour of external validity of the DCE method.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 78
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECTS ON COMPENSATING VARIATION OF NUMBER AND KIND OF COMPETING SUBSTITUTES IN DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
    Gonzalez, J. M.
    Johnson, F. R.
    MacDonald, K., V
    Marshall, D.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A196 - A196
  • [32] For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health
    Krucien, Nicolas
    Sicsic, Jonathan
    Ryan, Mandy
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 28 (04) : 572 - 586
  • [33] RISK COMMUNICATION FOR DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
    Weissler, E.
    Wallace, M. J.
    Yang, J. C.
    Brotzman, L. E.
    Corriere, M. A.
    Ea, Secemsky
    Sutphin, J.
    Johnson, R.
    Gonzalez, J.
    Me, Tarver
    Saha, A.
    Gebben, D.
    Chen, A. L.
    Malone, M.
    Farb, A.
    Zikmund-Fisher, B. J.
    Reed, S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S556 - S556
  • [34] Discrete-choice experiments versus rating scale exercises to evaluate the importance of attributes
    Wijnen, Ben F. M.
    van der Putten, Inge M.
    Groothuis, Siebren
    de Kinderen, Reina J. A.
    Noben, Cindy Y. G.
    Paulus, Aggie T. G.
    Ramaekers, Bram L. T.
    Vogel, Gaston C. W. M.
    Hiligsmann, Mickael
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 15 (04) : 721 - 728
  • [35] Enhancing Public Health Messaging: Discrete-Choice Experiment Evidence on the Design of HIV Testing Messages in China
    Durvasula, Maya
    Pan, Stephen W.
    Ong, Jason J.
    Tang, Weiming
    Cao, Bolin
    Liu, Chuncheng
    Terris-Prestholt, Fern
    Tucker, Joseph D.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (05) : 568 - 582
  • [36] On the ecological fallacy in discrete-choice models
    Herger, Nils
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2020, 34
  • [37] UTILITY MAXIMIZATION IN MODELS OF DISCRETE-CHOICE
    PEITZ, M
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1995, 49 (01) : 91 - 94
  • [38] The Value Employees Place on Health Insurance Plans: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Stephen Poteet
    Benjamin M. Craig
    [J]. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2019, 17 : 817 - 825
  • [39] The Value Employees Place on Health Insurance Plans: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Poteet, Stephen
    Craig, Benjamin M.
    [J]. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2019, 17 (06) : 817 - 825
  • [40] A Systematic Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis Studies in People with Multiple Sclerosis
    Webb, Edward J. D.
    Meads, David
    Eskyte, Ieva
    King, Natalie
    Dracup, Naila
    Chataway, Jeremy
    Ford, Helen L.
    Marti, Joachim
    Pavitt, Sue H.
    Schmierer, Klaus
    Manzano, Ana
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (04): : 391 - 402